Marketing Letters

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 51–62 | Cite as

The Effect of Windfall Gains on the Sunk-Cost Effect

  • Dilip Soman
  • Amar Cheema

Abstract

Prior research has extensively documented the sunk-cost effect – an irrational attention to irrecoverable past costs while making pending investment or consumption decisions. In a series of experiments, we show that the sunk-cost effect weakens and sometimes disappears when consumers receive a windfall (unexpected) income at the time of making a decision. This unbudgeted income allows consumers to write off their past losses, thereby eliminating the pressure to consume in order to satisfactorily close the account. We further show that the similarity between the nature of the windfall income and the past sunk-cost moderates this relationship. More generally, we argue that mental accounts can be flexible and consumers may have discretion in moving money between different mental accounts.

mental accounting sunk-cost effect windfall gains consumption and choice decisions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arkes, Hal R. and Catherine Blumer. (1985). ‘The Psychology of Sunk Cost,’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35, 124-140.Google Scholar
  2. Arkes, Hal R. Cynthia A. Joyner, Mark V. Pezzo, Jane G. Nash, Karen Siegel-Jacobs, and Eric Stone. (1994). ‘The Psychology of Windfall Gains,’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59, 331-347.Google Scholar
  3. Biyalogorsky, Eyal, William Boulding, and Richard Staelin. (1998). Stuck in the Past: Why Managers Persist with New Product Failures, Research Report no. 98-130. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Frank, Robert H. (1994). Microeconomics and Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Garland, Howard. (1990). ‘Throwing Good Money After Bad: The Effect of Sunk Costs on the Decision to Escalate Commitment to an Ongoing Project,’ Journal of Applied Psychology 75(6), 728-731.Google Scholar
  6. Garland, Howard and Stephanie Newport. (1991). ‘Effects of Absolute and Relative Sunk Costs on the Decision to Persist with a Course of Action,’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 48, 55-69.Google Scholar
  7. Gourville, John and Dilip Soman. (1998). ‘Payment Depreciation: The Behavioral Effects of Temporally Separating Payments from Consumption,’ Journal of Consumer Research 25, 160-174.Google Scholar
  8. Heath, Chip and Jack Soll. (1996). ‘Mental Budgeting and Consumer Decisions,’ Journal of Consumer Research 23, 40-52.Google Scholar
  9. Henderson, Pamela and Robert Peterson. (1992). ‘Mental Accounting and Categorization,’ Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes 51, 92-117.Google Scholar
  10. Prelec, Drazen and George Loewenstein. (1998). ‘The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt,’ Marketing Science 17(1), 4-28.Google Scholar
  11. Shefrin, Hersh and Richard Thaler. (1988). ‘The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis,’ Economic Inquiry 26 (October), 609-643.Google Scholar
  12. Soman, Dilip and John Gourville. (1998). Transaction Decoupling: The Effects of Price Bundling on the Decision to Consume. Research Report no. 98-131. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Soman, Dilip and Amar Cheema. (2000). ‘Malleable Mental Accounting: How Consumers Manipulate Mental Accounts to Justify Consumption and Spending Decisions', working paper. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  14. Staw, Barry M. (1981). ‘The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action,’ Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 577-587.Google Scholar
  15. Thaler, Richard H. (1980). ‘Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice,’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1, 39-60.Google Scholar
  16. Thaler, Richard H. (1985). ‘Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,’ Marketing Science 4, 199-214.Google Scholar
  17. Thaler, Richard H. (1999). ‘Mental Accounting Matters,’ Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12, 183-206.Google Scholar
  18. Thaler, Richard H. and Eric J. Johnson. (1990). ‘Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice,’ Management Science 36(6), 643-660.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dilip Soman
    • 1
  • Amar Cheema
    • 2
  1. 1.Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyClearwater Bay, KowloonHong Kong
  2. 2.College of BusinessUniversity of Colorado

Personalised recommendations