Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 173–192 | Cite as

Joint Stiffness Control of a Two-Link Flexible Arm

  • J. Pun
  • S. E. Semercigil

Abstract

In this study, results are presented for the control of impactinduced transient oscillations on a two-link flexible arm by varying thestiffness of an elbow actuator. Case studies were conducted to determinethe effectiveness of the control method as various arm parameters suchas payload, length, elbow angle, and elbow stiffness changed. Theresults of selected cases were then verified experimentally anddemonstrated that the suggested controller was effective, robust, andquite insensitive to parameter variations.

vibration control multi-link robotic arms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Warkentin, A. and Semercigil, S. E., ‘Variable stiffness control of a single link flexible robotic arm’, Journal of Sound and Vibration 187, 1995, 1–21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, D. and Vidyasagar, M., ‘Passive control of a stiff flexible link’, International Journal of Robotics Research 11(12), 1992, 572–578.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chapnik, B. V., Heppler, G. R., and Aplevich, J. D., ‘Controlling the impact response of a one-link flexible robotic arm’, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 9(6), 1993, 347–351.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kwon, D. S. and Book, W., ‘A time-domain inverse dynamic tracking control of a single-link flexible manipulator’, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 116(6), 1994, 193–200.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khorasani, K., ‘Adaptive control of flexible joint robots’, in Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 4, 1991, pp. 2127–2134.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koivo, A. J. and Lee, K. S., ‘Self-tuning control of a two-link manipulator with a flexible forearm’, International Journal of Robotics Research 11(8), 1992, 383–395.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alder, L. J. and Rock, S. M., ‘Experiments in control of a flexible-link robotic manipulator with unknown payload dynamics: An adaptive approach’, International Journal of Robotics Research 13(12), 1994, 481–495.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hallauer, L. Jr. and Wagle, D. A., ‘Inexpensive experiment for undergraduates on active control of structural vibrations’, in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 1989, pp. 433–435.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, J. C., ‘Response of large space structures with stiffness control’, Journal of Spacecraft 21(5), 1984, 463–467.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Onoda, J., Endo, T., Tamaoki, H., and Watanabe, N., ‘Vibration suppression by variable-stiffness members’, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal 29(6), 1991, 977–983.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andeen, B. (ed.), Robot Design Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tal, J., Motion Control Applications, Galil Motion Control, Palo Alto, CA, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thompson, W. T, Theory of Vibration with Applications, 4th edition, Prentice-Hall Canada, Toronto, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turkstra, T. P. and Semercigil, S. E., ‘Vibration analysis routines for radially symmetric beams’, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, Report MEDV901, 1990.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Craig, R. Jr., Structural Dynamics: An Introduction to Computer Methods, Wiley, New York, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Pun
    • 1
  • S. E. Semercigil
    • 1
  1. 1.School of the Built Environment – Mechanical EngineeringVictoria University of TechnologyMCMC, MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations