Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 11, Issue 5–6, pp 489–503 | Cite as

Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children

  • Kate Cain
  • Jane V. Oakhill
Article

Abstract

Young children's reading comprehension skill is associated with their ability to draw inferences (Oakhill 1982, 1984). An experiment was conducted to investigate the direction of this relation and to explore possible sources of inferential failure. Three groups of children participated: Same-age skilled and less skilled comprehenders, and a comprehension-age match group. The pattern of performance indicated that the ability to make inferences was not a by-product of good reading comprehension, rather that good inference skills are a plausible cause of good reading comprehension ability. Failure to make inferences could not be attributed to lack of relevant general knowledge. Instead, the pattern of errors indicated that differences in reading strategy were the most likely source of these group differences.

Causal relations General knowledge Inference making ability Reading comprehension Young children 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, L. & Stein, N. (1981). The development of prose comprehension skills. In: C. M. Santa & B. L. Hayes (eds.), Children's prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 7–43). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  2. Cain, K. & Oakhill, J. (1996). The nature of the relation between comprehension skill and the ability to tell a story, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 14: 187–201.Google Scholar
  3. Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V. & Bryant, P. E. (2000). Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12(2000), forthcoming.Google Scholar
  4. Casteel,M. A. & Simpson, G. B. (1991). Textual coherence and the development of inferential generation skills, Journal of Research in Reading 14: 116–129.Google Scholar
  5. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C. & Pintillie, D. (1982). British picture vocabulary scale. NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  6. Garner, R. & Kraus, C. (1981–1982). Good and poor comprehender differences in knowing and regulating reading behaviors, Educational Research Quarterly 6(4): 5–12.Google Scholar
  7. Garnham, A. (1985). Psycholinguistics: Central topics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  8. Garnham, A. & Oakhill, J. (1996). The mental models theory of language comprehension. In: B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 313–339). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Gates, A. I. & MacGinitie, W. H. (1965). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. New York: Columbia University Teachers' College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M. & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension, Psychological Review 101: 371–395.Google Scholar
  12. Howell, D. C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd edn. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J. & Seely, M. R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing, Journal of Experimental Psychology 20: 1245–1470.Google Scholar
  15. Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J. & Seely, M. R. (1997). Individual differences in readers' sentenceand text-level representations, Journal of Memory and Language 36: 129–145.Google Scholar
  16. Neale, M. D. (1989). The Neale analysis of reading ability-revised British edition. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  17. Oakhill, J. V. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders' memory for sentences, British Journal of Psychology 73: 13–20.Google Scholar
  18. Oakhill, J. V. (1983). Instantiation in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 35A: 441–450.Google Scholar
  19. Oakhill, J. V. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories, British Journal of Educational Psychology 54: 31–39.Google Scholar
  20. Omanson, R. C., Warren, W. M. & Trabasso, T. (1978). Goals, inferential comprehension and recall of stories by children, Discourse Processes 1: 337–354.Google Scholar
  21. Paris, S. G. & Lindauer, B. K. (1976). The role of inference in children's comprehension and memory for sentence, Cognitive Psychology 8: 217–227.Google Scholar
  22. Paris, S. G. & Upton, L. R. (1976). Children's memory for inferential relations in prose, Child Development 47: 660–668.Google Scholar
  23. Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In: M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479–515). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Stothard, S. E. & Hulme, C. (1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children: The role of language comprehension and working memory skills, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4: 245–256.Google Scholar
  25. Van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In: M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539–588). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Yuill, N. & Joscelyne, T. (1988). Effect of organisational cues and strategies on good and poor comprehenders' story understanding, Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 152–158.Google Scholar
  27. Yuill, N. M. & Oakhill, J. V. (1988). Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension, Applied Cognitive Psychology 2: 33–45.Google Scholar
  28. Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children's problems in text comprehension.An experimental investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Cain
    • 1
  • Jane V. Oakhill
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of SussexUK

Personalised recommendations