Does Trading Volume Contain Information to Predict Stock Returns? Evidence from China's Stock Markets

  • Cheng F. Lee
  • Oliver M. Rui

Abstract

This paper examines empirical contemporaneous and causal relationships between trading volume, stock returns and return volatility in China's four stock exchanges and across these markets. We find that trading volume does not Granger-cause stock market returns on each of the markets. As for the cross-market causal relationship in China's stock markets, there is evidence of a feedback relationship in returns between Shanghai A and Shenzhen B stocks, and between Shanghai B and Shenzhen B stocks. Shanghai B return helps predict the return of Shenzhen A stocks. Shanghai A volume Granger-causes return of Shenzhen B. Shenzhen B volume helps predict the return of Shanghai B stocks. This paper also investigates the causal relationship among these three variables between China's stock markets and the US stock market and between China and Hong Kong. We find that US return helps predict returns of Shanghai A and Shanghai B stocks. US and Hong Kong volumes do not Granger-cause either return or volatility in China's stock markets. In short, information contained in returns, volatility, and volume from financial markets in the US and Hong Kong has very weak predictive power for Chinese financial market variables.

spillover China's Stock Markets trading volume 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agmon, T., “The Relations Among Equity Markets: A Study of Share Price Co-movement in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Japan.” Journal of Finance 27, 839–855, (1972).Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, T.G., “Return Volatility and Trading Volume: An Information Flow Interpretation of Stochastic Volatility.” Journal of Finance 51, 169–204, (1994).Google Scholar
  3. Ariel, R.A., “High Stock Returns Before Holidays: Existence and Evidence on Possible Causes.” Journal of Finance 45, 1611–1626, (1990).Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, W., “Risk and Return on China's New Stock Markets: Some Preliminary Evidence.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 2, 243–260, (1994).Google Scholar
  5. Becker, K.G., J.E. Finnerty, and M. Gupia, “The Intertemporal Relation Between the US and Japanese Stock Markets.” Journal of Finance 45, 1297–1306, (1990).Google Scholar
  6. Blume, L., D. Easley, and M. O'Hara, “Market Statistics and Technical Analysis: The Role of Volume.” Journal of Finance 49(1), 153–182, (1994).Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, J.Y., S.J. Grossman, and J. Wang, “Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 905–939, (1993).Google Scholar
  8. Chakravarty, S., A. Sarkar, and L.F. Wu, Information Asymmetry, Market Segmentation and Pricing of Crosslisted Shares; Theory and Evidence from Chinese A and B Shares, Working paper, Purdue University, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, G.M., B.S. Lee, and O.M. Rui, A Study of Market Segmentation due to Foreign Ownership Restrictions in Chinese Stock Markets: A-Share Premia or B-Share Discounts?,Working paper, University of Houston, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. Chui, C.W. and C.Y. Kwok, “Cross-Autocorrelation Between A Shares and B Shares in the Chinese Stock Market.” Journal of Financial Research 21, 333–353, (1998).Google Scholar
  11. Chordia, T. and B. Swaminathan, “Trading Vvolume and Cross-Autocorrelations in Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance forthcoming, (1999).Google Scholar
  12. Clark, P.K., “A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices.” Econometrica 41, 135–55, (1973).Google Scholar
  13. Copeland, T. E., “A Model of Asset Trading Under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival.” Journal of Finance 31, 1149–1168, (1976).Google Scholar
  14. Copeland, M. and T. Copeland, “Leads, Lags, and Trading in Global Markets.” Financial Analysts Journal 1998, 70–80, (1998).Google Scholar
  15. Crouch, R.L., “The Volume of Transaction and Price Changes on the New York Stock Exchange.” Financial Analysts Journal 26, 104–09, (1970).Google Scholar
  16. Cumby, R., S. Figlewski, and J. Hasbrouck, “Forecasting Volatility and Correlations with EGARCH Models.” Journal of Derivatives Winter, 21–63, (1993).Google Scholar
  17. Dickey, D.A. and W.A. Fuller, “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Journal of American Statistical Association 74, 427–31, (1979).Google Scholar
  18. Epps, T.W. and M.L. Epps, “The Stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and Transaction Volume: Implications for the Mixture-of-Distributions Hypothesis.” Econometrica 44, 305–21, (1976).Google Scholar
  19. Engle, R.F., “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of UK Inflation.” Econometrica 50, 987–1008, (1982).Google Scholar
  20. Eun, C., S. Shim, “International Transmission of Stock Market Movements.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 24, 241–56, (1989).Google Scholar
  21. French, K., “Stock Returns and the Weekend Effect.” Journal of Financial Economics 8, 55–69, (1980).Google Scholar
  22. Foster, F.D. and S. Viswanathan, “Can Speculative Trading Explain the Volume-Volatility Relation?” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 379-396, (1995).Google Scholar
  23. Fuller, W., Introduction to Statistical Time Series, New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  24. Gallant, A.R., P.E. Rossi, and G. Tauchen, “Stock Prices and Volume.” Review of Financial Studies 5, 199–242, (1992).Google Scholar
  25. Granger, C.W.J., “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods.” Econometrica 37, 424–438, (1969).Google Scholar
  26. Granger, C.W.J. and O. Morgenstern, “Spectral Analysis of New York Market Prices.” Kyklos 16, 1–27, (1963).Google Scholar
  27. Hamao, Y., R.W. Masulis, and V. Ng, “Correlations in Price Changes and Volatility Across International Stock Markets.” Review of Financial Studies 3, 281–307, (1990).Google Scholar
  28. Harris, L., “Cross-Security Tests of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21, 39–46, (1986).Google Scholar
  29. Haugh, L.D., “Checking the Independence of Two Covariance Stationary Time Series: A Univariate Residual Cross-Correlation Approach.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 71, 378–385, (1976).Google Scholar
  30. Hiemstra, C. and J.D. Jones, “Testing for Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality in the Stock Price-Volume Relation.” Journal of Finance 49, 1639–1664, (1994).Google Scholar
  31. Jaffe, J. and R. Westerfield, “The Weekend Effect in Common Stock Returns: The International Evidence.” Journal of Finance 40, 433–454, (1985).Google Scholar
  32. Jennings, R., L. Starks, and J. Fellingham, “An Equilibrium Model of Asset of Trading with Sequential Information Arrival.” Journal of Finance 36, 143–161, (1981).Google Scholar
  33. Jorion, P., “Predicting Volatility in the Foreign Exchange Market.” Journal of Finance 50, 507–528, (1995).Google Scholar
  34. Karpoff, J.M., “The Relation Between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 109–126, (1987).Google Scholar
  35. Keim, D.B. and R.F. Stambaugh, “A Further Investigation of the Weekend Effect in Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance 39, 819–840, (1984).Google Scholar
  36. King, M.A. and S. Wadhwani, “Transmission of Volatility Between Stock Markets.” Review of Financial Studies 3, 5–33, (1990).Google Scholar
  37. Lakonishok, J. and M. Levi, “Weekend Effects on Stock Return: A Note.” Journal of Finance 37, 883–889, (1982).Google Scholar
  38. Lakonishok, J. and E. Maberly, “The Weekend Effect: Trading Patterns of Individual and Institutional Investors.” The Journal of Finance 45, 231–243, (1990).Google Scholar
  39. Lakonishok, J. and S. Smidt, “Volume and Turn-of-the-Year Behavior.” Journal of Financial Economics 13, 435–455, (1984).Google Scholar
  40. Phillip, P.C.B. and P. Perron, “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression.” Biometrica 75, 335–346, (1988).Google Scholar
  41. Rogalski, R.J., “The Dependence of Prices andVolume.” Review of Economics and Statistics 60, 268–274, (1979).Google Scholar
  42. Tauchen, G.E. and M. Pitts, “The Price Variability-Volume Relationship on Speculative Markets.” Econometrica 51, 485–505, (1983).Google Scholar
  43. Sims, C.A., “Money, Income, and Causality.” American Economic Review 62, 540–552, (1972).Google Scholar
  44. Sims, C.A., “Comparison of Interwar and Postwar Business Cycles: Monetarism Reconsidered.” American Economic Review 70, 250–257, (1980).Google Scholar
  45. Wang, J., “A Model of Competitive Stock Trading Volume.” Journal of Political Economy 102, 127–168, (1994).Google Scholar
  46. Wood, R.A., T.H. McInish, and J.K. Ord, “An Investigation of Transaction Data for NYSE Stocks.” Journal of Finance 40, 723–741, (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheng F. Lee
    • 1
  • Oliver M. Rui
    • 2
  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong

Personalised recommendations