Landscape Ecology

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 271–283 | Cite as

Predicting Southern Appalachian overstory vegetation with digital terrain data

  • Paul V. Bolstad
  • Wayne Swank
  • James Vose


Vegetation in mountainous regions responds to small-scale variation in terrain, largely due to effects on both temperature and soil moisture. However there are few studies of quantitative, terrain-based methods for predicting vegetation composition. This study investigated relationships between forest composition, elevation, and a derived index of terrain shape, and evaluates methods for predicting forest composition. Trees were measured on 406 permanent plots within the boundaries of the Coweeta Hydrologic Lab, located in the Southern Appalachian Mountains of western North Carolina, USA. All plots were in control watersheds, without human or major natural disturbance since 1923. Plots were 0.08 ha and arrayed on transects, with approximately 380 meters between parallel transects. Breast-height diameters were measured on all trees. Elevation and terrain shape (cove, ridge, sideslope) were estimated for each plot. Density (trees/ha) and basal area were summarized by species and by forest type (cove, xeric oak-pine, northern hardwoods, and mixed deciduous). Plot data were combined with a digital elevation data (DEM), and a derived index of terrain shape at two sampling resolutions: 30 m (US Geological Survey), and 80 m (Defense Mapping Agency) sources. Vegetation maps were produced using each of four different methods: 1) linear regression with and without log transformations against elevation and terrain variables combined with cartographic overlay, 2) kriging, 3) co-kriging, and 4) a mosaic diagram. Predicted vegetation was compared to known vegetation at each of 77 independent, withheld data points, and an error matrix was determined for each mapping method.

We observed strong relationships between some species and elevation and/or terrain shape. Cove and xeric oak/pine species basal areas were positively and negatively related to concave landscape locations, respectively, while species typically found in the mixed deciduous and northern hardwood types were not. Most northern hardwood species occurred more frequently and at higher basal areas as elevation increased, while most other species did not respond to elevation. The regression and mosaic diagram mapping approaches had significantly higher mapping accuracies than kriging and co-kriging. There were significant effects of DEM resolution on map accuracy, with maps based on 30 m DEM data significantly more accurate than those based on 80 m data. Taken together, these results indicate that both the mapping method and terrain data resolution significantly affect the resultant vegetation maps, even when using relatively high resolution data. Landscape or regional models based on 100 m or lower resolution terrain data may significantly under-represent terrain-related variation in vegetation composition.

deciduous forests community composition prediction landscape DEM terrain shape 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aber J.D., C. Dricsol, C.A. Federer, R.G. Lathrop, G. Lovett, J.M. Mellillo, P. Steudler and J. Vogelmann, 1993. A strategy for the regional analysis of the effects of physical and chemical climate change on biogeochemical cycles in northeastern U.S. forests. Ecological Modeling 67: 37–47.Google Scholar
  2. Ågren, G., R. E. McMurtrie, W. J. Parton, J. Pastor and H.H. Shugart, 1991. State-of the art of models of productiondecomposition linkages in conifer and grassland ecosystems. Ecological Applications 1: 118–138.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, B.V., 1991. Deciduous forests of North America. In Temperate Deciduous Forests. 635 pp. Edited by E. Röhrig and B. Ulrich. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, R.G., 1980. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. USDA For. Serv. Misc. Publ. No 1391, 77 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, R.G., 1996. Ecosystem Geography. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 204 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Barbour, M., 1988. California Upland Forests and Woodlands. In North American Terrestrial Vegetation. 434 pp. Edited by M. Barbour and W. Billings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bieri, R. and S.F. Anliot, 1965. The structure and floristic composition of a virgin hemlock forest in West Virginia. Castanea 30: 205–226.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, E.L., 1950. Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America. McGraw-Hill, New York, 596 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Blaszczynski, J.S., 1997. Landform characterization with geographic information systems. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63: 183–191.Google Scholar
  10. Burrough, P.A., 1986. Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 194 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Cain, S.A., 1931. Ecologcal studies of the vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains of North Carolina and Tennesee. I. Soil reaction and plant disturbance. Botanical Gazette 91: 22–41.Google Scholar
  12. Cressie, N., 1991. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York, 900 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, F.W. and S. Goetz, 1990. Modeling vegetation pattern using digital terrain data. Landscape Ecology 4: 69–80.Google Scholar
  14. Day, F.P. and C. D. Monk, 1974. Vegetation patterns on a southern Appalachian watershed. Ecology 34: 329–346.Google Scholar
  15. Day, F.P., D.L. Phillips and C.D. Monk, 1988. Forest communities and patterns. In Forest Hydrology and Ecology at Coweeta. 469 pp. Edited by W.T. Swank and D.A. Crossley, Jr. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  16. Douglass, J.E. and M.D. Hoover, 1988. History of Coweeta. In Forest Hydrology and Ecology at Coweeta. 469 pp. Edited by W.T. Swank and D.A. Crossley, Jr. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  17. Elliot, K.J., W.T. Swank, J.M. Vose and P.V. Bolstad, 1997. Longterm patterns of a Southern Appalachian Forest – Vegetation-Site Relationships. Submitted to Canadian Journal of Forest Research.Google Scholar
  18. Eyre, F.H. 1980. Forest Cover Types of United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, D.C., 148 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Garren, K.H., 1943. Effects of fire on vegetation of the southeastern United States. Botanical Reviews 9: 617–654.Google Scholar
  20. Golden, M.S., 1981. An integrated multivariate analysis of forest communities of the central Great Smoky Mountains, American Midland Naturalist 10.Google Scholar
  21. Harshberger, J.W., 1903. An ecological study of the flora of mountainous North Carolina. Botanical Gazette 36: 241–258.Google Scholar
  22. Hatcher, R.D. Jr., 1988. Bedrock geology and regional geologic setting of Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in the Eastern Blue Ridge. In Forest Hydrology and Ecology at Coweeta. 469 pp. Edited by W.T. Swank and D.A. Crossley, Jr. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  23. Holdridge, L.R., 1947. Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 105: 367–368.Google Scholar
  24. Isaaks, E.H. and R.M. Srivastava, 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 561 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Küchler, A.W., 1964. The potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. Amer. Geogr. Soc. Spec. Publ. No. 36, 145 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Lindsey, A.A. and J.O. Sawyer, 1970. Vegetation-climate relationships in the eastern United States. Proc. Indiana Academy of Science 80: 210–214.Google Scholar
  27. Lindsey, A.A. and L.K. Escobar, 1976. Eastern Deciduous Forests, 2. Beech-Maple Region. NPS Publ. 148, Nation. Park Serv., U.S. Dept. Int., 238 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Lorimer, C.G., 1980. Age structure and disturbance history of a southern Appalachian virgin forest. Ecology 61: 1169–1184.Google Scholar
  29. McNab, W.H., 1989. Terrain shape index: quantifying effect of minor landforms on tree height. Forest Science 35: 91–104.Google Scholar
  30. Meiners, T.M., D.W. Smith, T.L. Sharik and D.E. Beck, 1984. Soil and plant water stress in an Appalachian oak forest in relation to topography and stand age. Plant Soil 80: 171–179.Google Scholar
  31. Nelson, T.C., 1955. Chestnut replacement in the southern highlands. Ecology 36: 352–353.Google Scholar
  32. Nichols, G.E., 1935. The hemlock-white pine-northern hardwood region of eastern North America. Ecology 16: 403–422.Google Scholar
  33. Oosting, H.J. and P.F. Bordeau, 1955. Virgin hemlock forest segregates in the Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest of western North Carolina. Botanical Gazette 116: 340–359.Google Scholar
  34. Peet, R. 1988. Forests of the Rocky Mountains. In North American Terrestrial Vegetation. 434 pp. Edited by M. Barbour and W. Billings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Phillips, D.L. and W.H. Murdy, 1985. Effects of rhododendron (Rhododendron maximum L.) on regeneration of southern Appalachian hardwoods. Forest Sciences 31: 226–233.Google Scholar
  36. Runkle, J.R., 1982. Patterns of disturbance in some old-growth mesic forests of eastern North America. Ecology 63: 1533–1546.Google Scholar
  37. Skidmore, A., 1989. A comparison of techniques for calculating gradient and aspect from a gridded digital elevation model. Int. J. Geographical Info. Sys. 3: 323–334Google Scholar
  38. Stephenson, S.L., 1974. Ecological composition of some former oak-chestnut communities in western Virginia. Castanea 39: 278–286.Google Scholar
  39. Swank, W.T. and D.A. Crossley, Jr., 1988. Introduction and site description. In Forest Hydrology and Ecology at Coweeta. 469 pp. Edited by W.T. Swank and D.A. Crossley, Jr. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  40. Swift, L.W., Jr., G.B. Cunningham and J.E. Douglass, 1988. Climatology and Hydrology. In Forest Hydrology and Ecology at Coweeta. 469 pp. Edited by W.T. Swank and D.A. Crossley, Jr. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  41. USGS, 1990. Digital Elevation Models Data User's Guide 5. Reston, Virginia, USA, 51 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Whittaker, R.H., 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26: 1–80.Google Scholar
  43. Woods, F.W. and R.E. Shanks, 1959. Natural replacement of chestnut by other species. Ecology 40: 349–361.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul V. Bolstad
    • 1
  • Wayne Swank
    • 2
  • James Vose
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Coweeta Hydrologic Lab, SFES, USFSOttoUSA

Personalised recommendations