Crime, Law and Social Change

, 32:83 | Cite as

Prostitution control in America: Rethinking public policy

  • Ronald Weitzer


In the past two decades there has been little critical examination of the prevailing methods of controlling prostitution in the United States. This article examines selected problems in the control of prostitution in the United States and critically assesses three major alternatives to the prevailing policy of criminalization. Alternative approaches are evaluated using the criteria of public preferences, efficient use of criminal justice resources, and harm reduction. One policy, involving a dualistic approach, is found to be superior in satisfying these criteria.


  1. A&E [Arts and Entertainment Network], “Red Light Districts,” Videotape, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. American Law Institute, Model Penal Code and Commentaries, Part II, Sections 240.0 to 251.4, (Philadelphia: American Law Institute, 1980).Google Scholar
  3. Atchison, C., L. Fraser and J. Lowman, “Men Who Buy Sex,” in J. Elias, V. Bullough, V. Elias and G. Brewer (eds.), Prostitution, (Amherst: Prometheus, 1998).Google Scholar
  4. Atlanta Task Force on Prostitution, Findings and Recommendations, (Mayor's Office: Atlanta, Georgia, 1986).Google Scholar
  5. Barnard, M., “Violence and Vulnerability: Conditions of Work for Street Working Prostitutes,” Sociology of Health and Illness 1993, 15, 683–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennetto, J., “Community Work the Best Penalty for Vice, say Police,” The Independent [London], October 21, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. Benson, C. and R. Matthews, “Street Prostitution: Ten Facts in Search of a Policy,” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 1995, 23, 395–415.Google Scholar
  8. Benson, C. and R. Matthews, Report of the Parliamentary Group on Prostitution, (London: Middlesex University, 1996).Google Scholar
  9. Bernat, F., “New York State's Prostitution Statute: Case Study of the Discriminatory Application of a Gender Neutral Law,” in C. Schweber and C. Feinman (eds.), Criminal Justice Politics and Women, (New York: Haworth, 1985).Google Scholar
  10. Boles, J. and C. Tatro, “Legal and Extralegal Methods of Controlling Female Prostitution: A Cross-Cultural Comparison,” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 1978, 2, 71–85.Google Scholar
  11. Boyer, D., L. Chapman and B. Marshall, Survival Sex in King County: Helping Women Out, Report submitted to the King County Women's Advisory Board, March 1993.Google Scholar
  12. Braithwaite, J., Crime, Shame, and Reintegration, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  13. Bryan, J., “Occupational Ideologies and Individual Attitudes of Call Girls,” Social Problems 1996, 13, 441–450.Google Scholar
  14. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, annual).Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, R., “Invisible Men: Making Visible Male Clients of Female Prostitutes in Merseyside,” in J. Elias, V. Bullough, V. Elias and G. Brewer (eds.), Prostitution, (Amherst: Prometheus, 1998).Google Scholar
  16. Caughey, M., “The Principle of Harm and its Application to Laws Criminalizing Prostitution,” Denver Law Journal 1974, 51, 235–262.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, C., “Prostitution,” Congressional Quarterly Researcher 1993, 3, 505–527.Google Scholar
  18. Coalition of San Francisco Business and Neighborhood Communities Impacted by Prostitution, Resolution, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. Comment, “Privacy and Prostitution,” Iowa Law Review 1977, 63, 248–265.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, B., Deviant Street Networks: Prostitution in New York City, (Lexington, MA: Lexington, 1980).Google Scholar
  21. Davis, N.J., “From Victims to Survivors: Working with Recovering Street Prostitutes,” in R. Weitzer (ed.), Sex for Sale: Prostitution, Pornography, and the Sex Industry, (New York: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
  22. Decker, J., Prostitution: Regulation and Control, (Littleton, CO: Rothman, 1979).Google Scholar
  23. Exner, J E., J. Wylie, A. Leura and T. Parrill, “Some Psychological Characteristics of Prostitutes,” Journal of Personality Assessment 1977, 41, 474–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farley, F. and S. Davis, “Masseuses, Men, and Massage Parlors,” Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 1978, 4, 219–225.Google Scholar
  25. Farley, M. and H. Barkan, “Prostitution, Violence, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder,” Women and Health 1998, 27, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Finstad, L. and C. Hoigard, “Norway,” in N. Davis (ed.), Prostitution: An International Handbook on Trends, Problems, and Policies, (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1993).Google Scholar
  27. Gallup Organization, Gallup Poll Monthly. No. 313. October 1991.Google Scholar
  28. —, Public Opinion Online, Lexis/Nexis. Gallup poll, May 28–29, 1996.Google Scholar
  29. Gray, K., “Prostitution Opponents Aim to Seize Johns' Cars,” Newsday, December 5, 1991, p. 25.Google Scholar
  30. Harris poll, Public Opinion Online, Lexis/Nexis. N = 1,513, November 30–December 10, 1978.Google Scholar
  31. Harris poll, Public Opinion Online, Lexis/Nexis. N = 2,254, January 11–February 11, 1990.Google Scholar
  32. Heyl, B., “Prostitution: An Extreme Case of Sex Stratification,” in F. Adler and R. Simon (eds.), The Criminology of Deviant Women, (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979).Google Scholar
  33. Hobson, B.M., Uneasy Virtue, (New York: Basic Books, 1987).Google Scholar
  34. James, J., “Prostitute-Pimp Relationships,” Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality 1973, 7, 147–160.Google Scholar
  35. Jennings, M.A., “The Victim as Criminal: A Consideration of California's Prostitution Law,” California Law Review 1976, 64, 1235–1284.Google Scholar
  36. Kelling, G. and C. Coles, Fixing Broken Windows, (New York: Free Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  37. Larsen, E.N., “The Politics of Prostitution Control: Interest Group Politics in Four Canadian Cities,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1992, 16, 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laumann, E., J. Gagnon, R. Michael and S. Michaels, The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  39. Little, C., Deviance and Control, (Itasca, IL: Peacock, 1995).Google Scholar
  40. Lowman, J., “Notions of Formal Equality Before the Law: The Experience of Street Prostitutes and their Customers,” Journal of Human Justice 1990, 1, 55–76.Google Scholar
  41. Lowman, J., “Street Prostitution Control,” British Journal of Criminology 1992, 32, 1–17.Google Scholar
  42. McCaghy, C. and S. Cernkovich, “Changing Public Opinion toward Prostitution Laws,” Paper presented at the World Congress of Sexology, Amsterdam, 1991.Google Scholar
  43. Matthews, R., Kerb-Crawling, Prostitution, and Multi-Agency Policing, Paper no. 43, (London: Home Office, 1993).Google Scholar
  44. Merit Audits and Surveys, Merit Report. October 15–20, 1983.Google Scholar
  45. Milman, B., “New Rules for the Oldest Profession: Should We Change our Prostitution Laws?” Harvard Women's Law Journal 1980, 3, 1–82.Google Scholar
  46. Newsweek poll, Public Opinion Online. Lexis/Nexis. N = 753, January 26–27, 1995.Google Scholar
  47. Pearl, J., “The Highest Paying Customer: America's Cities and the Costs of Prostitution Control,” Hastings Law Journal 1987, 38, 769–800.Google Scholar
  48. Peat Marwick and Partners, A National Population Study of Prostitution and Pornography, Report no. 6., (Ottawa: Department of Justice, 1984).Google Scholar
  49. Perkins, R., Working Girls, (Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 1991).Google Scholar
  50. Persons, C., “Sex in the Sunlight: The Effectiveness, Efficiency, Constitutionality, and Advisability of Publishing Names and Pictures of Prostitutes' Patrons,” Vanderbilt Law Review 1996, 49, 1525–1575.Google Scholar
  51. Pivar, D., Purity Crusade, (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1973).Google Scholar
  52. Posner, R. and K. Silbaugh, A Guide to America's Sex Laws, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  53. Reynolds, H., The Economics of Prostitution, (Springfield: Charles Thomas, 1986).Google Scholar
  54. San Diego Prostitution Task Force, Report, (San Diego City Council, October 1993).Google Scholar
  55. San Francisco Committee on Crime, A Report on Non-Victim Crime in San Francisco, Part 2: Sexual Conduct, Gambling, Pornography, (Mayor's Office, 1971).Google Scholar
  56. San Francisco Task Force on Prostitution, Final Report, (San Francisco Board of Supervisors, March 1996).Google Scholar
  57. Seattle Women's Commission, Project to Address the Legal, Political, and Service Barriers Facing Women in the Sex Industry, Report to the Major and City Council, (Seattle: July 1995).Google Scholar
  58. Silbert, M. and A. Pines, “Victimization of Street Prostitutes,” Victimology 1982, 7, 122–133.Google Scholar
  59. Skogan, W., Disorder and Decline, (New York: Free Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  60. Skolnick, J. and J. Dombrink, “The Legalization of Deviance,” Criminology 1978, 16, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Special Committee on Pornography and Prostitution, Pornography and Prostitution in Canada, (Ottawa: Dept. of Supply and Services, 1985).Google Scholar
  62. Sullivan, B., The Politics of Sex: Prostitution and Pornography in Australia since 1945, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  63. Weiner, A., “Understanding the Social Needs of Streetwalking Prostitutes,” Social Work 1996, 41, 97–105.Google Scholar
  64. Weitzer, R., “Prostitutes' Rights in the United States: The Failure of a Movement,” Sociological Quarterly 1991, 32, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weitzer, R., “The Politics of Prostitution in America,” in R. Weitzer (ed.), Sex for Sale: Prostitution, Pornography, and the Sex Industry, (New York: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
  66. Wilson, J.Q. and G. Kelling, “Broken Windows,” Atlantic Monthly March 1982, 29–38.Google Scholar
  67. Working Group [Federal/Provincial Territorial Working Group on Prostitution], Report and Recommendations in Respect of Legislation, Policy, and Practices Concerning Prostitution-Related Activities, (Ottawa: Department of Justice, 1998).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Weitzer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyGeorge Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA (e-mail

Personalised recommendations