Artificial Intelligence and Law

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 17–35

Norms in artificial decision making

  • Magnus Boman


A method for forcing norms onto individual agents in a multi-agent system is presented. The agents under study are supersoft agents: autonomous artificial agents programmed to represent and evaluate vague and imprecise information. Agents are further assumed to act in accordance with advice obtained from a normative decision module, with which they can communicate. Norms act as global constraints on the evaluations performed in the decision module and hence no action that violates a norm will be suggested to any agent. Further constraints on action may then be added locally. The method strives to characterise real-time decision making in agents, in the presence of risk and uncertainty.

norm constraint real-time decision making decisions with risk decisions under uncertainty vague information policy social space 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Axelrod, R. 1986. An evolutionary approach to norms, American Political Science Review 80(4), 1095-1111.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, J. 1993. Morality and Rational Choice, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, J. 1994. Nonconsequentialist decisions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17(1).Google Scholar
  4. Boman, M. and Ekenberg, L. 1995. Decision making agents with relatively unbounded rationality, In Proc DIMAS'95, AGH, Krakow, pp. I/28-I/35.Google Scholar
  5. Boman, M. 1996. Implementing Norms through Normative Advice, In Proc ICMAS'96/IMSA'96 WS on Norms, Obligations, and Conventions.Google Scholar
  6. Boman, M. 1997. Norms as constraints on real-time autonomous agent action, In M. Boman & W. Van de Velde (eds.), Multi-Agent Rationality (Proc MAAMAW'97), LNAI 1237, Springer-Verlag, pp. 36-44.Google Scholar
  7. Conte, R. and Castelfranchi, C. 1995. Cognitive and Social Action, UCL Press, London.Google Scholar
  8. Danielson, M. 1997. Computational Decision Analysis, Ph.D. diss., DSV, KTH, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  9. Danielson, M. and Ekenberg, L. 1997. A framework for analysing decisions under risk, European Journal of Operations Research. To appear.Google Scholar
  10. Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M., and Boman, M. 1996. From local assessments to global rationality, Intelligent Cooperative Information Systems 5(2&3), 315-331.Google Scholar
  11. Ekenberg, L. 1996. Modelling decentralised decision making, In Proc ICMAS'96, AAAI Press, pp. 64-71.Google Scholar
  12. Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M., and Boman, M. 1997. Imposing security constraints on agent-based decision support, Decision Support Systems 20, 3-15.Google Scholar
  13. Ekenberg, L., Boman, M., and Linnerooth-Bayer, J. 1997. Catastrophic risk evaluation, IIASA Report No. IR-97-045. Intl Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  14. Jennings, N.R. 1992. Towards a cooperation knowledge level for collaborative problem solving, In Proc 10th ECAI, 224-228.Google Scholar
  15. Jennings, N.R. and Campos, J.R. 1997. Towards a social level characterisation of socially responsible agents, In IEEE Proc on Software Engineering, Vol. 144,No. 1, pp. 11-25.Google Scholar
  16. Kalenka, S. and Jennings, N.R. 1997. Socially responsible decision making by autonomous agents, In Proc ICCS'97.Google Scholar
  17. Laskey, K. and Lehner, P. 1994. Metareasoning and the problem of small worlds, IEEE Trans on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 24, 1643-1652.Google Scholar
  18. Lavoie, M. 1992. Foundations of Post-Keynesian Analysis, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Malmnäs, P.-E. 1995. Methods of Evaluations in Supersoft Decision Theory. Unpublished manuscript, available on the WWW using URL: mab/DECIDE.Google Scholar
  20. Rasmusen, E. 1994. Games and Information, 2nd edn, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Savage, L. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  22. Simon, H.A. 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Walter, J. 1997. A Decision Tool for Uncertain Decision Making, M. Sc. thesis, NADA, KTH, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  24. Wellman, M.P. 1996. Market-oriented programming: Some early lessons, In S. Clearwater (ed.) Market-Based Control, pp. 74-95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magnus Boman
    • 1
  1. 1.The DECIDE Research Group, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University and the Royal Institute of TechnologyKistaSweden

Personalised recommendations