Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 219–247 | Cite as

Measurement Error and Nonlinearity in the Earnings-Returns Relation

  • Messod Beneish
  • Campbell Harvey


There is a long history of research which examines the relation between unexpected earnings and unexpected returns on common stock. Early literature used simple linear regression models to describe this relation. Recently, a number of authors have proposed nonlinear models. These authors find that the earnings-returns relation is approximately linear for small changes but is 'S'-shaped globally. However, unexpected earnings are generated by the sum of a measurement error and a true earnings innovation, so the apparent nonlinearity could be an artifact of nonlinearity in the measurement errors. Using a research design that minimizes the presence of measurement errors, we provide evidence consistent with the hypothesis that measurement errors contribute to the nonlinearities in the earnings-returns relation. While we are not suggesting that the earnings-returns relation is linear, our evidence suggests that there is no advantage to using a nonlinear model for large firms that are widely followed by analysts.

measurement error unexpected earnings nonparametric estimation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abarbanell, J.S., W.N. Lanen and R.E. Verrechia, “Analysts' forecasts as proxies for investor beliefs in empirical research.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 20, 31–60, (1996).Google Scholar
  2. Abdel-khalik, A.R. “Specification problems with information content of earnings: revisions and rationality of expectations and self-selection bias.” Contemporary Accounting Research 7, 142–172 (1990).Google Scholar
  3. Ball, R., S.P. Kothari and R.L. Watts, “Economic determinants of the relation between earnings changes and stock returns.” The Accounting Review 68, 622–638, (1993).Google Scholar
  4. Beneish, M.D., “Stock prices and the dissemination of analysts' recommendations.” Journal of Business 64, 393–416, (1991).Google Scholar
  5. Beneish, M.D. and C.R. Harvey, “A new approach to estimating the earnings response function.” Working paper, Duke University, (1990).Google Scholar
  6. Bernard, V.L. and J.K. Thomas, “Post-announcement drift: Delayed price response or risk premium?” Journal of Accounting Research 27, 1–36, (1989).Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L.D., “Earnings Forecasting Research: Its Implications for Capital Markets Research.” Journal of International Forecasting 9, 295–320, (1993).Google Scholar
  8. Brown, L., P. Griffin, R. Hagerman, and M. Zmijewski, “Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time series models in forecasting quarterly earnings.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 9, 61–87, (1987).Google Scholar
  9. Cacoullos, T., “Estimation of a multivariate density.” Annals of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics 18, 176–189, (1996).Google Scholar
  10. Chambers, A.E. and Penman, S.H., “Timeliness of reporting and the stock price reaction to earnings announcements.” Journal of Accounting Research 22, 21–47, (1984).Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, C.S.A., W.S. Hopwood and J.C. McKeown, “Nonlinearity and specification problems in unexpected earnings response regression model.” The Accounting Review 67, 379–398, (1992).Google Scholar
  12. Cleveland, W.S. and S.J. Devlin, “Locally weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting.” Journal of the American Statistical Assocation 83, 596–609, (1988).Google Scholar
  13. Collins, D.W. and S.P. Kothari, “An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, 143–181, (1989).Google Scholar
  14. Cornell, B., and Landsman, W.R., “Security price response to quarterly earnings announcements and analysts' forecast revisions.” The Accounting Review 64, 680–692, (1989).Google Scholar
  15. Christie, A.A., “On cross-sectional analysis in accounting research” Journal of Accounting and Economics 9, 231–258, (1987).Google Scholar
  16. Das, S. and B. Lev, “Nonlinearity in the returns-earnings relation: Tests of alternative specification and explanations.” Contemporary Accounting Review 11, 353–379, (1994).Google Scholar
  17. Easton, P. and M. Zmijewski, “Cross-sectional variation in the stock market response to accounting earnings announcements.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, 117–141, (1989).Google Scholar
  18. Fama, E.F. and K.R. French, “Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics 25, 23–50, (1989).Google Scholar
  19. Fama, E.F. and K.R. French, “The cross section of expected returns.” Journal of Finance 42, 427–466, (1992).Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, R.N. and S. Tse, “A nonlinear model of security price responses to unexpected earnings.” Journal of Accounting Research 30, 185–209, (1992).Google Scholar
  21. Fukunaga, K., Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  22. Gallant, A.R., “On the bias in flexible functional forms and an essentially unbiased form: The Fourier flexible form.” Journal of Econometrics 15, 211–224, (1981).Google Scholar
  23. Granger, C.W.J. and P. Newbold, Forecasting economic time series, New York: Academic Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  24. Hansen, L.P., “Large sample properties of generalized method of moment estimators.” Econometrica 50, 1029–1054, (1982).Google Scholar
  25. Härdle, W., Applied Nonparametric Regression. Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  26. Hughes, J.S. and Ricks, W.E., “Association between forecast errors and excess returns near to earnings announcements.” The Accounting Review 62, 158–175, (1987).Google Scholar
  27. Keim, D.B. and R.F. Stambaugh, “Predicting returns in the bond and stock market.” Journal of Financial Economics 17, 357–390, (1986).Google Scholar
  28. Lang, M., “Time-varying stock price responses to earnings induced by uncertainty about the time-series properties of earnings.” Journal of Accounting Research 27, 229–257, (1991).Google Scholar
  29. Lev, B., “On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: Lessons and directions from two decades of empirical research.” Journal of Accounting Research Supplement 27, 153–192, (1989).Google Scholar
  30. Mizrach, B., “Multivariate nearest-neighbour forecasts of EMS exchange rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 7, S151–S163, (1992a).Google Scholar
  31. Mizrach, B., Forecast comparison in L2, Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, (1992b).Google Scholar
  32. Pagan, A. and G.W. Schwert, “Alternative models for conditional stock volatility.” Journal of Econometrics 45, 267–290, (1990).Google Scholar
  33. Parzen, E., “On the estimation of probability density and mode.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33, 1065–1076, (1962).Google Scholar
  34. Philbrick, D.R. and W.E. Ricks, “Using Value Line and IBES analysts forecasts in accounting research.” Journal of Accounting Research 29, 397–415, (1991).Google Scholar
  35. Schipper, K., “Analysts' forecasts.” Accounting Horizons 5, 105–121, (1991).Google Scholar
  36. Silverman, B.W., Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, London: Chapman and Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  37. White, H., “A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48, 817–838, (1980).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Messod Beneish
    • 1
  • Campbell Harvey
    • 2
  1. 1.Indiana UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Duke University and NBERUSA

Personalised recommendations