Marketing Letters

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 249–266 | Cite as

Advances in Research on Mental Accounting and Reason-Based Choice

  • Ran Kivetz


Research extending over twenty years in behavioral decision theory has led to the development of two important research streams — mental accounting and reason-based choice. This paper explores recent research on the role of mental accounting and reason-based choice in the construction of consumer preferences. Evidence suggests that the principles of mental accounting often regulate the purchase and consumption of luxuries and that reasons may play an important part in this process. In particular, buying and consuming luxury goods tends to call for reasons and justification and can evoke intra-personal conflict that might be resolved with the aid of mental accounting. Moreover, reasons can serve as important building blocks in the formation and grouping of mental accounts. The current paper also discusses the construction of preferences as a process where, in certain cases, consumers choose reasons rather than options. Among other things, focusing on reasons can lead to discrepancies between decisions and consumption experiences, preference intransitivity, and unconventional choices. Directions for future research are discussed.

Behavioral decision theory consumer choice mental accounting reason-based choice self-control 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bazerman, Max H., Ann E. Tenbrunsel, and Kimberly Wade-Benzoni. (1998). “Negotiating With Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions With Competing Internal Preferences, ” Northwestern University working paper.Google Scholar
  2. Bettman, James R., Eric J. Johnson, and John W. Payne (1991), “Consumer Decision Making, ” in Thomas S. Robertson and Harold H. Kassarjian (eds.), Handbook of Consumer Behavior, Chapter 2, 50–84, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Degeorge, Francois, Jay Patel, and Richard Zeckhauser. (1999). “Earnings Management to Exceed Thresholds, ” Journal of Business, (January).Google Scholar
  4. Dhar, Ravi. (1997). “Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option, ” Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 215–231.Google Scholar
  5. -and Itamar Simonson. (1999). “Mental Accounting in Investor Decision Making, ” Stanford University working paper.Google Scholar
  6. Gibbs, Brian J. (1999). “Direction Theory: Inward Versus Outward Decision Making, Chameleonic Consumers, and the Self-Manipulation of Tastes, ” working paper, Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.Google Scholar
  7. Gourville, John T. and Dilip Soman. (1998). “Payment Depreciation: The Effects of Temporally Separating Payments from Consumption, ” Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 160–174.Google Scholar
  8. Heath, Chip and Jack B. Soll. (1996). “Mental Budgeting and Consumer Decisions, ” Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (June), 40–52.Google Scholar
  9. Huber, Joel, John W. Payne, and Christopher Puto. (1982). “Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis, ” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (June), 90–98.Google Scholar
  10. Hsee, Christopher K. (1996). “The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives, ” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 247–257.Google Scholar
  11. -and H. Kunreuther. (1999). “Insurance Purchase as an Expression of Feelings, ” Paper in preparation, the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. -and Eldar Shafir. (1999). “Inconsistencies Between Decision and Consumption Experience, ” Paper in preparation. Center for Decision Research. The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky. (1984). “Choices, Values, and Frames, ” The American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.Google Scholar
  14. Kivetz, Ran and Itamar Simonson. (1999a). “The Joyless Consumer: Using Self-Control Strategies to Increase Hedonic Consumption, ” Stanford University working paper.Google Scholar
  15. -and Itamar Simonson. (1999b). “The Effects of Incomplete Information on Consumer Choice, ” Stanford University working paper.Google Scholar
  16. Langer, Ellen J.(1975). “The Illusion of Control, ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.Google Scholar
  17. Leclerc, France and Richard H. Thaler. (1999). “When a Dollar Off is Worth More Than a Dollar, ” University of Chicago working paper.Google Scholar
  18. Loewenstein, George. (1996). “Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior, ” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Montgomery, Henry (1989), “From Cognition to Action: The Search for Dominance in Decision Making, ” in H. Montgomery and O. Svenson (eds.), Process and Structure in Human Decision Making, Chapter 2, 23–49, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Nowlis, Stephen M. and Itamar Simonson (1997), “Attribute-Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals, ” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (May), 205–218.Google Scholar
  21. O'Curry, Suzanne. (1999). “Income Source Effects, ” unpublished working paper, DePaul University.Google Scholar
  22. Odean, Terrace. (1998). “Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?” Journal of Finance, (October).Google Scholar
  23. Payne, John W., James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson. (1992). “Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective, ” Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87–131.Google Scholar
  24. Prelec, Drazen. (1991). “Values and Principles: Some Limitations on Traditional Economic Analysis, ” in A. Etzioni & P. Lawrence (eds.), Socioeconomics: Toward a New Synthesis. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  25. -and Richard J. Herrnstein.(1991). “Preferences or Principles: Alternative Guidelines for Choice, ” in Richard J. Zeckhauser (eds.), Strategy and Choice. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 319–340.Google Scholar
  26. -and George Loewenstein. (1998). “The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt, ” Marketing Science, 17(1), 4–28.Google Scholar
  27. Shafir, Eldar, Itamar Simonson, and Amos Tversky. (1993). “Reason-Based Choice, ” Cognition, 49(1–2) (October-November, 11-36.Google Scholar
  28. -and Richard H. Thaler. (1999). “Invest Now, Drink Later, Spend Never: The Mental accounting of Advanced Purchases, ” University of Chicago working paper.Google Scholar
  29. Shefrin, Hersh M. and Meir Statman. (1987). “The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long, ” Journal of Finance, 1987, 40, 777–790.Google Scholar
  30. Simonson, Itamar and Stephan Nowlis. (1999). “Constructive Decision Making in a Social Context: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons, ” Stanford University working paper.Google Scholar
  31. -and Amos Tversky. (1992). “Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion, ” Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (August), 281–295.Google Scholar
  32. Slovic, Paul and David MacPhillamy. (1974). “Dimensional Commensurability and Cue Utilization in Comparative Judgment, ” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 172–194.Google Scholar
  33. Snell, Jackie, Brian J. Gibbs, and Carol Varey. (1995). “Intuitive Hedonics: Consumer Beliefs About the Dynamics of Liking, ” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(1), 33–60.Google Scholar
  34. Snyder, C. R. and Howard L. Fromkin. (1977). “Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness, ” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5) (Oct.), 518–527.Google Scholar
  35. Soman, Dilip and John T. Gourville. (1998). “Transaction Decoupling: The Effects of Price Bundling on the Decision to Consume, ” Marketing Science Institute working paper # 98–131, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  36. Thaler, Richard H. (1980). “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice, ” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60.Google Scholar
  37. -.(1985). “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice, ” Marketing Science, 4 (Summer), 199–214.Google Scholar
  38. -.(1999). “Mental Accounting Matters, ” forthcoming in Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (eds.), Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. -and Hersh M. Shefrin. (1981). “An Economic Theory of Self-Control, ” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 392–410.Google Scholar
  40. Wertenbroch, Klaus. (1998). “Consumption Self-Control by Rationing Purchase Quantities of Virtue and Vice, ” Marketing Science, 17(4), 317–337.Google Scholar
  41. Wilson, Timothy D. and Jonathan W. Schooler. (1991). “Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions, ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2) (February), 181–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ran Kivetz
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of BusinessStanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations