Advertisement

Distributed and Parallel Databases

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 217–246 | Cite as

Dynamic Query Operator Scheduling for Wide-Area Remote Access

  • Laurent Amsaleg
  • Michael J. Franklin
  • Anthony Tomasic
Article

Abstract

Distributed databases operating over wide-area networks such as the Internet, must deal with the unpredictable nature of the performance of communication. The response times of accessing remote sources can vary widely due to network congestion, link failure, and other problems. In such an unpredictable environment, the traditional iterator-based query execution model performs poorly. We have developed a class of methods, called query scrambling, for dealing explicitly with the problem of unpredictable response times. Query scrambling dynamically modifies query execution plans on-the-fly in reaction to unexpected delays in data access. In this paper we focus on the dynamic scheduling of query operators in the context of query scrambling. We explore various choices for dynamic scheduling and examine, through a detailed simulation, the effects of these choices. Our experimental environment considers pipelined and non-pipelined join processing in a client with multiple remote data sources and delayed or possibly bursty arrivals of data. Our performance results show that scrambling rescheduling is effective in hiding the impact of delays on query response time for a number of different delay scenarios.

Distributed query processing mediators iterator execution model performance analysis query scrambling dynamic query optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Adali, K. Candan, Y. Papakonstantinou, and V. Subrahmanian. Query caching and optimization in distributed mediator systems. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf., Montreal, Canada, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Amsaleg, M. Franklin, A. Tomasic, and T. Urhan. Scrambling query plans to cope with unexpected delays. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Parallel and Distributed Information Systems (PDIS), Miami Beach, Florida, December 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laurent Amsaleg, Michael J. Franklin, and Anthony Tomasic. Query scrambling for bursty data arrival. Technical Report UMCP-CSD CS-TR-3714, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, November 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Antoshenkov. Dynamic query optimization in Rdb/VMS. In Proc. of the Data Engineering Int. Conf., pages 538-547, Vienna, Austria, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Blakeley, W. McKenna, and G. Graefe. Experiences building the open OODB query optimizer. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf., page 287, Washington, DC, May 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Bodorik, J. Riordon, and C. Jacob. Dynamic distributed query processing techniques. In Proc. of the 17th annual ACM Computer Science Conf., pages 348-357, Louisville, Kentucky, February 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Brown. Prpl: A database workload specification language. Master's thesis, University of Winsconsin, Madison, Winsconsin, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Bukhres and A. Elmagarmid. Object-Oriented Multidatabase Systems. Prentice Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Carey, D. DeWitt, M. Franklin, N. Hall, M. McAuliffe, J. Naughton, D. Schuh, M. Solomon, C. Tan, O. Tsatalos, S. White, and M. Zwilling. Shoring up persistent applications. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf., Minneapolis, Minnesota, May 1994.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Cole and G. Graefe. Optimization of dynamic query execution plans. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf., pages 150-160, Minneapolis, Minnesota, May 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Dar, M. Franklin, B. Jónsson, D. Srivastava, and M. Tan. Semantic data caching and replacement. In Proc. of the 22th VLDB Int. Conf, Bombay, India, September 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Franklin, B. Jónsson, and D. Kossmann. Performance tradeoffs for client-server query processing. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf., Montréal, Canada, June 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Graefe. Query evaluation techniques for large databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 25(2):73-170, June 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Kim. Modern Database Systems: The Object Model, Interoperability, and Beyond. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Mendelzon, G. Mihaila, and T. Milo. Querying the world wide web. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Parallel and Distribution Information Systems (PDIS), Miami Beach, Florida, December 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. Ozcan, S. Nural, P. Koksal, C. Evrendilek, and A. Dogac. Dynamic query optimization on a distributed object management platform. In Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Baltimore, Maryland, November 1996.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Sarawagi and M. Stonebraker. Reordering execution in tertiary memory databases. In VLDB, Bombay, India, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Shan, R. Ahmen, J. Davis, W. Du, and W. Kent. Modern Database Systems: The Object Model, Interoperability, and Beyond, chapter Pegasus: A Heterogeneous Information Management System. ACM Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Stonebraker, P. Aoki, W. Litwin, A. Pfeffer, A. Sah, J. Sidell, C. Staelin, and A. Yu. Mariposa: A wide-area distributed database system. The VLDB Journal, 5(1):48-63, January 1996.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Thomas, G. Thompson, C. Chung, E. Barkmeyer, F. Carter, M. Templeton, S. Fox, and B. Hartman. Heterogeneous distributed database systems for product use. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(3), 1990.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Tomasic, L. Raschid, and P. Valduriez. Scaling heterogeneous databases and the design of DISCO. In The IEEE Int. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS-16), Hong Kong, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC). TPC Benchmark D (Decision Support), May 1995. Standard Specification, Revision 1.0.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Urhan, M. Franklin, and L. Amsaleg. Cost based query scrambling for initial delays. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf., Seattle, Washington, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurent Amsaleg
    • 1
  • Michael J. Franklin
    • 2
  • Anthony Tomasic
    • 3
  1. 1.Campus de BeaulieuIRISA/INRIARennesFrance
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of MarylandUSA
  3. 3.INRIA RocquencourtLe ChesnayFrance

Personalised recommendations