Science & Education

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 525–542 | Cite as

Developmental and Educational Perspectives on Theory Change: To Have and Hold, or To Have and Hone?

  • Richard A. Duschl
  • Gedeon O. Deaák
  • Kirsten M. Ellenbogen
  • Douglas L. Holton


Eric Schwitzgebel presents an attractive argument for the use of affective indicators to both assess and extend the 'theory theory' research agenda. A key component of his argument is an account of explanation that can be applied to both children and adults, few of whom possess the attributes and behaviors that warrant being called scientists. The core features of his account include 1) regarding a set of propositions as a theory and 2) subscribing to a theory by accepting and employing this set of propositions to explain events within the theory's domain. We will argue that this account, while potentially helpful for guiding research on the affective content of explanations, requires elaboration because it (1) does not fully characterize what is distinctive and important about theoretical and scientific thinking, (2) raises questions about different kinds of explanations, such as seen in transitions from common-sense explanations to theoretical explanations; (3) favors individual theorizing to the exclusion of socially mediated theorizing, and (4) raises developmental questions about the nature of explanation-seeking and the capacity to apply evidence to evaluate theories.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackermann, R. J.: 1985, Data, Instruments, and Theory; A Dialectical Approach to Understanding Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bretherton, I., McNew, S., & Beeghly-Smith, M.: 1981, 'Early Person Knowledge as Expressed in Gestural and Verbal Communication: When Do Infants Acquire a Theory of Mind?', in M. Lamb & L. Sherrod (eds.), Infant Social Cognition: Empirical and Theoretical Considerations, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  3. Byrnes, J. P. & Overton, W. F.: 1986, 'Reasoning about Certainty and Uncertainty in Concrete and Propositional Contexts', Developmental Psychology 22, 793–799.Google Scholar
  4. Callanan, M. A. & Oakes, L. M.: 1992, 'Preschoolers' Questions and Parents' Explanations: Causal Thinking in Everyday Activity', Cognitive Development 7, 213–233.Google Scholar
  5. Carey, S.: 1985, Conceptual Change in Childhood, Bradford/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Carey, S. & Gelman, R. (eds.): 1991, The Epigenesis of Mind, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. Carey, S. & Spelke, E. S.: 1996, 'Science and Core Knowledge', Philosophy of Science 63(4), 515–533.Google Scholar
  8. Chi, M. T. H.: 1992, 'Conceptual Change Within and Across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science', in R. Giere (ed.), Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 129–186.Google Scholar
  9. DiSessa, A. A.: 1993, 'Toward an Epistemology of Physics', Cognition and Instruction 10(2&3), 105–225.Google Scholar
  10. Duschl, R. A.: 1988, 'Abandoning the Scientistic Legacy of Science Education', Science Education 72(1), 51–62.Google Scholar
  11. Duschl, R. A. & Gitomer, D. H.: 1997, 'Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms', Educational Assessment 4(1), 37–73.Google Scholar
  12. Duschl, R. A. Hamilton, R. J. & Grandy, R. E.: 1990, 'Psychology and Epistemology: Match or Mismatch When Applied to Science Education?', International Journal of Science Education 12(3), 220–243.Google Scholar
  13. Duschl, R. A., & Hamilton, R. J.: 1998, 'Conceptual Change in Science and the Learning of Science', in B. Fraser & K. Tobin, (eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  14. Fischer, K. W. & Bidell, T.: 1991, 'Constraining Nativist Inferences about Cognitive Capacities', in S. Carey & R. Gelman (eds.), The Epigenesis of Mind, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 199–235.Google Scholar
  15. Giere, R. N.: 1996, 'The Scientist as Adult', Philosophy of Science 63(4), 538–541.Google Scholar
  16. Gopnik, A.: 1988, 'Conceptual Change and Semantic Development as Theory Change: The Case of Object Premanance', Mind & Language 3(3), 197–216.Google Scholar
  17. Gopnik, A.: 1996a, 'The Post-Piaget Era', Psychological Science 7(4), 221–225.Google Scholar
  18. Gopnik, A.: 1996b, 'The Scientist as Child', Philosophy of Science 63(4), 485–514.Google Scholar
  19. Gopnik, A. & Meltzoff, A. N.: 1997, Words, Thoughts, and Theories, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Gottlieb, G.: 1991, 'Experiential Canalization of Behavioral Development: Theory', Developmental Psychology 27(1), 4–13.Google Scholar
  21. Greenough, W. T.: 1991, 'Evolution as a Component of Normal Development: Evolutionary Considerations', Developmental Psychology 27(1), 14–17.Google Scholar
  22. Hanson, N. R.: 1958, Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  23. Hull, D.: 1988, Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  24. Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J.: 1958, The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Karmiloff-Smith, A.: 1988, 'The Child is a Theoretician, Not an Inductivist', Mind & Language 3(3), 183–195.Google Scholar
  26. Kitcher, P.: 1993, The Advancement of Science; Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions, Oxford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Klahr, D., Fay, A. L. & Dunbar, K.: 1993, 'Heuristics for Scientific Experimentation: A Developmental Study', Cognitive Psychology 25, 111–146.Google Scholar
  28. Kuhn, D.: 1989, 'Children and Adults as Intuitive Scientists', Psychological Review 96, 674–689.Google Scholar
  29. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Laughlin, M.: 1988, The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Leslie, A. M. & Keeble, S.: 1987, 'Do Six-Month-Old Infants Perceive Causality?' Cognition X, 265–288.Google Scholar
  31. Lickliter, R. & Berry, T. D.: 1990, 'The Phylogeny Fallacy: Developmental Psychology's Misapplication of Evolutional Theory', Developmental Review 10, 348–364.Google Scholar
  32. Longino, H.: 1990, Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  33. Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. McClosky, M.: 1983, 'Intuitive Physics', Scientific American 248(4), 114–122.Google Scholar
  35. Metz, K. E.: 1991, 'Development of Explanation: Incremental and Fundmental Change in Children's Physics Knowledge', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 785–798.Google Scholar
  36. Metz, K. E.: 1993, 'Preschoolers' Developing Knowledge of the Pan Balance: From New Representation to Transformed Problem Solving', Cognition and Instruction 11(1) 31–93.Google Scholar
  37. Metz, K. E.: 1995, 'Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on Children's Science Instruction', Review of Educational Research 65(2), 93–127.Google Scholar
  38. Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Harcourt, Brace, & World, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L.: 1997, 'Building Functional Models: Designing an Elbow', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34(2), 125–143.Google Scholar
  40. Piaget, J.: 1952, The Origins of Intelligence in Children, International Universities Press, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Piéraut-Le Bonniec, G.: 1980, The Development of Modal Reasoning: Genesis of Necessity and Possibility Notions, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Pinker, S.: 1997, How the Mind Works, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Pfundt, H. & Duit, R.: 1994, Bibliography; Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education (4th ed.), Institute for Science Education, Kiel Germany.Google Scholar
  44. Posner, G., Strike, K. Hewson, P. & Gertzog, W.: 1982, 'Accomodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change', Science Education 66, 211–227.Google Scholar
  45. Rogoff, B.: 1982, 'Integrating Context and Cognitive Development', in M. Lamb & A. Brown (eds.), Advances in Developmental Psychology (Vol. 2), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  46. Samarapungavan, A. & Wiers, R.: 1994, 'Do Children Have Epistemic Constructs about Explanatory Frameworks: Examples from Naive Ideas About the Origin of Species', in A. Ram & K. Eiselt (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 778–783.Google Scholar
  47. Schauble, L.: 1990, 'Belief Revision in Children: The Role of Prior Knowledge and Strategies for Generating Evidence', Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 49, 31–57.Google Scholar
  48. Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R., Schultz, S. & John, J.: 1995, 'Students' Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom', The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(2) 131–166.Google Scholar
  49. Shapere, D.: 1982, 'The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy', Philosophy of Science 49, 485–525.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, C., Carey, S. & Wiser, M.: 1985, 'On Differentiation: A Case Study of the Development of the Concepts of Size, Weight, and Density', Cognition 21(3), 177–237.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, C. A. & Lazarus, R. S.: 1990, 'Emotion and Adaptation', in L. Pervin (ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, Guilford, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D. & Carey, S.: 1991, 'Young Children's Differentiation of Hypothetical Beliefs from Evidence', Child Development 62, 753–766.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, M., Esbensen, B. M. & Bennett, R. T.: 1994, 'Children's Understanding of Knowledge Acquisition: The Tendency for Children to Report that They Have Always Known What They Have Just Heard', Child Development 65, 1581–1604.Google Scholar
  54. Vygotsky, L. S.: 1978, Mind in Society, Harvard, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Duschl
    • 1
  • Gedeon O. Deaák
    • 1
  • Kirsten M. Ellenbogen
    • 1
  • Douglas L. Holton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Teaching & LearningVanderbilt University, Peabody CollegeNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Human DevelopmentVanderbilt University, Peabody CollegeNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations