Advertisement

Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 127–131 | Cite as

Technicians or patient advocates? − still a valid question

  • Anna Birna Almarsd¢ttir
  • Janine Marie Morgall
Article

Abstract

New legislation went into effect in Iceland in March 1996 making it the first Nordic country to liberate their drug distribution system. The term liberalization implies the abolishment of the professional monopoly in that ownership was not tied to the pharmacy profession anymore. Focus group discussions with community pharmacists in the capital area Reykjav¡k and rural areas were employed to answer the research question: How has the pharmacists' societal role evolved after the legislation and what are the implications for pharmacy practice? The results showed firstly that the public image and the self‐image of the pharmacist has changed in the short time since the legislative change. The pharmacists generally said that their patient contact is deteriorating due to the discount wars, the rural pharmacists being more optimistic, and believing in a future competition based on quality. Secondly, the results showed that the pharmacists have difficulties reconciling their technical paradigm with a legislative and professional will specifying customer and patient focus. This study describes the challenges of a new legislation with a market focus for community pharmacists whose education emphasized technical skills. This account of the changes in the drug distribution system in Iceland highlights some of the implications for pharmacists internationally.

Drug distribution Education Iceland Liberalization Pharmaceutical care Professional monopoly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anon. Act on Pharmaceuticals No. 108. Reykjavík: The Ministry of Health and Social Security, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anon. Act on Pharmaceutical Distribution No. 30. Reykjavík: The Ministry of Health and Social Security, 1963.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anon. The Pharmaceuticals Act No. 93. Reykjavík: The Ministry of Health and Social Security, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anon. Regulation on pharmacy licensing and pharmacies No. 426 (in Icelandic). Reykjavík: The Ministry of Health and Social Security, July, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ólafsson Ó, Grímsson A. New legislation on the distribution of drugs in Iceland – The legislators' intentions and evaluation of the reality after 2 years (in Danish). In: The Nordic Pharmacy Congress Book of Abstracts (Abstract number AF.12), Copenhagen, Denmark, June 7, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buerki RA, Vottero LD. The purposes of professions in society. In: Knowlton CH, Penna RP, eds. Pharmaceutical Care. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1996:3-17.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990;47:533-43.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knowlton CH, Penna RP. The pharmacist and pharmaceutical care. In: Knowlton CH, Penna RP, eds. Pharmaceutical Care. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1996:243-56.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Søndergaard B, Thorleifsson S, Herborg H, Frøkjær B, Hepler CD. Cost-effectiveness of a pharmaceutical care program to asthma patients. Hillerød, Denmark: The Danish College of Pharmacy Practice, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anon. Section for Community Pharmacists – Professional Symposia and Section Programmes, Federation Internationale Pharmaceutique (FIP), The Hague, The Netherlands, September 1-4, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. BJM 1995;311(July):299-302.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassell K, Hibbert D. The use of focus groups in pharmacy research: processes and practicalities. J Social Administrative Pharmacy 1996;13(4):169-77.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. London: Sage, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anon. Yearly report of the Pharmaceutical Society of Iceland (in Icelandic). Reykjavík: Pharmaceutical Society of Iceland, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oppenheimer M. The proletarization of the professional. In: Halmos P, ed. Professionalization and Social Change. Sociological Review Monograph No. 20. University of Keele, 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Birna Almarsd¢ttir
  • Janine Marie Morgall

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations