Landscape Ecology

, Volume 15, Issue 8, pp 741–754 | Cite as

Testing methods to produce landscape-scale presettlement vegetation maps from the U.S. public land survey records



The U.S. Public Land Survey (PLS) notebooks are one of the best records of the pre-European settlement landscape and are widely used to recreate presettlement vegetation maps. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative ability of several interpolation techniques to map this vegetation, as sampled by the PLS surveyors, at the landscape level. Field data from Sylvania Wilderness Area, MI (U.S.A.), sampled at the same scale as the PLS data, were used for this test. Sylvania is comprised of a forested landscape similar to that present during presettlement times. Data were analyzed using two Arc/Info interpolation processes and indicator kriging. The resulting maps were compared to a `correct' map of Sylvania, which was classified from aerial photographs. We found that while the interpolation methods used accurately estimated the relative forest composition of the landscape and the order of dominance of different vegetation types, they were unable to accurately estimate the actual area occupied by each vegetation type. Nor were any of the methods we tested able to recreate the landscape patterns found in the natural landscape. The most likely cause for these inabilities is the scale at which the field data (and hence the PLS data) were recorded. Therefore, these interpolation methods should not be used with the PLS data to recreate pre-European settlement vegetation at small scales (e.g., less than several townships or areas <104 ha). Recommendations are given for ways to increase the accuracy of these vegetation maps.

forest landscape hemlock-hardwoods interpolation kriging Sylvania Wilderness Area Michigan U.S. Public Land Survey 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Batek, M. J., Rebertus, A. J. and Schroeder, W. A. 1999. Reconstruction of early nineteenth-century vegetation and fire regimes in the Missouri Ozarks. J Biogeog 26: 397–412.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdo, E. A. 1956. A review of the General Land Office survey and of its use in quantitative studies of former forests. Ecology 37: 754–768.Google Scholar
  3. Comer, P. J. and Raab, J B. 1996. Michigan's native landscape: As interpreted from the General Land Office surveys, 1816–1856. Presented at 23rd Natural Areas, 15th North American Prairie, and Indiana Dunes Ecosystems Conferences. October 23–26 1996. St. Charles, Illinois, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  4. Delcourt, H. R. and Delcourt, P. A. 1996. Presettlement landscape heterogeneity: Evaluating grain of resolution using General Land Office Survey data. Landsc Ecol 11: 363–381.Google Scholar
  5. ESRI Inc. 1994a. ARC/INFO 7.0 Cell-based modeling with GRID manual. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, California, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  6. ESRI Inc. 1994b. ARC/INFO 7.0 Surface modeling with TIN manual. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, California, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  7. ESRI Inc. 1994c. ARC/INFO 7.0 Arc Commands. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, California, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  8. Fassett, N. C. 1944. Vegetation of the Brule Basin, past and present (Brule River Survey: Paper No. 4). Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters 36: 33–56.Google Scholar
  9. Finley, R. W. 1951. Original vegetation cover of Wisconsin. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  10. Foster, D. R., Orwig, D. A. and McLachlan, J. S. 1996. Ecological and conservation insights from reconstructive studies of temperate old-growth forests. Tree 11: 419–424.Google Scholar
  11. Frelich, L. E., Calcote, R. R., Davis, M. B. and Pastor, J. 1993. Patch formation and maintenance in an old-growth hemlock-hardwood forest. Ecology 74: 513–527.Google Scholar
  12. Galatowitsch, S. M. 1990. Using the original land survey notes to reconstruct presettlement landscapes in the American west. Great Basin Nat 50: 181–191.Google Scholar
  13. Grimm, E. C. 1984. Fire and other factors controlling the Big Woods vegetation of Minnesota in the mid-nineteenth century. Ecol Monog 54: 291–311.Google Scholar
  14. Hushen, T. W., Kapp, R. O., Bogue, R. D. and Worthington, J. T. 1966. Presettlement forest patterns in Montcalm County, Michigan. Michigan Bot 5: 192–211.Google Scholar
  15. Isaaks, E. H. and Srivastava, R. M. 1989. An Introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  16. Iverson, L. R. 1988. Land-use changes in Illinois, U.S.A: The influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use. Landsc Ecol 2: 45–61.Google Scholar
  17. Jordan, J. K. 1973. A soil resources inventory of the Sylvania Recreation Area. Unpublished report. U.S. Forest Service, Ottawa National Forest, Ironwood, Michigan, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  18. Kapp, R. O. 1978. Presettlement forests of the Pine River watershed (central Michigan) based on original land survey records. The Michigan Bot 17: 3–15.Google Scholar
  19. Lillesand, T. M. and Kiefer, R. W. 1979. Remote sensing and image interpretation. Third edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, U.S.AGoogle Scholar
  20. Manies, K. L. 1997. Evaluation of General Land Office survey records for analysis of the northern Great Lakes hemlockhardwood forests. M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  21. MathSoft Inc. 1996. S+SpatialStats user's manual, version 1.0. MathSoft Inc., Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  22. Mladenoff, D. J. and Howell, E. A. 1980. Vegetation change on the Gogebic Iron Range (Iron County, Wisconsin) from the 1860's to present. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters 68: 74–89.Google Scholar
  23. Mladenoff, D. J. and Pastor, J. 1993. Sustainable Forest Ecosystems in the northern hardwood and conifer forest region: concepts and management. In Defining Sustainable Forestry. Edited by G. H. Aplet, N. Johnson, J. T. Olson, and V. A. Sample. pp. 145–180. Island Press, Washington, D.C., U.S.AGoogle Scholar
  24. Mladenoff, D. J., White, M. A., Pastor, J. and Crow, T. R. 1993. Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecol Appl 3: 294–306.Google Scholar
  25. Pastor, J. and Broschart, M. 1990. The spatial pattern of a northern conifer-hardwood landscape. Landsc Ecol 4: 55–68.Google Scholar
  26. Radeloff, V. C., Mladenoff, D. J., He, H. S. and Boyce, M. S. 1999. Forest landscape change in the northwestern Wisconsin Pine Barrens from pre-European settlement to the present. Can J For Res 29: 1649–1659.Google Scholar
  27. Runkle, J. R. 1982. Patterns of disturbance in some old-growth mesic forests of eastern North America. Ecology 63: 1533–1546.Google Scholar
  28. Sonin. 1995. Sonin Combo Pro electronic distance measuring tool instruction manual. Sonin Inc., Brewster, New York, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  29. Stewart, L. O. 1935. Public land surveys; history, instructions, methods. Collegiate Press, Inc., Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  30. Stroessner, W. J. and Habeck, J. R. 1966. The presettlement vegetation of Iowa County, Wisconsin. Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters 55: 167–180.Google Scholar
  31. Tiner, R. W., Jr., Zinni, W. and Drake, K. 1987. An update of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wetlands Inventory project. In Atlantic White Cedar Wetlands. pp. 339–342. Edited by A. D. Laderman. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  32. White, M. A. and Mladenoff, D. J. 1994. Old growth forest landscape transitions from pre-European settlement to present. Landsc Ecol 9: 191–205.Google Scholar
  33. Whitney, G. G. 1994. From coastal wilderness to fruited plain: a history of environmental change in temperate North America, 1500 to the present. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  34. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 1992. A user's guide to the Wisconsin Wetland Inventory. Publication WZ022. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest Ecology and ManagementUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations