Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 143–147 | Cite as

On the Origin of Almond

  • G. Ladizinsky


Almond, Amygdalus communis L., is an ancient crop of south west Asia. Selection of the sweet type marks the beginning of almond domestication. Wild almonds are bitter and eating even a relatively small number of nuts can be fatal. How man selected the sweet type remains a riddle. Also, the wild ancestor of almond has not been properly identified among the many wild almond species. Breeding experiment, which is the most critical test for identifying the wild progenitors of other crops, is ineffective in almond, because it is interfertile with many wild taxa. The so-called wild A. communis of central Asia cannot be regarded as a genuine wild form, but as a feral form, or remains of old afforestation. The wild taxa morphologically akin to almond, A. korshinskyi (H.-M.) Bomm. and A. webbii Spach, are also feral types occurring in the Middle East and southern Europe, respectively. The taxon A. fenzliana (Fritsch) Lipsky is the most likely wild ancestor of almond for three reasons: 1. It is a genuine wild type forming extensive thickets of large trees young seedlings and all the intergradations between them in nature; 2. Its morphology, and particularly the partially pitted grooved nut-shell are within the range of variation of almond, and 3. A. fenzliana is native of Armenia and western Azerbaijan in the Middle East where almond was apparently domesticated.

Amygdalus distribution domestication taxonomy wild relatives 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Browicrz, K. & D. Zohary, 1996. The genus Amygdalus L. (Rosaceae): Species relationships, distribution and evolution under domestication. Genet. Resou. Crop Evol, 43: 229–247.Google Scholar
  2. Denisov, V.P., 1988. Almond genetic resources in the USSR and their use in production and breeding. Acta. Hort. 244: 2990306.Google Scholar
  3. Heppner, M. J., 1923. The factor for bitterness in sweet almond. Genetics 11:380–391.Google Scholar
  4. Heppner, M.J. 1926. Further evidence on the factor of bitterness in sweet almond. Genetics 11: 605–606.Google Scholar
  5. Kester D.F., T.M. Gradziel & C. Grasselly, 1991, Almond (Prunus), In: Genetic Rcsources of Temperate Fruits And Nut Crops. J.N. Moore & J.R. Ballington Eds. Int. Soc. Hort. Sci. pp. 701–758.Google Scholar
  6. Kislev, M.E., D. Nadel & I. Carmi, 1992 Epipalacolilhic (19,000 BP) cereal and fruit diet at Ohalo II, Sea of. Galilee, Israel. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynology 73: 161–166.Google Scholar
  7. Komarov, V.L., B.K. Shiskin & S.V. Yazepchlik, 1941. Flora of the USSR vol. 10 389–407. (Translated from Russian, Israel Programme for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem 1971).Google Scholar
  8. McCreery, D.W. 1979. Flotation of the Bab edh-Dhra and Numeria plant remains. Ann. Am. School Orient. Res. 46: l65–169.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Ladizinsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureThe Hebrew University of JerusalemRehovotIsrael (Fax

Personalised recommendations