Minds and Machines

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 15–30 | Cite as

Rethinking Autonomy

  • Richard Alterman

Abstract

This paper explores the assumption of autonomy. Several arguments are presented against the assumption of runtime autonomy as a principle of design for artificial intelligence systems. The arguments vary from being theoretical, to practical, and to analytic. The latter parts of the paper focus on one strategy for building non-autonomous systems (the practice view). One critical theme is that intelligence is not located in the system alone, it emerges from a history of interactions among user, builder, and designer over a given set of data as mediated by the system. A second critical theme is that artificially intelligent systems are ongoing projects that must be continuously adapted and revised using joint person-machine efforts.

autonomy building systems users practice everyday activity artificial intelligence cognitive science 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alterman, R. (1998), Adaptive planning, Cognitive Science, 12, pp. 93-421.Google Scholar
  2. Alterman, R. Griffin, D. (1996), Improving case retrieval by remembering questions. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 678-683.Google Scholar
  3. Alterman, R. and Griffin, D. (1997), Improvement as a Function of Use. Technical Report TR-CS-95-182, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
  4. Alterman, R. Zito-Wolf, R. and Carpenter, T. (1998), Pragmatic Action. Cognitive Science, 22(1), pp. 53-105.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. R. (1982), Acquisition of Cognitive Skill, Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter, T. and Alterman, R. (1994), A Reading Agent. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, M. and Engestrom, Y. (1993), A Cultural Historic Approach to Distributed Cognition, In Salomon, G. ed, Distributed Cognitions, pp. 1-46, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, B. and Kahn, Jr., P. (1992), ‘Human agency and responsible computing: implications for computer system design’, Journal Systems Software 17, pp. 7-14.Google Scholar
  9. Grosz, B. (1996), Collaborative systems, Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 17, pp. 67-85.Google Scholar
  10. Grosz, B. and Kraus, S. (1996), Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action. Artificial Intelligence, 86, pp. 269-357.Google Scholar
  11. Grosz, B. and Sidner, C. (1990), Plans for discourse, In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack, Ed, Intentions in Communication, pp. 417-444, Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Guralnik, D. B. ed, (1970), Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition, World Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Hutchins, E. (1995), How a Cockpit Remembers its Speed, Cognitive Science, 19, pp. 265-288.Google Scholar
  14. Lave, J. (1988), Cognition in Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Norman, D. A. (1988), The Psychology of Everyday Things, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Norman, D. A. (1991), Cognitive Artifacts, In J. M. Carroll, ed, Designing Interaction, pp. 17-38. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Perkins, D. N. (1993), Person-Plus: A Distributed View of Thinking and Learning. In G. Salomon, ed, Distributed Cognitions, pp. 88-110, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pikes, R. E., Hart, P. E. and Nilsson, N. J. (1972), Learning and Executing Generalized Robot Plans. Artificial Intelligence, 3, pp. 251-288.Google Scholar
  19. Scribner, S. (1984), Studying Working Intelligence, In B. Rogoff and J. Lave, eds, Everyday Cognition, pp. 9-40, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Scribner, S. and Cole, M. (1981), The Psychology of Literacy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Shneiderman, B. (1995), ‘Looking for the bright side of agents’, ACM Interactions 2(1), pp. 13-15.Google Scholar
  22. Shneiderman, B. (1998), Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd ed, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., 639 pages. Related book site at <http://www.awl.com/DTUI>.Google Scholar
  23. Shneiderman, B. and Maes, P. (1997), ‘Direct manipulation vs. software agents: A debate’, ACM Interactions 4(6), pp. 42-61.Google Scholar
  24. Suchman, L. A. (1987), Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Terveen, L. G. (1995), Overview of Human-Computer Collaboration, Knowledge-Based Systems, 8(2-3), pp. 67-81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Alterman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations