Cytotechnology

, 29:177 | Cite as

Reactor design for large scale suspension animal cell culture

  • J. Varley
  • J. Birch
Article

Abstract

The scale of operation of freely suspended animal cell culture has been increasing and in order to meet the demand for recombinant therapeutic products, this increase is likely to continue. The most common reactor types used are stirred tanks. Air lift fermenters are also used, albeit less commonly. No specific guidelines have been published for large scale (≥10 000 L) animal cell culture and reactor designs are often based on those used for microbial systems. However, due to the large difference in energy inputs used for microbial and animal cell systems such designs may be far from optimal. In this review the importance of achieving a balance between mixing, mass transfer and shear effects is emphasised. The implications that meeting this balance has on design of vessels and operation, particularly in terms of strategies to ensure adequate mixing to achieve homogeneity in pH and dissolved gas concentrations are discussed.

air lift fermenters animal cell culture scale up stirred tanks 

References

  1. Ade Bello R, Robinson CW and Moo Young M (1984) Liquid circulation and mixing characteristics of air lift contactors. Canadian Journal Chemical Engineering 62: 573-577.Google Scholar
  2. Ade Bello R, Robinson CW and Moo Young M (1985a) Prediction of the volumetric mass transfer coefficients in pneumatic contactors. Chem Eng Sci 40(1): 53-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ade Bello R, Robinson CW and Moo Young M (1985b) Gas holdup and overall volumetric transfer coefficient in airlift contactors. Biotech Bioeng 27: 369-381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adler I and Schugerl K (1983) Cultivation of E-coli in single and ten-stage tower-loop reactors. Biotech Bioeng 25: 417-436.-cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Rubeai M, Singh MH, Goldman MH and Emery AN (1995) Death mechanisms of animal cells in conditions of intensive agitation. Biotech Bioeng 45: 463-472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asai T, Sano T and Itoh K (1992) Scale up of fermentation. Biotech Forum Europe 9(9): 556-550.Google Scholar
  7. Aunins JG, Woodson BA, Hale TK and Wang DIC (1989) Effects of paddle impeller geometry on power input and mass transfer in small scale animal cell culture vessels. Biotech Bioeng 34: 1127-1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aunins JG and Henzler HJ (1993) Aeration in cell culture bioreactors, Chapter 11 In Biotechnology V 3: Bioprocessing, Stephanopoulos G (Ed) VCH, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 219-281.Google Scholar
  9. Backer MP, Metzger LS, Slaber PL, Nevitt KL and Boder GB (1988) Large scale production of monoclonal antibodies in suspension culture. Biotech Bioeng 32: 993-1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bajpai RK and Reuss M (1982) Coupling of mixing and microbial kinetics for evaluating the performance of bioreactors. Canadian Journal Chemical Engineering 60: 384-392.Google Scholar
  11. Bakker WAM, van Can HJL, Tramper, J and de Goijer CD (1993) Hydrodynamics and mixing in a multiple air lift loop reactor. Biotech Bioeng 42: 994-1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bakker WAM, den Hertog M, Tramper J and de Gooijer CD (1995) Oxygen transfer in a multiple air-lift loop reactor Bioprocess Engineering 12: 167-172.Google Scholar
  13. Birch JR, Bonnerjea J, Flatman S and Vranch S (1995) The production of monoclonal antibodies, Chapter 5, In Monoclonal antibodies, Birch JR and Lennox ES (Eds) Wiley-Liss, New York, U.S.A., pp. 231-265.Google Scholar
  14. Birch JR, Thompson PW, Lambert K and Boraston R (1985) The large scale cultivation of hybridoma cells producing monoclonal antibodies, In Large scale mammalian cell culture, Feder J and Tolbert WR (Eds) Academic Press Inc, Orlando, pp. 1-16.Google Scholar
  15. Blenke H (1979) Loop reactors, In Advances in Biochemical Engineering, Vol. 13, Ghose TK, Fiechter A and Blakebrough N (Eds) Springer Verlag, New York, U.S.A., pp. 121-214.Google Scholar
