Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 187–207 | Cite as

Environmental Policy, Tax Incidence, and the Cost of Public Funds

  • Jenny E. Ligthart
  • Frederick Van Der Ploeg
Article

Abstract

This paper studies under what conditions a ‘double dividend’ may occur in the sense that both environmental quality and employment rise. A simple static general equilibrium model is employed in which tax policy faces the dual task of internalising a negative environmental externality and raising revenue to finance public consumption. The model features a clearing labour market with both labour demand and supply and a fixed factor of production (e.g. capital). Hence, we can study tax incidence and its effect on employment, environmental quality, and the marginal cost of public funds. It is shown for the case of an upward sloping labour supply curve and less than full tax shifting by employers that a shift towards greener preferences cannot yield a double dividend, even if the fixed factor is important. However, if labour supply curve bends backwards, more environmental concern confers a double dividend.

cost of public funds double dividend environmental externalities pollution public abatement optimal taxation public goods tax incidence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, A. B. and J. E. Stiglitz (1980), Lectures on Public Economics, McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  2. Auerbach, A. J. (1985), ‘The Theory of Excess Burden and Optimal Taxation’, in A. J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, eds., Handbook of Public Economics, vol I, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 61–127.Google Scholar
  3. Ballard, C. L. and D. Fullerton (1992), ‘Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 117–131.Google Scholar
  4. Bovenberg, A. L. (1997), ‘Environmental Policy, Distortionary Labour Taxation, and Employment: Pollution Taxes and the Double Dividend’, in C. Carraro, ed., New Directions in the Economic Theory of the Environment, Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  5. Bovenberg, A. L. and F. van der Ploeg (1994a), ‘Green Policies and Public Finance in an Open Economy’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 96, 343–363.Google Scholar
  6. Bovenberg, A. L. and F. van der Ploeg (1994b), ‘Environmental Policy, Public Finance, and the Labour Market in a Second-Best World’, Journal of Public Economics 55, 349–390.Google Scholar
  7. Bovenberg, A. L. and F. van der Ploeg (1996), ‘Optimal Taxation, Public Goods, and Environmental Policy with Involuntary Unemployment’, Journal of Public Economics 62, 59–83.Google Scholar
  8. Goulder, L. H. (1995), ‘Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend: A Reader's Guide’, International Tax and Public Finance 2, 157–183.Google Scholar
  9. Hausman, J. A. (1985), ‘Taxes and Labour Supply’, in A. J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein (eds), Handbook of Public Economics, Volume I, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  10. Lee, D. R. and W. S. Misiolek (1986), ‘Substituting Pollution Taxation for General Taxation: Some Implications for Efficiency in Pollution Taxation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13, 338–347.Google Scholar
  11. Ligthart, J. E. (1997), Environment, Imperfect Markets, and Public Finance, Tinbergen Institute Research Series, no. 170, Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Oates, W. E. (1995), ‘Green Taxes: Can we Protect the Environment and Improve the Tax System at the Same Time?’, Southern Economic Journal 61, 915–922.Google Scholar
  13. Pearce, D. (1991), ‘The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming’, Economic Journal 101, 938–948.Google Scholar
  14. Ramsey, F. (1927), ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation’, Economic Journal 37, 47–61.Google Scholar
  15. Samuelson, P. A. (1954), ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure’, Review of Economics and Statistics 36, 387–389.Google Scholar
  16. Sandmo, A. (1975), ‘Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities’, Swedish Journal of Economics 77, 86–98.Google Scholar
  17. Terkla, D. (1984), ‘The Efficiency Value of Effluent Tax Revenues’, Journal of Environmental Economics Management 11, 107–123.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jenny E. Ligthart
    • 1
  • Frederick Van Der Ploeg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations