Advertisement

Journal of Logic, Language and Information

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 167–185 | Cite as

A Logic with Relative Knowledge Operators

  • Stéphane Demri
Article

Abstract

We study a knowledge logic that assumes that to each set of agents, an indiscernibility relation is associated and the agents decide the membership of objects or states up to this indiscernibility relation. Its language contains a family of relative knowledge operators. We prove the decidability of the satisfiability problem, we show its EXPTIME-completeness and as a side-effect, we define a complete Hilbert-style axiomatization.

Modal logic relative knowledge operator decidability complexity Hilbert-style 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aumann, R., 1976, “Agreeing to disagree,” Annals of Statistics 4(3), 1236–1239.Google Scholar
  2. Balbiani, P., 1997, “Axiomatization of logics based on Kripke models with relative accessibility relations,” pp. 553–578 in Incomplete Information: Rough Set Analysis, E. Orłowska, ed., Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Cresswell, M., 1988, “Necessity and contingency,” Studia Logica 47(2), 145–149.Google Scholar
  4. Demri, S., 1997, “A completeness proof for a logic with an alternative necessity operator,” Studia Logica 58(1), 99–112.Google Scholar
  5. Demri, S. and Gabbay, D., 1998, “Onmodal logics characterized by models with relative accessibility relations,” submitted.Google Scholar
  6. Fagin, R., Halpern, J., Moses, Y., and Vardi, M., 1995, Reasoning about Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gargov, G. and Passy, S., 1990, “A note on boolean modal logic,” pp. 299–309 in Summer School and Conference on Mathematical Logic’ 88, P. Petkov, ed., New York: PlenumPress.Google Scholar
  8. Goranko, V. and Passy, S., 1992, “Using the universal modality: gains and questions,” Journal of Logic and Computation 2(1), 5–30.Google Scholar
  9. Halpern, J. and Moses, Y., 1992, “A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief,” Artificial Intelligence 54, 319–379.Google Scholar
  10. Hemaspaandra, E., 1996, “The price of universality,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37(2), 173–203.Google Scholar
  11. Hintikka, J., 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Humberstone, L., 1995, “The logic of non-contingency,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36(2), 214–229.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, D., 1990, “A catalog of complexity classes,” pp. 68–161 in Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume A, Algorithms and Complexity, J. van Leeuwen, ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. Konikowska, B., 1997, “A logic for reasoning about relative similarity,” Studia Logica 58(1), 185–226.Google Scholar
  15. Kuhn, S., 1995, “Minimal logic of non-contingency,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36(2), 230–234.Google Scholar
  16. Lemmon, E., 1965, Beginning Logic, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Makinson, D., 1966, “On some completeness theorems in modal logic,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 379–384.Google Scholar
  18. Montgomery, H. and Routley, R., 1966, “Contingency and non-contingency bases for normal modal logics,” Logique et Analyse 9, 318–328.Google Scholar
  19. Montgomery, H. and Routley, R., 1968, “Non-contingency axioms for S4 and S5,” Logique et Analyse 11, 422–424.Google Scholar
  20. Orłowska, E., 1989, “Logic for reasoning about knowledge,” Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 35, 559–572.Google Scholar
  21. Pawlak, Z., 1981, “Information systems theoretical foundations,” Information Systems 6(3), 205–218.Google Scholar
  22. Pratt, V., 1979, “Models of program logics,” pp. 115–122 in Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.Google Scholar
  23. Vakarelov, D., 1991, “Modal logics for knowledge representation systems,” Theoretical Computer Science 90, 433–456.Google Scholar
  24. Valiev, M., 1988, “Interpretation of modal logics as epistemic logics,” pp. 76–77 in Proceedings of the Conference of Borzomi [in Russian].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stéphane Demri
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire Leibniz – C.N.R.S.GrenobleFrance (E-mail

Personalised recommendations