Landscape Ecology

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 467–478 | Cite as

Lacunarity analysis of spatial pattern: A comparison

  • M.R.T. Dale

Abstract

Lacunarity analysis has been proposed as a general method for the analysis of spatial pattern, in particular for patterns of the dispersion of points. The method is clearly an improvement over the variance:mean ratio approach based on quadrat counts, because it examines dispersion at a range of spatial scales. This paper examines the properties of lacunarity analysis and compares it with other methods of pattern analysis. Lacunarity analysis gives different results for complementary patterns, which may be an advantage depending on circumstances. The method, however, is not precise in determining the scale or the patch size in pattern with known properties. A modification that improves the interpretability of the results of the analysis is introduced but a weakness of this approach is that it does provide clear indications of the characteristics of cases that exhibit more than one scale of pattern. Because different methods react to different features in data, it is recommended that data be analysed by more than one method and the results compared for greater insight into their characteristics.

scale patch pattern analysis transect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allain, C. and Cloitre, M. 1991. Characterizing the lacunarity of random and deterministic fractal sets. Phys. Rev. A44: 552–3558.Google Scholar
  2. Bradshaw, G.A. and Spies, T.A. 1992. Characterizing canopy gap structure in forests using wavelet analysis. J. Ecol. 80: 205–215.Google Scholar
  3. Carlile, D.W., Skalski, J.R., Batker, J.E., Thomas, J.M. and Cullinan, V.I. 1989. Determination of ecological scale. Landscape Ecol. 2: 203–213.Google Scholar
  4. Dale, M.R.T. 1999. Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Dale, M.R.T. and MacIsaac, D.A. 1989. New methods for the analysis of spatial pattern in vegetation. J. Ecol. 77: 78–91.Google Scholar
  6. Dale, M.R.T. and Blundon, D.J. 1990. Quadrat variance analysis and pattern development during primary succession. J. Veg. Sci 1: 153–64.Google Scholar
  7. Dale, M.R.T. and Mah, M. 1998. The use of wavelets for spatial pattern analysis in ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 9: 805–814.Google Scholar
  8. Diggle, P.J. 1983. Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  9. Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology. 3rd edition University of California Press, Berkely.Google Scholar
  10. Hill, M.O. 1973. The intensity of spatial pattern in plant communities. J. Ecol. 61: 225–235.Google Scholar
  11. Hurlbert, S.H. 1990. Spatial distribution of the montane unicorn. Oikos 58: 257–271.Google Scholar
  12. Kenkel, N.C. and Walker D.J. 1993. Fractals and ecology. Abstracta Bot. 17: 53–70.Google Scholar
  13. Leps, J. (1990). Comparison of transect methods for the analysis of spatial pattern. In Spatial processes in plant communities. pp 71–82. Edited by F. Krahulec, A.D.Q. Agnew, S. Agnew and Willem. Academia Press, Prague.Google Scholar
  14. Mandelbrot, B.B. 1982. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, San Fransisco.Google Scholar
  15. Manly, B.F.J. 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  16. Pielou, E.C. 1977. Mathematical Ecology. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Plotnick, R.E., Gardner, R.H. and O'Neill, R.V. 1993. Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. Landscape Ecol. 8: 201–211.Google Scholar
  18. Plotnick, R.E., Gardner, R.H., Hargrove, W.W., Pretegaard, K. and Perlmutter, M. 1996. Lacunarity analysis: A general technique for the analysis of spatial patterns. Phys. Rev. E53: 5461–5468.Google Scholar
  19. Ripley, B.D. 1978. Spectral analysis and the analysis of pattern in plant communities. J. Ecol. 66: 965–981.Google Scholar
  20. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry. Freeman, San Fransisco.Google Scholar
  21. Turner, S.J., O'Neill, R.V., Conley, W., Conley, M.R. and Humphries, H.C. 1991. Pattern and scale: Statistics for landscape ecology. In Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. pp. 17–49. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Upton, G.J.G. and Fingleton, B. 1985. Spatial data analysis by example, Vol. I. Point Pattern and Quantitative Data. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Ver Hoef, J.M., Cressie, N.A.C. and Glenn-Lewin, D.C. 1993. Spatial models for spatial statistics: Some unification. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 441–452.Google Scholar
  24. Wu, Y., Sklar, F.H. and Rutchey, K. 1997. Analysis and simulations of fragmentation patterns in the everglades. Ecol. Appl. 7: 268–276.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.R.T. Dale
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations