Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 7, Issue 3–4, pp 167–185 | Cite as

Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns

  • Finn Kensing
  • Jeanette Blomberg

Abstract

We characterize Participatory Design (PD) as a maturing area of research and as an evolving practice among design professionals. Although PD has been applied outside of technology design, here we focus on PD in relation to the introduction of computer-based systems at work. We discuss three main issues addressed by PD researchers; the politics of design; the nature of participation; and method, tools and techniques for participation. We also report on the conditions for the transfer of “PD results” to workers, user groups, and design professionals that have characterized PD over time and across geopolitical terrains. The topic of the sustainability of PD within an organizational context is also considered. The article concludes with a discussion of common issues explored within PD and CSCW and frames directions for a continuing dialogue between researchers and practitioners from the two fields. The article draws on a review of PD and CSCW literatures as well as on our own research and practical experiences.

CSCW design professionals participatory design politics of design sustainability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, N. E., F. Kensing, J. Lundin, L. Mathiassen, A. Munk-Madsen, M. Rasbech and P. Sørgaard (1990): Professional Systems Development: Experience, Ideas and Action. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, E. (1996): P is for Political. In J. Blomberg, F. Kensing and E. Dykstra-Ericson (eds.): Proceeding of the Participatory Design Conference. Cambridge, MA: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, pp. 117-125.Google Scholar
  3. Bemelmans, Th. (ed.) (1984): Beyond Productivity: Information Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness. In Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference. Minneapolis, Minnesota: North Holland.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, J., B. Hartfield and T. Winograd (1992): Learning HCI Design: Mentoring Project Groups in a Course on Human-computer Interaction. Proceeding of the SIGCSE’ 92 Technical Symposium. New York: ACM, pp. 154-158.Google Scholar
  5. Bentley, R., T. Rodden, P. Sawyer, I. Sommerville, J. Hughes, D. Randall and D. Shapiro (1992): Ethnographically-informed Systems Design for Air Traffic Control. In J. Turner and R. Kraut (ed.): Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’ 92). Toronto, Canada: ACM Press, Oct-Nov, pp. 123-129.Google Scholar
  6. Beyer, H. and K. Holtzblatt (1997): Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Bjerknes, G., P. Ehn and M. Kyng (1987): Computers and Democracy - A Scandinavian Challenge. England: Avebury.Google Scholar
  8. Bjerknes, G. and T. Bratteteig (1995): User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 7 no.1, pp. 73-98.Google Scholar
  9. Blomberg, J., J. Giacomi, P. Swenton-Wall and A. Mosher (1993): Ethnographic Methods and their Relation to Design. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.): Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 123-155.Google Scholar
  10. Blomberg, J., L. Suchman, and R. Trigg (1996): Reflections on a Work-oriented Design Project. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 11, no.3, pp. 237-265.Google Scholar
  11. Blomberg, J., L. Suchman and R. Trigg (1997): Back to Work: Renewing Old Agendas for Change. In M. Kyng and L. Mathiassen (eds.): Computers and Design in Context. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 201-238.Google Scholar
  12. Braverman, H. (1974): Labor and Monopoly Capital - The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  13. Briefs, U., C. Ciborra and L. Sneider (eds.) (1983): Systems Design For, With and By the Users. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  14. Brun-Cottan, F. and P. Wall (1995). Using Video to Re-present the User. Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no.5, pp. 61-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bødker, S. (1996): Creating Conditions for Participation: Conflicts and Ressources in Systems Development. Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 215-236.Google Scholar
  16. Clement, A. (1994): Computing at Work: Empowering Action by “Low-Level” Users. Communication of the ACM, vol. 37, no.1, pp. 52-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clement, A. and P. Van den Besselar (1993): A Retrospective Look at PD Projects. In M. Muller and S. Kuhn (eds.): Participatory Design: Special Issue of the Communications of the ACM, vol. 36, no.4, pp. 29-39.Google Scholar
  18. Ehn, P. (1989): Work Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Ehn, P. (1993): Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.): Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 41-78.Google Scholar
  20. Ehn, P. and Å. Sanberg (1979): Management Control and Wage Earner Power (Foretagsstyrning och Lontagarmakt). Falkoping: Prisma.Google Scholar
  21. Ehn, P. and M. Kyng (1991): Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (eds.): Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., pp. 169-195.Google Scholar
  22. Greenbaum, J. (1976): Division of Labor in the Computer Field. Monthly Review, vol. 28, no.3, pp. 40-55.Google Scholar
  23. Greenbaum, J. (1995): Windows on the Workplace: Computers, Jobs, and the Organization of Office Work in the Late Twentieth Century.New York: Mondthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  24. Greenbaum, J. (1996): Back to Labor: Returning to Labor Process Discussions in the Study of Work. Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work.Google Scholar
  25. Greenbaum, J. and M. Kyng (eds.) (1991): Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.Google Scholar
  26. Grief, I. (ed.) (1988): Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman Pub.Google Scholar
  27. Grønbæk, K., M. Kyng and P. Mogensen (1997): Toward a Cooperative Experimental System Development Approach. In M. Kyng and L. Mathiassen (eds.): Computers and Design in Context. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 201-238.Google Scholar
