Crime Statistics as Constructs: The Case of Swedish Rape Statistics

  • Hanns Von Hofer
Article

Abstract

Using Swedish rape statistics as a focus, this article aims to empirically describe the way in which different factors affect official crime statistics produced at the national level. It is argued that cross-national comparisons of crime levels are extremely hazardous when based on official crime statistics, since the construction rules vary widely. International comparisons of crime levels should as a rule be confined to findings of international victim surveys. The example of rape statistics in Sweden - about three times higher when compared to other countries in the European Sourcebook - is used to explain what factors can influence statistics. Statistical, legal and substansive factors are to be taken into account. The author shows that changes in statistical routines, the legal definition of rape and changes over time all influence the statistics in a substansive way. This article indicates the great extent to which crime statistics are a construct, whose appearance is very sensitive to the rules applied in the process of construction. In order to employ statistics appropriately, a thorough knowledge of the principles guiding this process is therefore essential.

crime statistics rape 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. AFS, Autobox Plus: User's Guide. Hatboro: Automatic Forecasting Systems, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, C. and J. Moynihan, Understanding Crime Data: Haunted by the Dark Figure. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. Council of Europe, European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics. European Committee on Crime Problems (CDPC). PC-S-ST (99) 8 REV, 7 July 1999. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. Kangspunta, K., M. Joutsen and N. Ollus (Eds), Crime and Criminal Justice in Europe and North America 1990-1994. Helsinki: European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, affiliated with the United Nations (HEUNI), 1998.Google Scholar
  5. Hindess, B., The Use of Official Statistics in Sociology: A Critique of Positivism and Ethnomethodology. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. Home Office, A Question of Evidence? Investigating and Prosecuting Rape in the 1990s. Research Study 196. London: Home Office, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Jupp, V., Methods of Criminological Research. Contemporary Social Research (19). London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.Google Scholar
  8. Langan, P.A. and D.P. Farrington, Crime and Justice in the United States and in England and Wales, 1981-96. Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice, 1998. [http://www.ojp.usdoj/bjs/cjusew96/contents.htm-Page last revised on December 17, 1998]Google Scholar
  9. Mayhew, P. and J.J.M. van Dijk, Criminal Victimisation in Eleven Industrialised Countries: Key Findings from the 1996 International Crime Victims Survey. Onderzoek en beleid (162). The Hague: WODC, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Newman, G. (Ed.), Global Report on Crime and Justice. Published for the United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention. Centre for International Crime Prevention. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. Persson, L.G.W., Om antalsräkning av brott [On counting crimes]. Promemorior från SCB, 1973:11. Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån, 1973.Google Scholar
  12. SCB, Rättsstatistisk årsbok 1976 [Yearbook of Legal Statistics 1976]. Sveriges officiella statistik. Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanns Von Hofer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CriminologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations