Advertisement

Applied Categorical Structures

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 193–222 | Cite as

Bialgebras Over Noncommutative Rings and a Structure Theorem for Hopf Bimodules

  • Peter Schauenburg
Article

Abstract

It is a key property of bialgebras that their modules have a natural tensor product. More precisely, a bialgebra over k can be characterized as an algebra H whose category of modules is a monoidal category in such a way that the underlying functor to the category of k-vector spaces is monoidal (i.e. preserves tensor products in a coherent way). In the present paper we study a class of algebras whose module categories are also monoidal categories; however, the underlying functor to the category of k-vector spaces fails to be monoidal. Instead, there is a suitable underlying functor to the category of B-bimodules over a k-algebra B which is monoidal with respect to the tensor product over B. In other words, we study algebras L such that for two L-modules V and W there is a natural tensor product, which is the tensor product V⊗BW over another k-algebra B, equipped with an L-module structure defined via some kind of comultiplication of L. We show that this property is characteristic for ×B-bialgebras as studied by Sweedler (for commutative B) and Takeuchi. Our motivating example arises when H is a Hopf algebra and A an H-Galois extension of B. In this situation, one can construct an algebra L:=L(A,H), which was previously shown to be a Hopf algebra if B=k. We show that there is a structure theorem for relative Hopf bimodules in the form of a category equivalence \(_A M_A^H \cong {\text{ }}_L M\). The category on the left hand side has a natural structure of monoidal category (with the tensor product over A) which induces the structure of a monoidal category on the right hand side. The ×B-bialgebra structure of L that corresponds to this monoidal structure generalizes the Hopf algebra structure on L(A,H) known for B=k. We prove several other structure theorems involving L=L(A,H) in the form of category equivalences \(^L M \cong ^H M,{\text{ }}_A^L M \cong _k M{\text{, }}_A^L M_A \cong M_H ,{\text{ }}_A^L M^H \cong {\text{ }}M^H {\text{ and }}_A^L M_A^H \cong {\text{ }}YD_H^H \).

bialgebra Hopf algebra Hopf–Galois extension ×B-bialgebra monoidal category Hopf module 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beattie, M.: Strongly inner actions, coactions and duality theorems, Tsukuba J. Math. 16 (1992), 279–293.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blattner, R. J. and Montgomery, S.: Crossed products and Galois extensions of Hopf algebras, Pacific J. Math. 137 (1989), 37–54.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caenepeel, S., van Oystaeyen, F. and Zhang, Y. H.: Quantum Yang–Baxter module algebras, K-Theory 8 (1994), 231–255.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doi, Y.: Braided bialgebras and quadratic bialgebras, Comm. Algebra 21 (1993), 1731–1749.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doi, Y. and Takeuchi, M.: Hopf–Galois extensions of algebras, the Miyashita–Ulbrich action, and Azumaya algebras, J. Algebra 121 (1989), 488–516.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Montgomery, S.: Hopf Algebras and Their Actions on Rings, in CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Vol. 82, AMS, Providence, RI, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pareigis, B.: A non-commutative non-cocommutative Hopf algebra in ‘nature’, J. Algebra 70 (1981), 356–374.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schauenburg, P.: Hopf modules and Yetter–Drinfel’dmodules, J. Algebra 169 (1994), 874–890.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schauenburg, P.: Hopf Bigalois extensions, Comm. Algebra 24 (1996), 3797–3825.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schauenburg, P.: Hopf bimodules over Hopf–Galois-extensions, Miyashita–Ulbrich actions, and monoidal center constructions, Comm. Algebra 24 (1996), 143–163.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schneider, H.-J.: Principal homogeneous spaces for arbitrary Hopf algebras, Israel J. Math. 72 (1990), 167–195.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schneider, H.-J.: Representation theory of Hopf–Galois extensions, Israel J. Math. 72 (1990), 196–231.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montgomery, S. and Schneider, H.-J.: Hopf crossed products, rings of quotients, and prime ideals, Adv. in Math. 112 (1995), 1–55.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sweedler, M. E.: Hopf Algebras, Benjamin, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sweedler, M. E.: Groups of simple algebras, Publ. Math. I.H.E.S. 44 (1974), 79–189.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Takeuchi, M.: Groups of algebras over A ⊗ A, J. Math. Soc. Japan 29 (1977), 459–492.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ulbrich, K.-H.: Galoiserweiterungen von nicht-kommutativen Ringen, Comm. Algebra 10 (1982), 655–672.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ulbrich, K.-H.: Galois extensions as functors of comodules, Manuscripta Math. 59 (1987), 391–397.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ulbrich, K.-H.: Fiber functors of finite dimensional comodules, Manuscripta Math. 65 (1989), 39–46.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Oystaeyen, F. and Zhang, Y.: Galois-type correspondences for Hopf–Galois extensions, K-Theory 8 (1994), 257–269.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woronowicz, S. L.: Differential calculus on compact matrix pseudogroups (quantum groups), Comm. Math. Phys. 122 (1989), 125–170.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Schauenburg
    • 1
  1. 1.Mathematisches Institut der Universität MünchenMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations