Small Business Economics

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 165–182 | Cite as

What Makes a New Business Start-Up Successful?

  • Gavin C. Reid
  • Julia A. Smith
Article

Abstract

This paper seeks a good measure of new business performance, and then explains this measure by various dimensions of business strategy. Three criteria are used to create a one dimensional ordinal ranking of high, medium and low performance for new business starts: employment growth; return on capital employed; and labour productivity. It is shown that statistical cluster analysis provides a convincing separation of a sample of new business starts into high, medium and low performance categories, using a minimum distance criterion for clustering. An ordinal logit model (with selection) is then used to explain this performance ranking. The results indicate that many widely discussed features of small business strategy have little, or even negative, impact on performance. Of the numerous aims that owner managers may adopt (survival, growth etc.), only one appears to have a major impact on performance; the pursuit of the highest rate of return on investment. Many entrepreneurial perceptions of their own capabilities appear false or unimportant, with the exception of organisational features and systems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ansoff, H. I., 1965, Corporate Strategy: An Analytical Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, W. E. and P. E. Kennedy, 1992, ‘A Graphical Exposition of the Ordered Probit’, Econometric Theory 8, 127–131.Google Scholar
  3. Beggs, S. S. Cardell and J. Hausman, 1981, ‘Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars’, Journal of Econometrics 17, 19–20.Google Scholar
  4. Binks, M. and J. Coynes, 1983, The Birth of Enterprise: An Analytical and Empirical Study of the Growth of Small Firms, London: IEA.Google Scholar
  5. Birch, D., 1996, Paper presented to the Jönköping International Business School Conference on ‘Entrepreneurship, SMEs and the Macro Economy’, 13–14 June 1996 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  6. Blanchflower, and A. Oswald, 1990, ‘What Makes an Entrepreneur?’ NBER Working Paper No. 3252.Google Scholar
  7. Daly, M. A. and A. McCann, 1992, ‘How Many Small Firms?’, Employment Gazette 100(2), 47–51.Google Scholar
  8. Everitt, B. S., 1980, Cluster Analysis (2nd Edn), London: Heineman.Google Scholar
  9. Frank, M. Z., 1988, ‘An Intemporal Model of Industrial Exit’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 103, 333–344.Google Scholar
  10. Greene, W. H., 1992, Limdep User's Manual and Reference Guide, Bellport, NY: Econometric Software Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Greene, W. H., 1993, Econometric Analysis (2nd edn), New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Hay, D. A. and D. J. Morris, 1991, Industrial Economics and Organization (2nd edn.), Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, G. and K. Scholes, 1993, Exploring Corporate Strategy, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Jovanovic, B., 1982, ‘Selection and the Evolution of Industry’, Econometrica 50, 649–670.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, L.-F., 1982, ‘Some Approaches to the Correction of Selectivity Bias’, Review of Economic Studies 49, 355–720.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, L.-F., 1983, ‘Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity’, Econometrica 51(2), 507–512.Google Scholar
  17. Manly, B. F. J., 1986, Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Mintzberg, H., 1987, ‘Crafting Strategy’, Harvard Business Review 60, 66–75.Google Scholar
  19. Mintzberg, H., 1994, ‘The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning’, Harvard Business Review 72, 107–114.Google Scholar
  20. Norusis, M. J., 1994, SPSS Professional Statistics 6.1, Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Reid, G. C., 1987, Theories of Industrial Organization, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Reid, G. C., 1991, ‘Staying in Business’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 9, 545–556.Google Scholar
  23. Reid, G. C., 1993, Small Business Enterprise, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Reid, G. C., 1999a, ‘Capital Structure at Inception and the Short-run Performance of Micro-firms’, Chapter 7 in Z. J. Acs, B. B. Carlsson and C. Karlsson (eds), Entrepreneurship, Small & Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–205.Google Scholar
  25. Reid, G. C., 1999b, ‘Making Small Firms Work: Policy Dimensions and the Scottish Context’, Chapter 10 in K. Cowling (ed.), Industrial Policy in Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 164–179.Google Scholar
  26. Reid, G. C., L. R. Jacobsen and M. E. Anderson, 1993, Profiles in Small Business: A Competitive Strategy Approach, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Salavrakos, I. D., 1996, An Economic and Business Strategy Analysis of Joint Ventures Between Greek Enterprises and Enterprises in the Balkan Countries and Russia from the Greek Parent Company Perspective. PhD thesis, University of St Andrews, Scotland.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, J. A., 1997, Small Business Strategy: An Empirical Analysis of the Experience of New Scottish Firms. PhD thesis, University of Abertay Dundee, Scotland.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, J.A., 1998, ‘Strategies for Start-ups’, Long Range Planning 31(6), 857–872.Google Scholar
  30. Storey, D. J., 1994, Understanding the Small Business Sector, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Ward, J. H., 1963, ‘Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 236–244.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gavin C. Reid
    • 1
  • Julia A. Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics (CRIEFF)University of St AndrewsFifeScotland, UK
  2. 2.Accounting and Finance Division, Cardiff Business SchoolCardiff UniversityWalesUK

Personalised recommendations