Marketing Letters

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 5–20 | Cite as

Creating Brand Names With Meaning: The Use of Sound Symbolism

  • Richard R. Klink


The staggering level and rate of growth of brands being introduced to the marketplace suggests a heightened need to understand how to create effective new brand names. Limited academic research, however, has been conducted in this area. This paper investigates the use of linguistics, specifically sound symbolism, in order to create brand names with inherent meaning. Results of two studies indicate that the sound of a brand name can communicate information about the product, e.g. its size, speed, strength, weight, etc. Brand name sounds can convey product-related information either in the presence or absence of supporting marketing communications.

Brand names linguistics sound symbolism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aaker, David A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amanuma, Y. (1974). Dictionary of Onomatopes and Expressives (in Japanese). Tokyo: Tokyodo.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, Roger, (1958). Words and Things. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chastaing, M. (1958). “Le symbolisme des voyelles: significations des 'I'”, I & II, Journal de Psychologie 55, 403–423 & 461-481.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, John and Colin Yallop. (1990). An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Enis, Ben M. and James E. Stafford. (1969). “Consumers' Perceptions of Product Quality as a function of Various Informational Inputs,” in Marketing Involvement in Society and the Economy, P. McDonald, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  7. Erlich, Julie, (1995). “Giving Drugs a Good Name,” The New York Times Magazine, September 3, 36–37.Google Scholar
  8. Fónagy, I. (1963). Die Metaphern in der Phonetik. The Hague.Google Scholar
  9. Gabelentz, G. v. D. (1891). Die Sprachwissensschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  10. Gombrich, E. H. (1961). Art and Illusion. New York.Google Scholar
  11. Grammont, M. (1901). “Onomatopées et mots expressifs,” Trentenaire de la Société pour l'étude des Langues Romanes, Montpellier, 261–322.Google Scholar
  12. Grammont, M. (1913). Le vers francais: ses moyens d'expression, son harmonie. Paris.Google Scholar
  13. Haas, M. R. (1969). “Internal Reconstruction of the Nootka-Nitinat Pronominal Suffixes,” International Journal of American Linguistics, 35, 108–124.Google Scholar
  14. Hamano, Shoko. (1986). “The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese.” PhD dissertation, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  15. Hartley, Robert F. (1992). Marketing Mistakes, 5th Edition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Hilmer, H. (1914). Schallnachahmung, Wortschoepfung und Bedeutungswandel. Helle.Google Scholar
  17. Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Hohanna, and Ohala, John. (1994). “Introduction: Sound Symbolic Processes”. In Hinton, Nichols, and Ohala (eds.), Sound Symbolism, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jakobson, Roman and L. R. Waugh. (1979). The Sound Shape of Language, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jesperson, O. (1918). “Nogle men-ord,” Studier tillegnade Esaias Tegner, Lund, 49–55.Google Scholar
  20. Jesperson, O. (1933). “Symbolic Value of the Vowel i,” in Linguistica. Selected Papers in English, French and German. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard, 283–303.Google Scholar
  21. Karlgren, B. (1962). Sound Symbolism in Chinese, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  22. Keller, Kevin Lane, Susan E. Heckler, & Michael J. Houston. (1998). “The Effects of Brand Name Suggestiveness on Advertising Recall,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (January), 48–57.Google Scholar
  23. Kim, Kong-on. (1977). “Sound Symbolism in Korean,” Journal of Linguistics, 13, 67–75.Google Scholar
  24. Kotler, Philip H. (1991). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 7th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Ladefoged, Peter. (1975). A Course in Phonetics, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Lapolla, Randy J. (1994). “An experimental investigation into phonetic symbolism as it relates to Mandarin Chinese,” in Hinton, Nichols, and Ohala (eds.), Sound Symbolism, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. MacKay, Ian R. A. (1978). Introducing Practical Phonetics, Boston: Little, Brown and Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, S. (1962). “Phonetic Symbolism in English Word-Formation,” Indogermanische Forschungen, 64, 146–168 & 256-277.Google Scholar
  29. Morton, Eugene S. (1977). “On the Occurrence and Significance of Motivation-Structural Rules in some Bird and Mammal Sounds,” American Naturalist, 111, 855–869.Google Scholar
  30. Morton, Eugene S. (1994). “Sound Symbolism and Its Role in Non-Human Vertebrate Communication”. In Hinton, Nichols, and Ohala (eds.), Sound Symbolism, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Newman, Stanley S. (1933). “Further Experiments in Phonetic Symbolism,” American Journal of Psychology, 45, 53–75.Google Scholar
  32. Nichols, J. (1971). “Diminutive consonant symbolism in Western North America.” Language 47: 826–848.Google Scholar
  33. Ohala, John. (1984). “An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-Language Utilization of FO of Voice,” Phonetica, 41, 1–16.Google Scholar
  34. Ohala, John. (1994). “The Frequency Code Underlies the Sound-Symbolic Use of Voice Pitch,” in Sound Symbolism, eds. Hinton, Nichols, and Ohala, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Peterfalvi, J. M. (1970). “Recherches expérimentales sur le symbolisme phonétique,” American Journal of Psychology, 65, 439–473.Google Scholar
  36. Peterson, Robert A. (1970). “The Price-Perceived Quality Relationship: Experimental Evidence,” Journal of Marketing Research 7 (November), 525–28.Google Scholar
  37. Peterson, Robert A, and Ivan Ross. (1972). “How to Name New Brands,” Journal of Advertising Research, 12 (6), 29–34.Google Scholar
  38. Samarin, W. J. (1967). “Determining the Meanings of Ideophones,” Journal of West African Languages, 4, 35–41.Google Scholar
  39. Sapir, Edward, (1929). “A Study in Phonetic Symbolism,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12 (June), 225–239.Google Scholar
  40. Schloss Ira. (1981). “Chickens and Pickles,” Journal of Advertising Research, 21 (December), 47–49.Google Scholar
  41. Schuchardt, H. (1897). “Keltorom. frog-, frogn-Lautsymbolik,” Zeitschrift fuer romanische Philologie, 21, 199–205.Google Scholar
  42. Ultan, R. (1978). “Size-Sound Symbolism,” In Joseph Greenberg, (ed) Universals of Human Language, Volume 2: Phonology. Stanford: University Press.Google Scholar
  43. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 1997 Annual Report.Google Scholar
  44. Vanden Bergh, Bruce G., Janay Collins, Myrna Schultz and Keith Adler. (1984). “Sound Advice on Brand Names,” Journalism Quarterly, 61, 4, 835–840.Google Scholar
  45. Vanden Bergh, Bruce G., Keith Adler and Lauren Oliver. (1987). “Linguistic Distinction Among Top Brand Names,” Journal of Advertising Research, August/September, 39–44.Google Scholar
  46. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought and Reality, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Yovovich, B. G. (1988). “What is Your Brand Really Worth?” Adweek's Marketing Week (August 8), 18–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard R. Klink
    • 1
  1. 1.The Joseph A. Sellinger, S.J. School of Business and ManagementLoyola College in MarylandBaltimore

Personalised recommendations