1.

L. Morgenstern, “Inheritance comes of age: Applying nonmonotonic techniques to problems in industry,” in *Proc. of the Fiftheenth Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97)*, Nagoya, Japan, 1997, pp. 1613- 1613.

2.

L. Morgenstern and M. Singh, “An expert system using nonmonotonic techniques for benefits inquiry in the insurance industry,” in *Proc. of the Fifteenth Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97)*, Nagoya, Japan, 1997, pp. 655- 661.

3.

D. Dubois, J. Lang, and H. Prade, “Possibilistic logic,” in *Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming*, edited by D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger, J.A. Robinson, and D. Nute, Oxford University Press, vol. 3, pp. 439- 513, 1994.

4.

D. Dubois, J. Lang, and H. Prade, “Automated reasoning using possibilistic logic: Semantics, belief revision and variable certainty weights,”

*IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering*, vol. 6, no.1, pp. 64- 71, 1994.

Google Scholar5.

F.F. Monai and T. Chehire, “Possibilistic assumption based truth maintenance system, validation in a data fusion application,” in *Proc. of the 8th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence*, edited by D. Dubois et al., 1992, pp. 83- 91.

6.

S. Benferhat, T. Cherire, and F.F. Monai, “Possibilistic ATMS in a data fusion problem,” in *Fuzzy Information Engineering: A Guided Tour of Applications*, edited by D. Dubois, H. Prade, and R.R. Yager, John Wily & sons, 1997.

7.

S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Representing default rules in possibilistic logic,” in *Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR*'92), Cambridge, MA, October 1992, pp. 673- 684.

8.

D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Conditional objects, possibility theory and default rules,” in *Conditionals: From Philosophy to Computer Sciences*, edited by G. Crocco, L. Fariñas del Cerro, and A. Herzig, Oxford University Press, pp. 301- 336, 1995.

9.

S. Kraus, D. Lehmann, and M. Magidor, “Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics,”

*Artificial Intelligence*, vol. 44, pp. 167- 207, 1990.

Google Scholar10.

D. Lehmann and M. Magidor, “What does a conditional knowledge base entail?”

*Artficial Intelligence*, vol. 55, pp. 1- 60, 1992.

Google Scholar11.

S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Beyond counterexamples to nonmonotonic formalisms: A possibility-theoretic analysis,” in

*Proc. of the 12th Europ. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'96)*, edited by W. Wahlster, Budapest, Hungary, Wiley: New York, August 1996, pp. 652- 656.

Google Scholar12.

S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Coping with the limitations of rational inference in the framework of possibility theory,” in

*Proc. of the 12th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence*, edited by E. Horvitz and F. Jensen, Portland, Oregon, Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, August 1996, pp. 90- 97.

Google Scholar13.

L.A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,”

*Fuzzy Sets and Systems*, vol. 1, pp. 3- 28, 1978.

Google Scholar14.

D. Dubois and H. Prade, (with the collaboration of H. Farreny, R. Martin-Clouaire, C. Testemale),

*Possibility Theory—An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty*, Plenum Press: New York, 1988.

Google Scholar15.

P. Gärdenfors,

*Knowledge in Flux—Modeling the Dynamic of Epistemic States*, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1988.

Google Scholar16.

G.L.S. Shackle,

*Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs*, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1961.

Google Scholar17.

L.J. Cohen,

*The Probable and the Provable*, Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1977.

Google Scholar18.

N. Rescher,

*Plausible Reasoning: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Plausibilistic Inference*, Van Gorcum, Amsterdam, 1976.

Google Scholar19.

W. Spohn, “Ordinal conditional functions: A dynamic theory of epistemic states,” in

*Causation in Decision, Belief Change, and Statistics*, edited by W.L. Harper and B. Skyrms, Kluwer Academic Publ.: Dordrecht, pp. 105- 134, 1988.

Google Scholar20.

D. Dubois, “Belief structures, possibility theory, decomposable confidence measures on finite sets,”

*Computer and Artificial Intelligence*, vol. 5, no.5, pp. 403- 417, 1986.

Google Scholar21.

D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Epistemic entrenchment and possibilistic logic,”

*Artificial Intelligence*, vol. 50, pp. 223- 239, 1991.

Google Scholar22.

R.R. Yager, “On the specificity of a possibility distribution,”

*Fuzzy Sets and Systems*, vol. 50, pp. 279- 292, 1992.

Google Scholar23.

Y. Shoham, “*Reasoning about Change—Time and Causation from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence*,” MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1988.

24.

D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Possibilistic logic, preferential models, non-monotonicity and related issues,” in *Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI*'91), Sydney, August 1991, pp. 419- 424.

25.

S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Nonmonotonic reasoning, conditional objects and possibility theory,”

*Artificial Intelligence*, vol. 92, pp. 259- 276, 1997.

Google Scholar26.

E. Hisdal, “Conditional possibilities independence and noninteraction,”

*Fuzzy Sets and Systems*, vol. 1, pp. 283- 297, 1978.

Google Scholar27.

D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Necessity measures and the resolution principle,”

*IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics*, vol. 17, pp. 474- 478, 1987.

Google Scholar28.

D. Dubois, J. Lang, and H. Prade, “Theorem proving under uncertainty—A possibility theory-based approah,” in *Proc. of the Tenth Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-87)*, 1987, pp. 984- 986.

29.

J. Lang, “Logique possibiliste: Aspects formels, d´eduction automatique, et applications,” Ph.D. Thesis, Universite P. Sabatier, Toulouse, France, January 1991.

Google Scholar30.

E. Sandewall, “The range of applicability of nonmonotonic logics for the inerrtia problem,” in *Proc. of Int. Joint Conf. on Arti-ficial Intelligence (IJCAI-93)*, 1993, pp. 738- 743.

31.

M.O. Cordier and P. Siegel, “Prioritized transitions for updates,” in *Proc. of the AI*'93 Workshop on Belief Revision, Melbourn, 1993.

32.

D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Combining hypothetical reasoning and plausible inference in possibilistic logic,”

*Multiple Valued Logic*, vol. 1, pp. 219- 239, 1996.

Google Scholar33.

S. Benferhat, “Handling hard rules and default rules in possibilistic logic,” in

*Advances in Intelligent Computing*—IPMU'94 (Selected Papers of the Inter. Conf. on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU'94), Paris, France, July 1994) edited by B. Bouchon-Meunier, R.R. Yager, and L.A. Zadeh, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag: Berlin, vol. 945, 1995, pp. 302- 310.

Google Scholar34.

D.M. Gabbay, “Theoretical foundations for non-monotonic reasoning in expert systems,” in *Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems*, edited by K.R. Apt, Springer-Verlag, pp. 439- 457, 1985.

35.

D. Makinson, “General theory of cumulative inference,” in

*Non-Monotonic Reasoning*, edited by M. Reinfrank, J. De Kleer, M.L. Ginsberg, and E. Sandewall, LNAI, Springer Verlag: Berlin, vol. 346, pp. 1- 18, 1989.

Google Scholar36.

P. Gärdenfors and D. Makinson, “Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations,”

*Artificial Intelligence*, vol. 65, pp. 197- 245, 1994.

Google Scholar37.

E.W. Adams, *The Logic of Conditionals*, Reidel: Dordrecht, 1975.

38.

J. Pearl, “System Z: A natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to default reasoning,” in *Proc. of the 3rd Conf. on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge (TARK*'90), San Mateo, CA, 1990, pp. 121- 135.

39.

M. Goldszmidt and J. Pearl, “On the relation between rational closure and System Z,” in *Proc. of the 3rd Int. Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning*, South Lake Tahoe, 1990, pp. 130- 140.

40.

D. Dubois, L. Fariñas del Cerro, A. Herzig, and H. Prade, “Qualitative relevance and independence: A roadmap,” in *Proc. of the Fiftheenth Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97)*, Nagoya, Japan, 1997, pp. 62- 67.

41.

S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, “Expressing independence in a possibilistic framework and its application to default reasoning,” in *Proc. of the 11th Europ. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI*'94), Amsterdam, August 1994, pp. 150- 154.

42.

D. Dubois, L. Fariñas del Cerro, A. Herzig, and H. Prade, “An ordinal view of independence with application to plausible reasoning,” in *Proc. of the 10th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence*, edited by R. Lopez de Mantaras and D. Poole, Seattle, WA, July 1994, pp. 195- 203.

43.

D. Dubois, J. Lang, and H. Prade, “A possibilistic assumptions-based truth maintenance systems with uncertain justifications and its application to belief revision,” in

*Truth Maintenance Systems—Proc. ECAI-90 Workshop*, Stockholm, Sweeden, August 1990, edited by J.P. Martins and M. Reinfrank, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 55, pp. 87- 106.

Google Scholar44.

S. Nahmias, “Fuzzy variables,” *Fuzzy Sets and Systems*, pp. 97- 110, 1978.