Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 12, Issue 3–5, pp 527–534 | Cite as

The role of microalgae in aquaculture: situation and trends

  • Arnaud Muller-Feuga


Algae are utilized diversely in aquaculture, but theirmain applications are related to nutrition. They areused in toto, as a sole component or as a foodadditive to supply basic nutrients, color the flesh ofsalmonids or for other biological activities. The needfor nutritional sources safer than traditional animalproducts has renewed interest in plants in general andalgae in particular. This report deals principallywith the nutritional role of microalgae inaquaculture.The larvae of molluscs, echinoderms andcrustaceans as well as the live prey of some fishlarvae feed on microalgae. Though attempts have beenmade to substitute inert particles for thesemicro-organisms which are difficult to produce,concentrate and store, only shrimp and live prey forfish will accept inert food, and only shrimp accept itfully. Several studies have confirmed that a live,multi-specific, low-bacteria microalgal biomassremains essential for shellfish hatcheries. Majoradvances are expected from new production systemdesigns and operations, from batch-run open tanks tomore sophisticated continuously run and closed loopreactors. Studies are underway to simplify hatcheryoperations by replacing biomass produced on-site withrun-times by that produced and preserved elsewhere.Although still promising, they have not given rise, sofar, to any application for molluscs. Otherapplications of microalgae in aquaculture, from greenwater to making salmon flesh pinker, are examined.Whether produced on or off-site, there remains thequestion of cost effectiveness of microalgalproduction systems. This can only be achieved bysubstantial upscaling and improved quality control.

aquaculture fish hatchery microalgae molluscs phytoplankton post-larvae shrimp 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Apt KE, Behrens PW (1999) Commercial developments in microalgal biotechnology. J. Phycol. 35: 215-226.Google Scholar
  2. Barille L, Bougrier S, Geairon P, Robert JM (1994) Experimental feeding of the oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg) with three populations of different-sized modes of the diatom Haslea ostrearia Simonsen. Oceanol. Acta 17: 201-210.Google Scholar
  3. Benemann JR (1992) Microalgae aquaculture feeds, J. appl. Phycol. 4: 233-245.Google Scholar
  4. Borowitzka MA, Huisman JM, Osborn A (1991) Culture of the astaxanthin-producing green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. 1. Effects of nutrients on growth and cell type. J. appl. Phycol. 3: 295-304.Google Scholar
  5. Borowitzka MA (1996) Closed algal photobioreactors: Design considerations for large-scale systems. J. mar. Biotechn. 4: 185-191.Google Scholar
  6. Dhert P, Divanach P, Kentouri M, Sorgeloos P (1998) Rearing techniques for difficult fish larvae. World Aquacult. 29: 48-55.Google Scholar
  7. Gladue RM (1998) Heterotrophic microalgae as an inexpensive feed for rotifer. J. Shellfish Res. 17: 325-326.Google Scholar
  8. Grizel H, Tige G (1982) Evolution of the haemocytic disease caused by Bonamia ostreae. In Invertebrate Pathology and Microbial Control. Society for Invertebrate Pathology, Brighton, UK, pp. 258-260.Google Scholar
  9. Grizel H, Heral M (1991) Introduction into France of the Japanese oyster (Crassostrea gigas). J. Cons. CIEM 47: 399-403.Google Scholar
  10. Longhurst A, Sathyendranah S, Platt T, Caverhill C (1995) An estimate of global primary production in the ocean from satellite radiometer data. J. Plankton Res. 17: 1245-1271.Google Scholar
  11. Muller-Feuga A (1997) Microalgues Marines, Les Enjeux de la Recherche. Ifremer, Plouzané, France, 35 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Muller-Feuga A, Gudin C, Grima EM, Minkoff G, Tredici M, Raineri S, Robert R (1998) Microalgae biomass from photobioreactors as food for fish and shellfish larvae. European Comm. Proj. AIR1-CT92-286. Third Europ. Marine Sc. & Tech. Conf., Project synopses, Lisbon-Portugal 20: 33-35.Google Scholar
  13. Newkirk GF (1991) Aquaculture in Sungo Bay, China. Austasia Aquacult. 5: 8-11.Google Scholar
  14. Paillard C, Maes P, Oubella R (1994) Brown ring disease in clams. Annu. Rev. Fish Dis. 4: 219-240.Google Scholar
  15. Pauly D, Christensen V (1995) Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374: 255-257.Google Scholar
  16. Robert R, Trintignac P (1997) Substitues for live microalagae in mariculture: A review. Aquat. Living Resour. 10: 315-327.Google Scholar
  17. Rosenberry B (ed.) (1998) World Shrimp Farming. Shrimp News Int. San Diego, CA, USA, 328 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Sanderson GW, Jolly AF (1994) The value of Phaffia yeast as a feed ingredient for salmonid fish. Aquaculture 124: 193-200.Google Scholar
  19. Shatz Y (1999) Fishstat Plus 2.19, FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  20. Tang Q, Fang J (1999) Aquaculture of scallops in China. Abstracts of the 12th Int. Pectinid Workshop, Bergen-Norway, 1 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Verdelho Vieira V, Baylina N (1995) Necton microalgae biotechnology directory. Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, 131 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnaud Muller-Feuga
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Français pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (Ifremer)Nantes cedex 03France

Personalised recommendations