Across-the-Board (ATB) movement from coordinate structures is usually subject to an identity requirement: the same element must be extracted from each conjunct. In this paper I show that there are cases in which the identity requirement appears not to be met, in that different answers can be felicitously given to a single ATB question. I show that the non-ATB readings are instances of sloppy identity of the argument of a functional wh, and are subject to grammatical restrictions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Chierchia, Gennaro: 1993, ‘Questions with Quantifiers’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 181–234.
Engdahl, Elisabet: 1986, Constituent Questions, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1984, Studies in the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Academisch Proefschrift, University of Amsterdam.
Heim, Irene: 1997, ‘Predicates or Formulas? Evidence from Ellipsis’, in A. Lawson and E. Cho (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 7, Cornell University, CLC Publications, Ithaca.
Hornstein, Norbert: 1994, Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism, Blackwell, Oxford.
Munn, Alan: 1992, ‘A Null Operator Analysis of ATB Gaps’, The Linguistics Review 9, 1–26.
Sharvit, Yael: to appear, ‘Functional Relative Clauses’, Linguistics and Philosophy.
Williams, Edwin: 1978, ‘Across-the-Board Rule Application’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 31–43.
About this article
Cite this article
Munn, A. ON THE IDENTITY REQUIREMENT OF ATB EXTRACTION. Natural Language Semantics 7, 421–425 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008377429394
- Coordinate Structure
- Identity Requirement
- Sloppy Identity
- Grammatical Restriction