Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 6, Issue 1–2, pp 121–133 | Cite as

Constructivist Metaphors of Learning Science

  • Jon Ogborn
Article

Abstract

Based on an analysis of a fundamental distinction between metaphors of ’finding‘ versus ’making‘ for the obtaining of new knowledge, a number of constructivist positions in education are discussed and criticised, taking account of earlier criticism particularly by Suchting and by Matthews. Constructivist claims which are denied include the claim that we have no direct access to the world, and the claim that communication is inherently meaningless. What is valuable in constructivism, namely the insistence on active learning, on respect for the pupil‘s own thinking, and on the high priority needed for ideas taught to make sense to pupils, together with the reminder that science is a human product, is important to retain without its additional and ill-founded philosophical baggage.

Keywords

Active Learning Direct Access Fundamental Distinction Human Product Early Criticism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bhaskar, R.: 1978, A Realist Theory of Science, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.Google Scholar
  2. Confrey, J.: 1990, ‘What Constructivism Implies for Teaching’, in Davis, R., Maher, C. & Noddings, N. (eds.), Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  3. Davidson, D.: 1980, Essay on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Davidson, D.: 1984, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Davidson, D.: 1986, ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’, in LePorc, E. (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Driver, R.: 1989, ‘The Construction of Scientific Knowledge in School Classrooms’, in Millar, R. (ed.), Doing Science: Images of Science in Science Education, Falmer Press, Lewes.Google Scholar
  7. Driver, R. & Oldham, V.: 1986, ‘A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science’, Studies in Science Education 13, 105–122.Google Scholar
  8. Glasersfeld, E. von: 1987, The Construction of Knowledge, Intersystems Publications, California.Google Scholar
  9. Glasersfeld, E. von: 1989, ‘Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching’, Synthese 80, 121–140.Google Scholar
  10. Goodman, N.: 1978, Ways of Worldmaking, Hackett, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Matthews, M.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  12. Millar, R. & Driver, R.: 1987, ‘Beyond Processes’, Studies in Science Education 14, 33–62.Google Scholar
  13. Nadeau, R. & Desautels, J.: 1984, Epistemology and the Teaching of Science, Science Council of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  14. Novak, J.: 1977, A Theory of Education, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  15. Oakeshott, M.: 1962, ‘The Tower of Babel’, in Oakeshott, M., Rationalism in Politics, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  16. Osborne, R. & Whitrock, M., 1985, ‘The Generative Learning Model and its Implications for Science Education’, Studies in Science Education 12, 59–87.Google Scholar
  17. Popper, K.: 1979, Objective Knowledge, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Putnam, H.: 1975, Philosophical Papers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Putnam, H.: 1981, Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Quine, W. V. O.: 1981, Theories and Things, Belknap Press, Harvard.Google Scholar
  22. Rorty, R.: 1991, Objectivity, Relativism and Truth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Solomon, J.: 1994, ‘The Rise and Fall of Constructivism’, Sdudies in Science & Education 23, 1–19.Google Scholar
  24. Suchting, W.: 1992, ‘Constructivism Deconstructed’, Science & Education 1, 223–254.Google Scholar
  25. Wheatley, G.: 1991, ‘Constructivist Perspectives on Science and Mathemarics Education, Science Education 75(1), 9–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Ogborn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Science Education, Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations