Advertisement

Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 152–158 | Cite as

Current controversies in the application of meta—analysis, (with special reference to oncological treatments)

  • Andrea Messori
Article

Abstract

Meta–analysis was proposed more than 20 years ago as an innovative technique for pooling the results of a series of clinical studies. This technique has a two–fold purpose: i) to retrieve pertinent clinical information without introducing selection biases; ii) to combine these clinical data obtained from different sources into a single synthetic index that summarises all available information. This review highlights the current perspectives in the application of meta–analysis and places particular emphasis on discussing the limitations of this technique that have been identified in recent years. Specific controversies in this area include: i) comparison between meta–analysis of the literature and meta–analysis of individual patient data; ii) heterogeneity of the clinical material introduced in the meta–analytic pooling; and iii) survival meta–analysis as a method for pooling long–term outcome data. After debating these three controversial points, this review examines the newest uses of meta–analysis that have been proposed for the evaluation of cost–effectiveness data and tries to identify the meta–analytic applications that will probably be expanded in the near future as opposed to those that will instead be developed less and less.

Meta–analysis Survival meta–analysis Heterogeneity Pharmacoeconomics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sacks HS, Berrier J, Reitman D, Ancona-Berk VA, Chalmers TC. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1987;316:450-5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lau J, Antman EM, Jimenez-Silva J, Kupelink B, Mosteller SF, Chalmers TC. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:248-54.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borzak S, Ridker PM. Discordance between meta-analyses and large-scale randomised controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 1995:123:873-877Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simes RJ. Confronting publication bias: a cohort design for meta-analysis. Stat Med 1987;6:11-29.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Ryan G, et al. Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and con-troversies. JAMA 1993;269:2749-53.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Cochrane Centre, Programme brochure (Cochrane Centre Summertown Pavillon, Middle Way, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L'Abbe' KA, Detsky AS, ORourke K. Meta-analysis in clinical research. Ann Int Med 1987;107:224-33.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klein S, Simes J, Blackburn GL. Total parenteral nutrition and cancer clinical trials. Cancer 1986;58:1378-86.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vandenbroucke JP. Passive smoking and lung cancer: a publi cation bias. BMJ 1988;296:391-2.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stewart, L.A., Parmar, M.K. Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? Lancet 1993;341:418-22.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeng GT, Scott JR, Burmeister LF. A comparison of meta-ana lytic results using literature vs individual patient data: pater nal cell immunizationfor recurrent miscarriage JAMA 1995;274:830-6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oxman AD, Clarke MJ, Stewart LA. From science to practice: meta-analysis using individual patient data are needed. JAMA 1995;274:845-6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alberti W, Anderson G, Bartolucci A, Bell D, et al. Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 random ised clinicla trials. BMJ 1995;311:899-909.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer-An overview of the randomized trials. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1444-55.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pignon JP, Arrigada R, Ihde DC et al. A meta-analysis of tho racic radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1618-24.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-analysis Project. Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: evidence in terms of response rate. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:896-903.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thompson SG. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analy sis should be investigated? BMJ 1994;309:1351-5.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Messori A, Trippoli S, Tendi E. G-CSF for the prophylaxis of neutropenic fever in patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving myelosuppressive antineoplastic chemotherapy: meta-analysis and pharmacoeconomic evaluation. J Clin Pharm Ther 1996;21:57-63.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pagliaro L, D'Amico G. Prevention of first bleeding in cirrho sis, a meta-analysis of randomized trials of nonsurgical treat ment. Ann Int Med 1992;117:59-70.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Der Simonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controll Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salomon P, Kornbluth A, Aisenberg J, Janowitz HD. How effec tive are current drugs for Crohn's disease? A meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1992;14:211-5.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sutherland LR, May GR, Shaffer EA. Sulfasalazine revisited: a meta-analysis of 5-aminosalicylic acid in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:540-9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Messori A, Rampazzo R. Meta-analysis on the maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993;17:178-80.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Messori A, Rampazzo R. Meta-analysis of clinical trials based on censored end-points: simplified theory and implementa tion of the statistical algorithms on a microcomputer. Comput Meth Progr Biomed 1993;40:261-7.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Henderson WG, Goldman S, Copeland JG, Moritz TE, Harker LA. Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy after coronary artery by-pass surgery. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:743-50.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fanning J, Bennett TZ, Hilgers RD. Meta-analysis of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide verus cisplatin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy of ovarian carcinmoma. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:954-60.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Souquet PJ, Chauvin F, Boissel JP, et al. Polychemotherapy in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet 1993;342:19-21.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gregory WM, Richards MA, Malpas JS. Combination chemo therapy versus melphalan and prednisolone in the treatment of multiple myeloma: an overview of published trials. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:334-42.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Messori A, Brignola C, Trallori G, Rampazzo R, Bardazzi G, Belloli C, d'Albasio G, De Simone G, Martini N. Effectiveness of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) for maintaining remission in patients with Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89;692-8.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Messori A, Trallori G, Scuffi C, et al. Legatura verso sclerotera pia nel trattamento delle varici esofagee: metanalisi di 6 studi (Abstract). Congresso Nazionale delle Malattie Digestive, Firenze, 3-7 Dicembre 1994.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bardelli F, Messori A, Rampazzo R, Alberti A, Martini N. Effect of recombinant or lymphoblastoid alpha interferon on ALT in patients with chronic hepatitis C or chronic non-A non-B hepatitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Drug Invest 1995;9:239-54.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Trallori G, Messori A, Scuffi C, Bardazzi G, Silvano R, dAlbasio G, Pacini F. Effectiveness of 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas for maintaining remission in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis: a meta and economic analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995;20:257-9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peto R. Why do we need systematic overviews of randomised trials? Stat Med 1987;6:233-40.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fine HA, Dear KBG, Loeffler JS, Black PML, Canellos GP. Meta-analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults. Cancer 1993;71:2585-97.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incom plete observations. Am Stat Ass J 1958:53:457-83.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kasiske BL, Heim-Duthoy K, Ma JZ. Elective cyclosporine withdrawal after renal transplantation. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1993;269:395-400.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Barnett HJM, Eliasziw M, Meldrum HE. Drugs and surgery in the prevention of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;332:338-48.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Warde P, Payne D. Does thoracic irradiation improve survival and local control in limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung? A meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:890-5.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Messori A, Rampazzo R, Scroccaro G, et al. Effectiveness of gabexate mesilate in acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 1995;40:734-8.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Messori A, Rampazzo R, Scroccaro G, Martini N. Effectiveness of hyperimmune anti-cytomegalovirus immunoglobulins for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in recipients of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: a meta-analysis. Bone Marrow Transplantation 1993;13:163-7.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Messori A, Trallori G, dAlbasio G, Milla M, Vannozzi G, Pacini F. Defined-formula diets versus steroids in the treatment of active Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996;31:267-72.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rinaldi M, Bardelli F, Rampazzo R, Lusuriello P, Messori A. Effectiveness of immunoglobulins for the prevention of systemic infections-A meta-analysis of 8 clinical studies in premature infants. Clin Drug Invest 1995;10:328-36.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Califf RM, et al. Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator as compared with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1418-24.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Messori A. Trends, new developments and pharmacoeco nomics. EHP 1996;2:124-7.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Messori A, Becagli P, Trippoli S, Tendi E. Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrex-ate+ fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1996;51: 111-6.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Messori A, Bonistalli L, Costantini M, Trallori G, Tendi E. Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 1996;23:269-74.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Messori A, Trippoli S, Becagli P, Tendi E. Pharmacoeconomic profile of paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a lifetime cost-effectiveness analy sis. Cancer 1996;78:2366-73.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Messori A, Bonistalli L, Costantini M, Alterini R. Cost-effec-tiveness of autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997;19(3) (in press).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Messori A, Becagli P, Trippoli S, Tendi E. A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon as adjuvant therapy in high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Cancer 1996 (in press).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Messori A. Survival curve fitting using the Gompertz func tion: a methodology for conducting cost-effectiveness analy ses on mortality data. Comput Meth Progr Biomed 1996 (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Messori
    • 1
  1. 1.Drug Information Centre, Servizio Farmaceutico, Azienda Ospedaliera CareggiDr. Andrea MessoriFlorence (

Personalised recommendations