User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 251–303 | Cite as

Tailoring the Interaction with Users in Web Stores

  • Liliana Ardissono
  • Anna Goy
Article

Abstract

We describe the user modeling and personalization techniques adopted in SETA, a prototype toolkit for the construction of adaptive Web stores which customize the interaction with users. The Web stores created using SETA suggest the items best fitting the customers' needs and adapt the layout and the description of the store catalog to their preferences and expertise. SETA uses stereotypical information to handle the user models and applies personalization rules to dynamically generate the hypertextual pages presenting products. The system adapts the graphical aspect, length and terminology used in the descriptions to parameters like the user's receptivity, expertise and interests. Moreover, it maintains a model associated with each person the goods are selected for; in this way, multiple criteria can be applied for tailoring the selection of items to the preferences of their beneficiaries.

adaptive hypermedia customization of Web stores electronic shopping knowledge-based approaches to the personalization of the interaction personalized information presentation user modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, M., Billsus, D., Gaffney, S., Hettich, S., Khoo, G., Kim, D., Klefstad, R., Lowe, C., Ludeman, A., Muramatzu, J., Omori, K., Pazzani, M., Semler, D., Starr, B. and Yap, P.: 1997, Learning Probabilistic User Profiles. AI Magazine Summer, 47-55.Google Scholar
  2. AIMedia: 1999, @MEDIA, Communicating on InteractiveMedia. http://www.aimedia.org.Google Scholar
  3. André, E. and Rist, T.: 2000, Presenting through performing: on the use of multiple lifelike characters in Knowledge-based presentation systems. In: Proc. 2000 Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'00). New Orleans, Louisiana, 1-8.Google Scholar
  4. Ardissono, L., Barbero, C., Goy, A. and Petrone, G.: 1999a, An agent architecture for personalized Web stores. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents (Agents '99). Seattle, WA, 182-189.Google Scholar
  5. Ardissono, L., Console, L. and Torre, I.: 2000, On the application of personalization techniques to news servers on the WWW. In: E. Lamma and P. Mello (eds.): AI*IA: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence N. 1792. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 261-272.Google Scholar
  6. Ardissono, L. and Goy, A.: 1999, Tailoring the interaction with users in electronic shops. In: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on User Modeling. Banff, Canada, 35-44.Google Scholar
  7. Ardissono, L. and Goy, A.: 2000, Dynamic generation of adaptive Web catalogs. In: Proc. International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems (AH 2000). Trento, Italy, 5-16.Google Scholar
  8. Ardissono, L., Goy, A., Meo, R., Petrone, G., Console, L., Lesmo, L., Simone, C. and Torasso, P.: 1999b, A configurable system for the construction of adaptive virtual stores. World Wide Web 2(3), 143-159.Google Scholar
  9. Ardissono, L. and Torasso, P.: 2000, Dynamic user modeling in a Web store shell. In: Proc. 14th Conf. ECAI. Berlin, 621-625.Google Scholar
  10. Balabanovic, M.: 1998, Exploring versus Exploiting when Learning User Models for Text Recommendation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 8, 71-102.Google Scholar
  11. Bauer, M.: 1999, From interaction data to plan libraries: a clustering approach. In: Proc. 16th IJCAI. Stockholm, Sweden, 962-967.Google Scholar
  12. Bental, D., Cawsey, A., Pearson, J. and Jones, R.: 2000, Adapting Web-based information to the needs of patients with cancer. In: Proc. International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems (AH 2000). Trento, Italy, 73-85.Google Scholar
  13. Benyon, D.: 1993, Adaptive Systems: a Solution to Usability Problems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 3, 65-87.Google Scholar
  14. Billsus, D. and Pazzani, M.: 1999, A Personal News Agent that Talks, Learns and Explains. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents (Agents '99). Seattle, WA, 268-275.Google Scholar
  15. Boyle, C. and Encarnacion, A.: 1994, Metadoc: An Adaptive Hypertext Reading System. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(4), 1-19.Google Scholar
  16. Brusilovsky, P.: 1996, Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(2-3), 87-129.Google Scholar
  17. Burke, R., Hammond, K. and Young, B.: 1997, The FindMe Approach to Assisted Browsing. IEEE Expert, 32-39.Google Scholar
  18. Calvi, L.: 1997, Multifunctional (Hyper)Books: a Cognitive Perspective (on the User's Side). In: Proc. Workshop ``Adaptive Systems and User Modeling on the World Wide Web''. Chia Laguna, Italy, 23-30.Google Scholar
  19. Carberry, S., Chu-Carroll, J. and Elzer, S.: 1999, Constructing and utilizing a model of user preferences in collaborative consultation dialogues. Computational Intelligence 15(3), 185-217.Google Scholar
  20. Cheverest, K., Davies, N., Mitchell, K. and Smith, P.: 2000, Providing tailored (context-aware) information to city visitors. In: Proc. International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems (AH 2000). Trento, Italy, 73-85.Google Scholar
  21. Chittaro, L. and Ranon, R.: 2000, Adding Adaptive Features to Virtual Reality Interfaces for E-Commerce. In: Proc. International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems (AH 2000). Trento, Italy, 86-97.Google Scholar
  22. Cotter, P. and Smyth, B.: 2000, Personalisation technologies for the digital TV world. In: Proc. 14th Conf. ECAI. Berlin, 701-705.Google Scholar
  23. Dale, R., Green, S., Milosavljevic, M. and Paris, C.: 1998, Dynamic Document Delivery: Generating Natural Language Texts on Demand. In: Proc. 9th Int. Conf. and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'98). Vienna.Google Scholar
  24. De Carolis, B.: 1998, Introducing reactivity in adaptive hypertext generation. In: Proc. 13th Conf. ECAI. Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Fink, J. and Kobsa, A.: 2000, A Review and Analysis of Commercial User Modeling Servers for Personalization on the World Wide Web, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 10(2-3), Special Issue on Deployed User Modeling, 209-249.Google Scholar
  26. Fink, J., Kobsa, A. and Nill, A.: 1998, Adaptable and adaptive information for all users, including disabled and elderly people. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 4, 163-188.Google Scholar
  27. Fu, X., Budzik, J. and Hammond, K.: 2000, Mining navigation history for recommendation. In: Proc. 2000 Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'00). New Orleans, Louisiana, 106-112.Google Scholar
  28. Goecks, J. and Shavlik, J.: 2000, Learning users' interests by unobtrusively observing their normal behavior. In: Proc. 2000 Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'00). New Orleans, Louisiana, 129-132.Google Scholar
  29. Greening, D.: 2000, LikeMinds: Building Consumer Trust with Accurate Product Recommendations. http://likeminds.com/technology/white papers/websell/.Google Scholar
  30. Hirst, G., DiMarco, C., Hovy, E. and Parsons, K.: 1997, Authoring and Generating Health-Education Documents that are Tailored to the Needs of the Individual Patient. In: Proc. 6th Conf. on User Modeling. Chia Laguna, Italy, 107-118.Google Scholar
  31. Jameson, A., Schäfer, R., Simons, J. and Weis, T.: 1995, Adaptive provision of evaluation-oriented information: tasks and techniques. In: Proc. 14th IJCAI. Montreal, 1886-1893.Google Scholar
  32. Jennings, N., Sycara, K. and Wooldridge, M.: 1998, A roadmap of agent research and development. In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 275-306.Google Scholar
  33. Joerding, T.: 1998, Intelligent multimedia presentations in the web: fun without annoyance. In: Proc. of the 7th World Wide Web Conference (WWW7). Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  34. Joerding, T.: 1999, A temporary user modeling approach for adaptive shopping on the Web. In: Proc. 2nd Workshop on Adaptive Systems and User Modeling on the World Wide Web. Banff, Canada, 75-79.Google Scholar
  35. Karunanithi, N. and Alspector, J.: 1997, Feature-based and clique-based user models for movie selection: a comparative study. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 7, 279-304.Google Scholar
  36. Kay, J.: 1994, Lies, damned lies and stereotypes: pragmatic approximations of users. In: Proc. 4th Conf. on User Modeling. Hyannis, MA, 175-184.Google Scholar
  37. Keeney, R. and Raiffa, H.: 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  38. Kobsa, A.: 1990, Modeling the user's conceptual knowledge in BGP-MS, a user modeling shell system. Computational Intelligence 6, 193-208.Google Scholar
  39. Kobsa, A., Koenemann, J. and Pohl, W. Personalized hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationships. The Knowledge Engineering Review. To appear.Google Scholar
  40. Kobsa, A., Müler, D. and Nill, A.: 1994, KN-AHS: an adaptive hypertext client of the user modeling system BGP-MS. In: Proc. 4th Conf. on UserModeling. Hyannis, MA, 99-105.Google Scholar
  41. Lesmo, L., Saitta, L. and Torasso, P.: 1985, Evidence combination in expert systems. Int. Journal of Man-Machine Studies 22, 307-326.Google Scholar
  42. Linden, G., Hanks, S. and Lesh, N.: 1997, Interactive assessment of user preference models: the automated travel assistant. In: Proc. 6th Conf. on UserModeling. Chia Laguna, Italy, 67-78.Google Scholar
  43. Linton, F., Joy, D. and Schafer, H.: 1999, Building user and expert models by long-term observation of application usage. In: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on User Modeling. Banff, Canada, 129-138.Google Scholar
  44. Miller, C.: 2000, Rules of etiquette, or how a mannerly AUI should comport itself to gain social acceptance and be perceived as gracious and well-behaved in polite society. In: Working Notes of the ``Adaptive User Interfaces'' Spring Symposium of AAAI (Technical Report SS-00-01). Stanford, CA, 80-81.Google Scholar
  45. Milosavljevic, M. and Oberlander, J.: 1998, Dynamic hypertext catalogues: helping users to help themselves. In: Proc. the 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HT'98). Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  46. Milosavljevic, M., Tulloch, A. and Dale, R.: 1996, Text generation in a dynamic hypertext environment. In: Proc. 19th Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC'96). Melbourne, 417-426.Google Scholar
  47. Molino, G., Molino, F., Torasso, P., Console, L., Ardissono, L. and Pogliano, P.: 1992, Com puter assisted development of diagnostic expert systems. A domain independent package (EMPTY) for acquisition and use of expert's medical knowledge. In: Proc. 16th Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care. Baltimore, 344-348.Google Scholar
  48. Neapolitan, R.: 1994, Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems. New York: JohnWiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  49. Net Perceptions, I., Net Perceptions. http://www.netperception.com.Google Scholar
  50. ObjectSpace: 2000, Voyager. http://www.objectspace.com/index.asp.Google Scholar
  51. Orwant, J.: 1995, Heterogenous learning in the Doppelgaänger user modeling system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(2), 107-130.Google Scholar
  52. Paliouras, G., Karkaletsis, V., Papatheodorou, C. and Spyropolous, C.: 1999, Exploiting learning techniques for the acquisition of user stereotypes and communities. In: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on User Modeling. Banff, Canada, 169-178.Google Scholar
  53. Paliouras, G., Papatheodorou, C., Karkaletsis, V., Tzitziras, P. and Spyropolous, C.: 2000, Large-Scale mining of usage data on Web sites. In: Working Notes of the ``Adaptive User Interfaces'' Spring Symposium of AAAI (Technical Report SS-00-01). Stanford, CA, 92-97.Google Scholar
  54. Paris, C.: 1988, Tailoring object descriptions to a user's level of expertise, Computational Linguistics 14(3), 64-78.Google Scholar
  55. Pearl, J.: 1988, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
  56. Pohl, W. and Nick, A.: 1999, Machine learning and knowledge representation in the LabouUr approach to user modeling. In: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on User Modeling. Banff, Canada, 179-188.Google Scholar
  57. Popp, H. and Lödel, D.: 1996, Fuzzy techniques and user modeling in sales assistants, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6, 349-370.Google Scholar
  58. Raskutti, B., Beitz, A. and Ward, B.: 1997, A feature-based approach to recommending selections based on past preferences. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 7, 179-218.Google Scholar
  59. Reiter, E.: 1995, NLG vs. templates. In: Proc. of the 5th. Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  60. Resnick, P. and Varian, H. (eds.): 1997, Special Issue on Recommender Systems, Vol. 40. Communications of the ACM.Google Scholar
  61. Rich, E.: 1989, Stereotypes and user modeling. In: A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (eds.): User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 35-51.Google Scholar
  62. Riecken, D. (ed.): 2000, Special Issue on Personalization, Vol. 43. Communications of the ACM.Google Scholar
  63. Specht, M. and Kobsa, A.: 1999, Interaction of domain expertise and interface design in adaptive educational hypermedia. In: Proc. 2nd Workshop on adaptive systems and user modeling on the World Wide Web. Banff, Canada, 88-93.Google Scholar
  64. Spink, A., Bateman, J. and Jansen, B.: 1999, Searching the Web: Survey of Excite users. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 9(2), 117-128.Google Scholar
  65. Sycara, K., Pannu, A., Williamson, M. and Zeng, D.: 1996, Distributed intelligent agents. IEEE Expert December, 36-45.Google Scholar
  66. Torasso, P. and Console, L.: 1989, Diagnostic Problem Solving. North Oxford Academic.Google Scholar
  67. Vassileva, J.: 1996, A task-centered approach for user modeling in a hypermedia of¢ce documentation system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(2-3), 185-223.Google Scholar
  68. Wilkinson, R., Lu, S., Paradis, F., Paris, C., Wan, S. and Wu, M.: 2000, Generating personal travel guides from discourse plans. In: Proc. International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems (AH 2000). Trento, Italy, 392-85.Google Scholar
  69. Ygge, F.: 1999, Software agent for electronic power trade. In: Proc. of the Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce (AMEC) SIG-Meeting of AGENTLINK. Barcelona.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liliana Ardissono
    • 1
  • Anna Goy
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations