Minds and Machines

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 227–247

Software Agents and Their Bodies

  • Nicholas Kushmerick


Within artificial intelligence and the philosophy of mind,there is considerable disagreement over the relationship between anagent's body and its capacity for intelligent behavior. Some treatthe body as peripheral and tangential to intelligence; others arguethat embodiment and intelligence are inextricably linked. Softwareagents–-computer programs that interact with software environmentssuch as the Internet–-provide an ideal context in which to studythis tension. I develop a computational framework for analyzingembodiment. The framework generalizes the notion of a body beyondmerely having a physical presence. My analysis sheds light oncertain claims made about the relevance of the body to intelligence,as well as on embodiment in software worlds.

Embodiment body software agents artificial intelligence computational transformation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. P. Agre and Chapman (1990) ‘What are plans for?’ Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6(1–2):17–34.Google Scholar
  2. P. Agre and I. Horswill (1992), Cultural Support for Improvisation', in Proc. 10th Nat. Conf. on AI, pp. 363–368.Google Scholar
  3. Y. Aloimonos, ed. (1993) Active Perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Brooks and L. Stein. ‘Building Brains for Bodies. ’ Autonomous Robots, 1(1):7–25, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. R. Brooks. ‘Elephants Don’t Play Chess. ‘Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6(1–2):3–15, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. R. Brooks (1991a), ‘Intelligence without Reason’, In Proc. 12th Int. Joint Conf. on AI, pp. 569–595.Google Scholar
  7. R. Brooks (1991), ‘Intelligence without Representation’, Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3):139–159.Google Scholar
  8. H. Collins (1996), ‘Embedded or Embodied? a Review of Hubert Dreyfus' What Computers Still Can’t Do , Artificial Intelligence, 80(1):99–117.Google Scholar
  9. B. Donald. On information invariants in robotics. Artificial Intelligence, 72(1–2):217–304. 1995.Google Scholar
  10. H. Dreyfus. What Computers Can't Do, 1979. New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  11. H. Dreyfus. Being-in-the-World. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. H. Dreyfus and S. Dreyfus. Making a mind vs.modelling a brain: artificial intelligence back at a branchpoint. Dædalus, 117(1):15–43, 1988.Google Scholar
  13. O. Etzioni. Intelligence without robots: A reply to Brooks. AI Magazine, 14(4):7–13, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. O. Etzioni. Etzioni Replies. AI Magazine, 15(2):13–14, 1994. Response to commentary on Etzioni 1993).Google Scholar
  15. O. Etzioni. Moving up the information food chain: softbots as information carnivores. In Proc. 14th Nat. Conf. on AI, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. O. Etzioni and D. Weld. A softbot-based interface to the Internet. CACM, 37(7):72–76Google Scholar
  17. O. Etzioni, P. Maes, T. Mitchell, and Y. Shoham, eds. Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Software Agents, Menlo Park, CA, 1994. AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  18. O. Etzioni, H. Levy, R. Segal, and C. Thekkath. The softbot approach to OS interfaces. IEEE Software, 12(4):42–51, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. K. Hammond, T. Converse, and J. Grass. The stabilization of environments. Artificial Intelligence, 72(1–2):305–327, 1995.Google Scholar
  20. S. Harnad. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42(1–3):335–346, 1990.Google Scholar
  21. J. Haugeland. Body and world: a review of What Computers Still Can't Do. Artificial Intelligence, 80(1):119–128, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. J. Haugeland. Mind embodied and Embedded. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 58:233–267, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. I. Horswill (1995), Analysis of Adaptation and Environment. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2):1–30.Google Scholar
  24. E. Hutchins. How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science, 19(3):265–288, 1995.Google Scholar
  25. M. Johnson. The Body in the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987.Google Scholar
  26. K. Kanazawa. Sensible Decisions: Toward a Theory of Decision-Theoretic Information Invariants. In Proc. 12th Nat. Conf. on AI, pp. 973–978, 1994.Google Scholar
  27. D. Kirsh. Today the earwig, tomorrow man? Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3):161–184, 1991.Google Scholar
  28. D. Kirsh. The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2):31–68, 1995.Google Scholar
  29. N. Kushmerick. Exploiting the environment: Urban navigation as a case study. In Proc. 12th Nat. Conf. on AI, p. 1469, 1994.Google Scholar
  30. G. Lakoff. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987.Google Scholar
  31. G. Lakoff and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.Google Scholar
  32. M. Mason. Compliant motion. In M. Brady, J. Hollerbach, T. Johnson, T. Lozano-Perez, and M. Mason, eds., Robot Motion: Planning and Control. MIT Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  33. H. Putnam. Reductionism and the Nature of Psychology. In J. Haugeland, ed., Mind Design. MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  34. D. Riecken, Special Issue on Intelligent Agents. Comm. of the ACM, 37(7), 1994.Google Scholar
  35. Y. Shoham and M. Tennenholtz. On social laws for artificial agent societies: Off-line design. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2):231–252, 1995.Google Scholar
  36. S. Ullman. Visual routines. Cognition, 18(1–3):97–159, 1984.Google Scholar
  37. M. Wooldridge and N. Jennings, eds. Intelligent Agents. Springer Verlag, New York, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Kushmerick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations