Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 231–243 | Cite as

Social Constructivism, the Gospel of Science, and the Teaching of Physics

  • Helge Kragh
Article

Abstract

During the last two decades, science studies have increasingly been dominated by ideas related to social constructivism and the sociology of scientific knowledge. This paper offers a critical examination of some of the basic claims of this branch of science studies and argues that social constructivists cannot explain some of the most characteristic features of the physical sciences. The implications of social constructivism for science education are considered. I conclude that if education in physics consistently followed the philosophy of sociology of scientific knowledge in its more extreme versions it would mean the end of physics. However, the rejection of social constructivism does not imply a rejection of social or cultural studies of science or their value in science education.

Keywords

Characteristic Feature Science Education Scientific Knowledge Science Study Cultural Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ashmore, M.: 1993, 'The Theatre of the Blind: Starring a Promethean Prankster, a Phoney Phenomenon, a Prism, a Pocket, and a Piece of Wood', Social Studies of Science 23, 67-106.Google Scholar
  2. Brannigan, A.: 1981, The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, S.: 1992, Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, H.: 1981, 'Stages in the Empirical Program of Relativism', Social Studies of Science 11, 3-10.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, H. & Pinch, T.: 1993, The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, H. & Shapin, S.: 1983, 'The Historical Role of the Experiment', in F. Bevilacqua and P.J. Kennedy (eds.), Using History of Physics in Innovatory Physics Education. Pavia: The International Commission on Physics Education, pp. 282-292.Google Scholar
  7. Dessaur, C.I. et al. (eds.): 1975, Science Between Culture and Counter-Culture. Nijmegen: Dekker and van de Vegt.Google Scholar
  8. Franklin, A.: 1990, Experiment, Right or Wrong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Galison, P.: 1987, How Experiments End. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gross, P.R. & Levitt, N.: 1994, Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Holton, G.: 1993, Science and Anti-Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kuhn, T.: 1992, 'The Trouble with the Historical Philosophy of Science', Robert and Maurine Rotschild Distinguished Lecture. Harvard University.Google Scholar
  13. Labinger, J. A.: 1995, 'Science as Culture: A View from the Petri Dish', Social Studies of Science 25, 285-306.Google Scholar
  14. Laudan, L.: 1990, Science and Relativism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Murphy, R.: 1994, 'The Sociological Construction of Science Without Nature', Sociology 28, 957-974.Google Scholar
  16. Nowotny, H. & Rose, H.: 1979, Counter-Movements in the Sciences: The Sociology of the Alternatives to Big Science, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  17. Pickering, A.: 1984, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pinch, T.: 1993, 'Generations of SSK', Social Studies of Science 23, 363-373.Google Scholar
  19. Sismondo, S.: 1993, 'Some Social Constructions', Social Studies of Science 23, 515-553.Google Scholar
  20. Slezak, P.: 1994, 'Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Education', Science & Education 3, 265-294, 329–355.Google Scholar
  21. Stephenson, R.: 1982, 'The Skies of Babylon', New Scientist (August 19), 478-481.Google Scholar
  22. Toulmin, S.: 1973, 'The Historical Background to the Anti-Science Movement', in Civilization and Science, CIBA Foundation: Amsterdam, pp. 23-32.Google Scholar
  23. Trout, J.D.: 1994, 'A Realistic Look Backward', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25, 37-64.Google Scholar
  24. Weinberg, S.: 1992, Dreams of a Final Theory: The Search for the Fundamental Laws of Nature, New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  25. Wolpert, L.: 1992, The Unnatural Nature of Science, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  26. Woolgar, S.: 1983, 'Irony in the Social Study of Science', in K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds.), Science Observed, London: Sage, pp. 239-266.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helge Kragh
    • 1
  1. 1.History of Science DepartmentAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark, E-mail

Personalised recommendations