Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 459–463 | Cite as

Variability for quantitative traits in exotic hybrid germplasm of sugarcane

  • N.V. Nair
  • R. Balakrishnan
  • T.V. Sreenivasan
Article

Abstract

The foreign hybrid collection of sugarcane germplasm comprising 399 clones representing 10 geographical groups, was evaluated for nine yield and quality characters, in relation to their place of origin. Discriminant function analysis showed that all the nine variables contributed significantly to the discrimination of the groups, the maximum contribution being cane height. The overall percentage of correct classification was only 48%, with a range from 32% to 73% with respect to individual groups. This suggests an underlying genetic similarity among the groups, which stem largely from their common genetic base. The exceptions were the Hawaii and Mauritius groups, which had distinct identities. The Hawaii group was the most productive group, having maximum yield and sucrose potential. The Puerto Rico group was the best source for juice sucrose. Australian varieties bred for high juice quality did not show the expected level of juice sucrose in the present study. The use in breeding programmes of Hawaiian varieties, which have a broader genetic base and high yield and quality potential, might impart better productivity to commercial varieties.

discriminant analysis diversity factor analysis sugarcane variability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arceneaux, G., 1967. Cultivated sugarcanes of the world and their botanical derivation. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Technol. 12: 844–854.Google Scholar
  2. Berding, N. & B.T. Roach, 1987. Germplasm collection, maintenance and use. In: D.J. Heinz (Ed), Sugarcane improvement through breeding, pp. 143–210, Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Ethirajan, A.S., 1960. Some observation on the foreign commercial varieties released from Coimbatore during 1957 and 1958. Proc. All India Sugarcane Res. & Development Workers. 4: 291–299.Google Scholar
  4. Harman, H.H., 1967. Modern Factor Analysis. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.Google Scholar
  5. Heinz, D.J., 1967. Wild Saccharum species for breeding in Hawaii. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Technol. 12: 1037–1043.Google Scholar
  6. Heinz, D.J., 1980. Thailand S.spontaneum hybrid progeny as a new germplasm source in Hawaii. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Technol. 17: 1347–1356.Google Scholar
  7. Lachenbruch, P.A., 1975. Discriminant Analysis. Hafner Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Meade, G.P. & J.C.P. Chen, 1977. Cane Sugar Hand Book. 10th ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York.Google Scholar
  9. Nair, N.V., T.V. Sreenivasan & R. Balakrishnan, 1997. Sugarcane Database. Vol II: Database on foreign varieties. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore.Google Scholar
  10. Rao, J.T., U. Vijayalakshmi & A.S. Ethirajan, 1964. Notes on foreign cane varieties. II Australian sugarcanes. Indian J. Sugarcane Res.& Development. 8:(3). 306–310.Google Scholar
  11. Stevenson, J.C., 1965. Genetics and Breeding of sugarcane. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
  12. Tew, T.L., 1987. New varieties. In: D.J. Heinz (Ed), Sugarcane Improvement Through Breeding, pp. 559–594, Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • N.V. Nair
    • 1
  • R. Balakrishnan
    • 1
  • T.V. Sreenivasan
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Council of Agricultural ResearchSugarcane Breeding InstituteCoimbatore-India

Personalised recommendations