Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective

  • Yrjö Engeström


Work is commonly made visible along two dimensions: the linear and the socio-spatial. Both are limited to depicting work in terms of relatively discrete actions. Activity theory introduces the crucial distinction between collective activity systems and individual actions. Expansive visibilization of collective activity systems offers a powerful intervention methodology for dealing with major transformations of work. The linear and the socio-spatial dimensions of work actions are seen in the broader perspective of a third, developmental dimension of work activity. Four steps are identified in a cycle of expansive visibilization, combining activity-level visions and action-level concretizations. The cycle is examined in detail as it unfolded in an intervention study at a children's hospital in Finland. It is concluded that expansive visibilization, driven by contradictions and seeking to reconceptualize the object and motive of work, is not a straightforward process which can be neatly controlled from above. Coherent analytical explanation and goal-setting may come only after the creation and practical implementation of innovative solutions.

activity theory action transformation expansive learning intervention visibilization health care medical records 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Billig, M. & et al. (1988): Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Engeström, Y. (1987): Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  3. Engeström, Y. (1990): Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  4. Engeström, Y. (1993): Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Engeström, Y. (1995): Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: An activity-theoretical perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 7, pp. 395–412.Google Scholar
  6. Engeström, Y. (1996a): Development as breaking away and opening up: A challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget. Swiss Journal of Psychology, vol. 55, pp. 126–132.Google Scholar
  7. Engeström, Y. (1996b): Developmental work research as educational research. Nordisk Pedagogik: Journal of Nordic Educational Research, vol. 16, pp. 131–143.Google Scholar
  8. Engeström, Y., K. Brown, L.C. Christopher and J. Gregory (1997): Coordination, cooperation, and communication in the courts: Expansive transitions in legal work. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström & O. Vasquez (eds.): Mind, culture and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Engeström, Y., J. Virkkunen, M. Helle, J. Pihlaja and R. Poikela (1996): Change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, vol. 1,no. 2, pp. 10–17.Google Scholar
  10. Goodwin, C. and M.H. Goodwin (1996): Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (eds.): Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gray, B.H. (1991): The profit motive and patient care: The changing accountability of doctors and hospitals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate! Harvard Business Review, vol. 68,no. 4, pp. 104–112.Google Scholar
  13. Hammer, M. and J. Champy (1993): Reengineering the corporation. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  14. Heath, C. and P. Luff (1996): Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (eds.): Cognition and communication at work/ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Leont'ev, A.N. (1978): Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Leont'ev, A.N. (1981): Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  17. Manganelli, R.L. and M.M. Klein (1994). The reengineering handbook: A step-by-step guide to business transformation. New York: Amacom.Google Scholar
  18. Margolis, H. (1993): Paradigms and barriers: How habits of mind govern scientific beliefs. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Suchman, L. (1987): Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Suchman, L. (1995): Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, vol. 38,no. 9, pp. 56–64.Google Scholar
  21. Suchman, L. (1996): Constituting shared workspaces. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (eds.): Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Tikhomirov, O.K. (1988): The psychology of thinking. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  23. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978): Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Weick, K.E. (1995): Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Wodak, R. (1997): Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yrjö Engeström
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Academy of Finland, Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work ResearchUniversity of HelsinkiFinland, E-mail
  2. 2.Laboratory of Comparative Human CognitionUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA, E-mail

Personalised recommendations