  28. Gärtner, J. (1998): Participatory Design in Consulting, Computer Supported Cooperative Work - A Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 7, nos.3-4.Google Scholar
  29. Gärtner, J. and I. Wagner (1996): Mapping Actors and Agendas: Political Frameworks of Systems Design and Participation. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 11, no.3, pp. 187-214.Google Scholar
  30. Holtzblatt, K. and S. Jones (1993): Contextual Inquiry: A Participatory Technique for System Design. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.): Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 177-210.Google Scholar
  31. Hughes, J. A., D. Randall and D. Shapiro (1993): From Ethnographic Record to System Design: Some Experiences from the Field. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, no.3, pp. 123-147.Google Scholar
  32. Kautz, K. (1996): User Participation and Participatory Design: Topics in Computing Education. Human-Computer Interaction, vol 11, no3, pp. 267-284.Google Scholar
  33. Kensing, F. (1983): The Trade Unions Influence on Technological Change. In U. Briefs et al. (eds.): Systems Design For, With and By the Users. North Holland.Google Scholar
  34. Kensing, F. (1987): Generation of Visions in Systems Development - A Supplement to the Toolbox. In P. Docherty et al. (eds.): Systems Design for Human Development and Productivity: Participation and Beyond. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Kensing, F. (1998): Prompted Reflections: A Technique for Understanding Complex Work. Interactions, vol. 1, pp. 7-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kensing, F., J. Simonsen and K. Bødker (1998): Participatory Design at a Radio Station. Computer Supported Cooperative Work - A Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 7, nos.3-4.Google Scholar
  37. Kensing, F., J. Simonsen and K. Bødker (forthcoming): MUST - A Method for Participatory Design. Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Korpela, M., H. A., Soriyan, K. C. Olufokunbi, A. A. Onayade, A. Davies-Adetugbo and D. Adesanmi (1998): Community Participation in Health Informatics in Africa: An Experiment in Tripartite Partnership in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Computer Supported Cooperative Work - A Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 7, nos.3-4.Google Scholar
  39. Kyng, M. and L. Mathiassen (1982): Systems Development and Trade Union Activities, in N. Bjørn-Andersen (ed.): Information Society, for richer, for poorer. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  40. Kyng, M. and L. Mathiassen (1997): Computers and Design in Context. Cambridge MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  41. Mambrey, P., G. Mark and U. Pankoke-Babatz (1998): User Advocacy in Participatory Design: Designers’ Experiences with a New Communication Channel. Computer Supported Cooperative Work - A Journal of Collaborative Computing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, vol. 7, nos.3-4.Google Scholar
  42. Mathiassen, L. (1981): System Development and System Development Method(in Danish). PhD. thesis, DAIMI PB-136, Computer Science, Århus University, Denmark.Google Scholar
  43. Mogensen, P. (1992). Towards a Provotyping Approach in Systems Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 4, pp. 31-53.Google Scholar
  44. Mogensen, P. H. (1994): Challanging Practice - An Approach to Cooperative Analysis. PhD. thesis, DAIMI PB-465, Computer Science, Aarhus University, Denmark.Google Scholar
  45. Muller, M. (1993): PICTIVE: Democratizing the Dynamics of the Design Session. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.): Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 211-238.Google Scholar
  46. Muller, M. J., L. B. Tudor, D.M. Wildman, E. A. White, R. W. Root, T. Dayton, R. Carr, B. Diekmann and E. A. Dykstr-Erickson (1995): Bifocal Tolls for Scenarios and Representations in Participatory Activities with Users. In J. Carroll (ed.): Scenario-based Design for Human-computer Interaction. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Noble, D. (1977): America by Design. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  48. Nygaard, K. (1979): The Iron and Metal Project: Trade Union Participation, In Å. Sandberg (ed.): Computers Dividing Man and Work - Recent Scandinavian Research on Planning and Computers from a Trade Union Perspective. Swedish Center for Working Life, Demos Project report no. 13, Utbildningsproduktion, Malmø, Sweden.Google Scholar
  49. Sandberg, Å. (ed.) (1979): Computers Dividing Man and Work - Recent Scandinavian Research on Planning and Computers from a Trade Union Perspective. Swedish Center for Working Life, Demos Project report no. 13, Utbildningsproduktion, Malmø, Sweden.Google Scholar
  50. Schmidt and Bannon (1992): Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, nos.1-2, pp. 7-40.Google Scholar
  51. Schuler and Namioka (1993): Praticipatory Design: Principles and Practices. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. Shapiro, D. (1994): The Limits of Ethnography: Combining Social Sciences for CSCW. Proceedings of The Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. North Carolina: Chapel Hill, pp. 417-428.Google Scholar
  53. Simonsen, J. and F. Kensing (1997): Using Ethnography in Contextual Design. Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, no.7, pp. 82-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Suchman, L. (1993): Forward. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.): Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. vii-ix.Google Scholar
  55. Trigg, R., S. Bødker and K. Grønbæk (1991): Open-ended Interaction in Cooperative Prototyping: A Video-based Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 3, pp. 63-86.Google Scholar
  56. Winner, L. (1977): Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Finn Kensing
    • 1
  • Jeanette Blomberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceRoskilde UniversityDenmark
  2. 2.Xerox Palo Alto Research CenterPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations