Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 87–120 | Cite as

The Ambiguity of the -te iru form in Japanese

  • Toshiyuki Ogihara


This article presents a formal semantic account of the ambiguity associated with the -te iru construction in Japanese. This construction is known to receive at least two distinct interpretations: on-going process interpretations analogous to the English progressive and so-called resultative interpretations. The latter are sub-classified by some researchers into concrete result state readings and experiential state readings. Based upon the distributional properties of adverbials, we suggest that progressive interpretations of DURATIVE VERBS and concrete result state interpretations of INTANTANEOUS VERBS should be grouped together, as opposed to experiential readings of DURATIVE or INTANTANEOUS VERBS. To account for the distinction between these two types of interpretation, the proposed system analyzes the -te iru form into the morpheme -te, which is claimed to bear a perfect feature, and the aspectual auxiliary iru. Our proposal for the aspectual auxiliary iru is an extension of Landman's (1992) proposal and offers a unified account of the multiple interpretations of -te iru on the basis of a new analysis of INTANTANEOUS VERBS.


Experiential State Result State Distributional Property Experiential Reading State Interpretation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arikawa, Koji (1992) Binding Domain and Modality: A Case Study of Tense Binding in Japanese, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, Emmon (1986) “The Algebra of Events,” Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, Michael and Barbara Partee (1972) “Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English,” distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  4. Bresnan, Joan (1982) “The Passive in Lexical Theory,” in Joan Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–86.Google Scholar
  5. Carlson, Gregory (1977) Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amsherst.Google Scholar
  6. Dowty, David (1979) World Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs in Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Fillmore, Charles J. (1981) “Pragmatics and the Description of Discouse,” in Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 143–166.Google Scholar
  8. Fujii, Tadashi (1966) “Dooshi+te iru no Imi” [The meaning of V-te iru], Kokugo Kenkyuushitsu 5, Tokyo University, Tokyo (reprinted in Kindaichi (1976)).Google Scholar
  9. Jacobsen, Wesley M. (1992) The Transitive Structure of Events in Japanese, Kuroshio Shuppan, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  10. Kindaichi, Haruhiko (1950) “Kokugo Dooshi no Ichibunrui,” Gengo Kenkyuu 15, 48–63 (reprinted in Kindaichi (1976)).Google Scholar
  11. Kindaichi, Haruhiko (ed.) (1976) Nihongo Dooshino Aspekuto [Aspectual Properties of Japanese Verbs], Mugi Shoboo, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  12. Krifka, Manfred (1992) “Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution,” in I. A. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters, Center for the Study of Language and Information, distributed by Chicago University Press, pp. 29–53.Google Scholar
  13. Kuno, Susumu (1973) The Structure of the Japanese Language, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Landman, Fred (1992) “The Progressive,” Natural Language Semantics 1, 1–32.Google Scholar
  15. Link, Godehard (1983) “The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-theoretical Approach,” in R. Bäauerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–323.Google Scholar
  16. McCawley, James D. (1978) “Notes on Japanese Clothing Verbs,” in J. Hinds and I. Howard (eds.), Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics, Kaitakusha, Tokyo, pp. 68–78.Google Scholar
  17. Milsark, Gary L. (1974) Existential Sentences in English, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  18. Nakau, Minoru (1976) “Tense, Aspects, and Modality,” in M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 5: Japanese Generative Grammar, Academic Press, New York, pp. 421–482.Google Scholar
  19. Ota, Akira (1971) “Comparison of English and Japanese with Special Reference to Tense and Aspect,” Hawaii 3, 121–164.Google Scholar
  20. Perlmutter, David (1978) “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis,” in J. Jaeger et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley, pp. 157–189.Google Scholar
  21. Vendler, Zeno (1957) “Verbs and Times,” The Philosophical Review 66, 143–160.Google Scholar
  22. Vlach, Frank (1981) “The Semantics of the Progressive,” in P. J. Tedeschi and A. Zaenan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics Vol. 14: Tense and Aspect, Academic Press, New York, pp. 271–292.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshiyuki Ogihara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of WashingtonSeattle

Personalised recommendations