Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the nutritional value of proteins obtained from Ulva armoricana

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The in vitro digestibility of Ulva armoricana proteins by trypsin, chymotrypsin and human intestinal juice was determined to evaluate their nutritional value. The amino acid composition of the protein fraction and its changes during a sampling period from October to February were also studied. Some differences in the protein pattern shown by SDS PAGE were found in different months, such as the presence of a 54 kDa protein in February. The protein fraction is composed mainly of aspartic and glutamic acids (24–35% of protein fraction, according to season) and the essential amino acids constitute 27–36% of the total fraction. The efficiencies of trypsin and chymotrypsin in Ulva protein digestion are comparable. Only four proteins with apparent molecular weights of 86, 68, 40, and 29 KDa are digested by these proteolytic systems. The proteins from the October sample were more sensitive to chymotrypsin than those from the February sample. For instance, two proteins with apparent molecular weights of 100 and 67 kDa were weakly digested by chymotrypsin in the February extract, were fully digested in the October sample. The February sample differed from two others in the presence of glycosylated proteins, most of which have apparent molecular weights higher than 43 KDa. With the October sample, the activity of human intestinal juice was more effective than two other proteolytic systems. This is especially evident with a 27 kDa protein, which was only partially digested by the intestinal liquid and not digested by chymotrypsin or trypsin. However, human intestinal juice in the February apparently did not attack the 27 kDa protein. These data suggest a change in protein structure making it less sensitive to human intestinal juice. The glycosylation of protein extract, which was especially marked in February, could explain the differences in behaviour of U. armoricana proteins in response to the digestive action of human enzymes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Fattha AF, Sary HH (1987) Selective isolation of glycoprotein materials from the green seaweed Ulva lactuca. Pakistan J. Biochem. 20: 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni G, Stancher B (1973) Valutazione della qualita delle frazione proteica di alcune laghe dell’ alto Adriatico. Rassegna chimica 3: 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coat G, Dion P, Noailles MC, de Reviers B, Fontaine JM, Berger-Perrot Y, Loiseaux-De Goër S (1998) Ulva armoricana sp. nov. (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) from the coasts of Brittany (France). II. Nuclear rDNA ITS sequence analysis. Eur. J. Phycol. 33: 73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dion P, De Reviers B, Coat G (1998) Ulva armoricana sp. nov. (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) from the coasts of Brittany (France). Morphological identification. Eur. J. Phycol. 33: 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurence J, Le Coeur C, Mabeau S, Maurice M, Landrein A (1995) Comparison of different extractive procedures for proteins from the edible seaweeds Ulva armoricana and Ulva rotundata. J. appl. Phycol. 7: 577–582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fowden L (1954) A comparison of the composition of some algal proteins. Ann. Bot. 71: 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara-Arasaki T, Mino T, Kuroda M (1984) The protein value in human nutrition of edible marine algae in Japan. Hydrobiologia 116/117: 513–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hames BD (1990) One-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In Hames BD, Rickwood D (eds), Gel Electrophoresis of Proteins: A Practical Approach. IRL Press Limited Oxford, New-York, Tokyo: 1–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indegaard M, Minsaas J (1991) Animal and human nutrition. In Guiry M, Blunden G (eds), Seaweed Resources in Europe. Uses and Potential. J. Wiley & Sons, New-York: 21–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabeau S, Fleurence J (1993) Seaweed in food products: biochemical and nutritional aspects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 4: 103–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan KC, Wright JLC, Simpson FJ (1980) Review of chemical constituents of the red alga Palmaria palmata. Econ. Bot. 34: 27–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nisizawa K, Noda H, Kikuchi R, Watanabe T (1987) The main seaweed foods in Japan. Hydrobiologia 151/152: 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochiai Y, Katsugari T, Hashimoto K (1987) Proteins in three seaweeds, ‘Aosa’ Ulva lactuca, ‘Arame’ Eisenia bicyclis and ‘Makusa’ Gelidium amansii. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 53: 1051–1055.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh H, Creamer LK (1993) In vitro digestibility of whey protein / k-casein complexes isolated from heated concentred milk. J. Food Sci. 58: 299–302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson EW, Preston RD (1967) Protein in the cell walls of some green algae. Nature 213: 684–685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleurence, J., Chenard, E. & Luçcon, M. Determination of the nutritional value of proteins obtained from Ulva armoricana. Journal of Applied Phycology 11, 231–239 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008067308100

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008067308100

Navigation