System Thoughts in Manufacturing
In this paper we present a taxonomy of manufacturing problems, labeled in a general sense as Design, Production, or Distribution problems. One or more basic systems concepts, such as complexity and adaptation, attach themselves to each such problems. By combining the hierarchical Design—Production—Distribution idea with system concepts, we establish the fact that there is, indeed, a significant systems component to most problems of modern manufacturing.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.N. Assimakopoylos, “The routing and cost of the information flow in a System.” Systems Practice 1(3), pp. 297–303, 1988.Google Scholar
- 2.N. Assimakopoulos. “Asystems approach for hierarchically organized systems.” Analyse de System 18(3-4), pp. 3–13, 1992.Google Scholar
- 3.E. Bloch, “Workplace of the future.” lEEE Transactions on Industry Applications IA(20), pp. 8–10, 1984.Google Scholar
- 4.J. Browne, et al., “Classification of flexible manufacturing systems,” in Manufacturing Systems: Context, Applications, and Techniques, V. Vignell (ed.), Blackwell: Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
- 5.J. Hatvany, et al., “The computer-controlled manufacturing cell-Achievements, possibilities, and perspective,” in Proceedings of 9th IFAC Congress, Budapest, 1984.Google Scholar
- 6.R. May, 1973. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1973.Google Scholar
- 8.R. Rosen, 1978. Fundamentals of Measurement and Representation of Natural Systems. North-Holland: New York, 1978.Google Scholar
- 9.J. Solberg, et al., “Factories of the future: Defining the target,” CIDMAC Report, Computer Integrated Design Manufacturing and Automation Center, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN, January 1985.Google Scholar
- 11.H. Yoshikawa, K. Rathmill, and J. Hatvany, 1982. Computer-Aided Manufacturing: An International Comparison. National Academy Press: National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1982.Google Scholar