  16. Bliem R and Katinger H (1988a) Scale up engineering in animal cell technology: Part I, Trends in Biotechnology 6: 190-195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bliem R and Katinger H (1988b) Scale up engineering in animal cell technology: Part II, Trends in Biotechnology 6: 224-230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boraston R, Thompson PW, Garland S and Birch JR (1984) Growth and oxygen requirements of antibody producing mouse hybridoma cells in suspension culture. Develop Biol Standard 55: 103-111.Google Scholar
  19. Born C, Zhang Z, Al-Rubeai M and Thomas CR (1992) Estimation of disruption of animal cells by laminar shear stress. Biotech Bioeng 40: 1004-1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Borys MC, Linzer DIH and Papoutsakis ET (1994) Ammonia affects the glycosylation patterns of recombinant mouse placental lactogen-I by chinese hamster ovary cells in a pH dependent manner. Biotech Bioeng 43: 505-514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Broad DF, Brown ME, Grant AP and Wood LA (1989) Scale up of mammalian call culture, in Advances in Animal Cell Biology and Technology for Bioprocesses, Spier RE, Griffiths JB, Stephenne J and Crooy PJ (Eds) pp. 412-415.Google Scholar
  22. Byun TG, Zeng AP and Deckwer WD (1994) Reactor comparison and scale-up for the microaerobic production of 2,3-butanediol by enterobacter aerogenes at constant oxygen transfer rate. Bioprocess Engineering 11: 167-175.Google Scholar
  23. Chalmers JJ (1994) Cells and bubbles in sparged bioreactors. Cytotechnology 15: 311-320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chang YHD, Grodzinsky AJ and Wang DIC (1995) Nutrient enrichment and in-situ waste removal through electrical means for hybridoma cultures. Biotech Bioeng 47: 319-326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chang YHD, Grodzinsky AJ and Wang DIC (1995) In situ removal of ammonium and lactate through electrical means for hybridoma cultures. Biotech Bioeng 47: 308-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cherry RS and Papoutsakis ET (1990) Fluid mechanical injury of cells in bioreactors, Chapter 3, In Animal cell biotechnology, Vol 4, Spier RE and Griffiths JB (Eds), pp. 71-121.Google Scholar
  27. Cherry RS (1993) Animal cells in turbulent fluids — details of the physical stimulus and the biological response. Biotech Adv 11(2): 279-299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chisti Y (1993) Animal cell culture in stirred bioreactors: observations on scale up. Bioprocess Engineering 9: 191-196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chisti MY and Moo Young M (1987) Airlift reactors: characteristics, applications and design considerations. Chem Eng Comm 60: 195-424.Google Scholar
  30. Chisti MY, Halard B and Moo-Young M (1988) Liquid circulation in airlift reactors, Chem Eng Sci 43(3): 451-457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Choi PB (1990) Designing airlift loop fermenters. Chem Eng Progress 86: 32.Google Scholar
  32. Chudacek MW (1984) Does your tank bottom have the right shape, Chemical Engineering October 1: 79-83.Google Scholar
  33. Chung IS, Taticek RA and Shuler ML (1993) Production of human alkaline phosphatase, a secreted, glycosylated protein, from a baciulovirus expression system and the attachment-dependent cell line trichoplusia ni bti-tn 5b1-4 using a split flow, air lift bioreactor. Biotechnol Prog 9: 675-678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Clark NN and Flemmer RL (1985) predicting the hold up in two phase bubble upflow and downflow using the Zuber and Findlay drift flux model. AIChE Journal 31(3): 500-503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cooney CL (1995) Are we prepared for animal cell technology in the 21st century? In animal cell technology: developments towards the 21st century, Beuvery EC, Griffiths JB and Zeijlemaker WP (Eds) Kluwer, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  36. Cronin DG and Nienow AW (1989) Mixing studies in a large laboratory proto fermenter: Rushton turbines, Proceedings of the Third NEL Bioreactor Research Symposium Paper No. 1-C, 17-34.Google Scholar
  37. Dorresteijn, de Gooijer, Tramper and Beuvery (1994) A simple dynamic method for on-line and off-line determination of kLa during cultivation of animal cells. Biotech Techniques 8(9): 675-680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fields PR and Slater NKH (1983) Tracer dispersion in a laboratory air lift reactor. Chem Eng Sci 38(4): 647-653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fields PR and Slater NKH (1984) The influence of fluid mixing upon respiratory patterns for extended growth of a methylotroph in an air lift fermenter. Biotech Bioeng 23: 719-726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fleischaker RJ and Sinskey A (1981) Oxygen demand and supply in cell culture. European J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 12: 193-197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Flickinger MC, Goebel NK, Bibila T and Boyc-Jacino S (1992) Evidence of post transcriptional stimulation of monoclonal antibody secretion by L-glutamine during slow hybridoma growth. J Biotechnology 22: 201-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gardner AR, Gainer JL and Kirwan DJ (1990) Effects of stirring and sparging on cultured hybridoma cells. Biotech Bioeng 35(9): 940-947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Geisler RK, Buurman C and Mersmann AB (1993) Scale up of the necessary power input in stirred vessels with suspensions. Chem Eng Journal 51: 29-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Glacken MW, Fleischaker RJ and Sinskey AJ (1983) Mammalian cell culture: engineering principles and scale-up. Trends in Biotechnology 1: 102-108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gray DR, Chen S, Howarth W, Inlow D and Maiorella (1996) CO2 in large scale and high density CHO cell perfusion culture. Cytotechnology 22: 65-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Griffiths JB (1988) Overview of cell culture systems and their scale up, Chapter 7, In Animal cell biotechnology, Vol. 3, Spier RE and Griffiths JB (Eds) Academic Press, London, 179-220Google Scholar
  47. Gunzel B, Yonsel S and Deckwer WD (1991) Fermentative production of 1,3-propanediol from glycerol by Clostridium butyricum up to a scale of 2 M3. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 36: 289-294.Google Scholar
  48. Handa-Corrigan A, Emery AN, Spier RE (1989) Effect of gas-liquid interfaces on growth of suspended mammalian cells: mechanism of cell damage by bubbles. Enzyme and Microbial Technol 11: 230-235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Handa-Corrigan A (1990) Oxygenating animal cell cultures: the remaining problems, Chapter 4, In Animal cell biotechnology Vol. 4, Spier RE and Griffiths JB (Eds) Academic Press, London, pp. 123-132.Google Scholar
  50. Hofmann F, Wrasidlo W, de Winter D and Gallagher S (1989) Fully integrated, compact membrane reactor systems for the large scale production of monoclonal antibodies, In Advances in Animal Cell Biology and Technology for Bioprocesses, Spier RE, Griffiths JB, Stephenne J and Crooy PJ (Eds) pp. 305-310.Google Scholar
  51. Horvarth BE (1989) Mammalian cell culture scale-up: is bigger better? Bio/Technology 7: 468-469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hsu YC and Dudukovic MP, 1980, Gas hold up and liquid recirculation in gas-lift reactors. Chem Eng Sci 35: 135-141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hu WS, Meier J and Wang DIC (1986) Use of surface aerator to improve oxygen transfer in cell culture. Biotech Bioeng 28: 122-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hu W and Peshwa M (1991) Animal cell bioreactors-recent advances and challenges to scale up. Can J Chem Eng 69: 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jem KW (1989) Scale down techniques for fermentation, Pharmaceutical Technology International, May/June, 60-65.Google Scholar
  56. Jobses I, Martens D and Tramper J (1991) Lethal events during gas sparging in animal cell culture. Biotech Bioeng 37(5): 484-490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jones AG (1985) Liquid circulation in a draft tube bubble column. Chem Eng Sci 40(3): 449-462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ju L-K and Chase GG (1992) Improved scale up strategies of bioreactors. Bioprocess Engineering 8: 49-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Junker BH, Hunt G, Burgess B, Aunins J and Buckland BC (1994) Modified microbial fermenter performance in animal cell culture and its implications for flexible fermenter design. Bioprocess Engineering 11: 57-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Katinger HWD, Scheirer W and Kromer E (1979) Bubble column reactor for mass propagation of animal cells in suspension culture. Ger Chem Eng 2: 31-38.Google Scholar
  61. Kawase Y (1995) Design and scale up of external loop airlift bioreactor, In Advances in Bioprocess Engineering, Galindo E and Ramirez OT (Eds) Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 13-19.Google Scholar
  62. Kearns M (1990) Integrated design for mammalian cell culture. Bio/Technology 8: 409-413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Keller J and Dunn IJ (1995) A fluidized bed reactor for cultivation of animal cells, In Advances in Bioprocess Engineering, Galindo E and Ramirez OT (Eds) Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 115-121.Google Scholar
  64. Kioukia N, Nienow AW, Emery AN and Al-Rubeai M (1992) The impact of fluid dynamics on the biological performance of free suspension animal cell culture: Further studies. Trans I Chem E, 70 C 143-148.Google Scholar
  65. Kossen NWF (1995) Scale-up, In Advances in bioprocess engineering, Galindo E and Ramirez OT (Eds) Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 53-65.Google Scholar
  66. Kubota H, Hosono Y and Fujie K (1978) Characteristic evaluations of ICI air lift type deep shaft aerator. J Chem Eng Japan 11(4): 319-325.Google Scholar
  67. Kunas KT and Papoutsakis (1990) Damage mechanisms of suspended animal cells in agitated bioreactors with and without bubble entrainment. Biotech Bioeng 36(5): 476-483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kurano N, Leist C, Messi F, Kurano S and Fiechter A (1990) Growth behaviour of chinese hamster ovary cells in a compact loop bioreactor. 2 Effects of medium components and waste products. J Biotechnology 15: 113-128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lapin A, Paaschen T and Lubbert A (1996) A mechanistic approach to bioreactor fluid dynamics, Fronteras en Biotecnologia Bioingenieria, Sociedad Mexicana de Biotecnologia Bioingeneiria, Galindo E (Ed) pp. 179-196.Google Scholar
  70. Lavery M and Nienow AW (1987) Oxygen transfer in animal cell culture medium. Biotech Bioeng 30: 368-373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Leist CH, Meyer HP and Fiechter A (1990) Potential problems of animal cells in suspension culture. J Biotechnology 15: 1-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Leist C, Meyer HP and Fiechter A (1986) process control during the suspension culture of a human melanoma cell line in a mechanically stirred loop reactor. J Biotechnology 4: 235-246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Leng, DE (1991) Succeed at scale up. Chem Eng Progress 6: 23-31.Google Scholar
  74. Lippert J, Adler I, Meyer HD, Lubbert A and Schugerl K (1983) Characterisation of the two-phase systems in airlift tower-loop bioreactors during cultivation of E-coli. Biotech Bioeng 25: 437-450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lu GZ, Thompson BG, Suresh MR and Gray MR (1995) Cultivation of hybridoma cells in an inclined bioreactor. Biotech Bioeng 45: 176-186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lu WJ, Hwang SJ and Chang CM (1994) Liquid mixing in internal loop airlift reactors. Ind Eng Chem Res 33: 2180-2186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lubbert A, Frolich S, Larson B and Schugerl K (1988) Fluid dynamics in airlift loop bioreactors as measured during real cultivation processes, paper H1, In BHRA 2nd International Conference on Bioreactor Fluid Dynamics, R King (Ed) Elsevier Applied Science, Oxford, pp. 379-393.Google Scholar
  78. Machon V, Pacek AW and Nienow AW (1997) Bubble sizes in electrolyte and alcohol solutions in a turbulent stirred vessel. Trans I Chem E 75A: 339-348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Martin N, Brennen A, Denome L and Shaevitz (1987) High productivity in mammalian cell culture. Bio/Technology 5: 838-840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mayr B, Nagy E, Horvat P and Moser A (1994) Scale up on basis of structured mixing models: a new concept. Biotech Bioeng 43: 195-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Merchuk and Niranjan (1994) Why use bubble column bioreactors. TIBTECH 12: 501-511.Google Scholar
  82. Merchuk JC (1986) Gas hold-up and liquid velocity in a two dimensional air lift reactor. Chem Eng Sci 41(1): 11-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Merchuk JC (1990) Why use air-lift bioreactors? TIBTECH 8: 66-71.Google Scholar
  84. Merchuk JC and Siegel MH (1988) Air-lift reactors in chemical and biological technology. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 41: 105-120.Google Scholar
  85. Merchuk JC and Stein Y (1981a) Local gas hold up and liquid velocity in air lift reactors. AIChEJ 27(3): 377-388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Merchuk JC and Stein Y (1981b) A distributed parameter model for an airlift fermentor, effects of pressure. Biotech Bioeng 23: 1309-1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Michaels J, Mallik AK, Nowak JE, Wasan DT and Papoutsakis ET (1994) Dynamic interfacial tension and rheological properties of cell culture medium with shear protectant additives, In Animal Cell Technology: Products of Today, Prospects for Tomorrow, Spier RE, Griffiths JB and Berthold W (Eds) Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford, pp. 389-391.Google Scholar
  88. Miller WM, Wilkie CR and Blanch HW (1988) Transient responses of hybridoma cells to lactate and ammonia pulse and step changes in continuous culture. Bioprocess Engineering 3: 113-122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Monahan PB and Holtzapple MT (1993) Oxygen transfer in a pulse bioreactor. Biotech Bioeng 42: 724-728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Moo Young and Chisti (1988) Considerations for designing bioreactors for shear sensitive culture. Bio/Technology Nov, 1291-1296.Google Scholar
  91. Moreira JL, Cruz PE, Santana PC and Feliciano AS (1995) Influence of power input and aeration method on mass transfer in a laboratory animal cell culture vessel. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 62: 118-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Nelson KL (1988a) Industrial scale mammalian cell culture part I: bioreactor design considerations. Biopharm Manufact, Feb, 42-46.Google Scholar
  93. Nelson KL (1988b) Industrial scale mammalian cell culture part II: design and scale up. Biopharm Manufact, Feb, 47-55.Google Scholar
  94. Nienow A (1990) Gas dispersion performance in fermenter operation. Chem Eng Prog 86(2): 61-71.Google Scholar
  95. Nienow AW, Warmoeskerken MMCG, Smith JM and Konno M (1985) On the flooding/loading transition and the complete dispersal condition in aerated vessels agitated by a Rushton turbine, 5th European Conference on Mixing, BHRA, Cranfield, 143-154.Google Scholar
  96. Nienow AW, Langheinrich C, Stevenson NC, Emery AN, Clayton TM and Slater NKH (1996) Homogenisation and oxygen transfer rates in large agitated and sparged animal cell bioreactors: Some implications for growth and production. Cytotechnology 22: 87-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Oh SKW, Vig P, Chua F, Teo WK and Yap MGS (1993) Substantial overproduction of antibodies by applying osmotic pressure and sodium butyrate. Biotech Bioeng 42: 601-610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Oh SKW, Chua FKF and Choo ABH (1995) Intracellular responses of productive hybridomas subjected to high osmotic pressure. Biotech Bioeng 46: 525-535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Ohta N, Park YS, Yahiro K and Okabe M (1995) Comparison of neomycin production from streptomyces fradiae cultivation using soybean oil as the sole carbon source in an air lift bioreactor and a stirred tank. J Fermentation Bioengineering 79(5): 443-448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Oosterhuis NMG and Kossen NWF (1984) Dissolved oxygen concentration profiles in a production scale bioreactor. Biotech Bioeng 26: 546-550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Onken U and Weiland P (1983) Airlift fermenters: construction, behaviour and uses. Advances in Biotechnological Processes 1: 67-95.Google Scholar
  102. Orazem ME, Fan LT and Erickson LE (1979) Bubble flow in the downflow section of an airlift tower. Biotech Bioeng 21: 1579-1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Oyaas K, Ellingsen TE, Dyrset N and Levine DW (1994) Utilisation of osmoprotective compounds by hybridoma cells exposed to hyperosmotic stress. Biotech Bioeng 43: 77-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Oyaas K, Berg TM, Bakke O and Levine DW (1989) Hybridoma growth and antibody production under conditions of hyperosmotic stress, In Advances in Animal Cell Biology and Technology for Bioprocesses, Spier RE, Griffiths JB, Stephenne J and Crooy PJ (Eds) Butterworths, Sevenoaks, Kent U.K., pp. 212-220.Google Scholar
  105. Ozturk S and Palsson B (1991) Growth, metabolic and antibody production kinetics of hybridoma cell culture I Analysis of data from controlled batch reactors. Biotechnol Prog 7: 471-480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Ozturk SS, Riley MR and Palsson BO (1992) Effects of ammonia and lactate on hybridoma growth, metabolism and antibody production. Biotech Bioeng 39: 418-431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Ozturk SS and Palsson BO (1991a) Effect of medium osmolarity on hybridoma growth, metabolism and antibody production. Biotech Bioeng 37: 989-993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Ozturk SS and Palsson BO (1991b) Growth, metabolic, and antibody production kinetics of hybridoma cell culture: 1. analysis of data from controlled batch reactors. Biotechnol Prog 7: 471-480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Papoutsakis TE and Kunas KT (1989) Hydrodynamic effects of cultured hybridoma cells CRL 8018 in an agitated bioreactor, In Advances in animal cell biology and technology for bioprocesses, Spier RE, Griffiths JB, Stephenne J and Crooy PJ (Eds) Butterworths, Sevenoaks, Kent, U.K., pp. 203-211.Google Scholar
  110. Papoutsakis ET (1991) Media additives for protecting freely suspended animal cells against agitation and aeration damage. Trends in Biotechnology 9: 316-397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Park SY and Lee GM (1995) Enhancement of monoclonal antibody production by immobilised hybridoma cell culture with hyperosmolar medium. Biotech Bioeng 48: 699-705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Parthasarathy R, Jameson GJ and Ahmed N (1991) Bubble break up in stirred vessels-predicting the Sauter mean diameter. Trans I Chem E 69A: 295-301.Google Scholar
  113. Peshwa MV, Kyung Y-S, McClure DB and Hu W-S (1993) Cultivation of mammalian cells as aggregates in bioreactors: effect of calcium concentration on spatial distribution of viability. Biotech Bioeng 41: 179-187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Phillips AW, Ball GD, Fantes KH, Finter NB and Johnson MD (1985) Experience in the cultivation of mammalian cells on the 8000 L scale, In Large scale mammalian cell culture, Feder J and Tolbert WR (Eds) Academic Press Inc, Orlando, pp. 87-95.Google Scholar
  115. Pullen KF, Johnson MD, Phillips AW, Ball GD and Finter NB (1984) Very large scale suspension cultures of mammalian cells. Develop Biol Standard 60: 175-177.Google Scholar
  116. Ray NG, Rivera R, Gupta R and Mueller D (1997) Large scale production of humanised monoclonal antibody expresses in a GS-NSO cell line, In Animal Cell Technology, MJT Carrondo et al. (Eds) Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 235-241.Google Scholar
  117. Reddy S and Miller WM (1994) Effects of abrupt and gradual osmotic stress on antibody production and content in hybridoma cells that differ in production kinetics. Biotechnol Prog 10: 165-173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Reisman HB (1993) Problems in scale up of biotechnology production processes. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 13(3): 195-253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Reuss M (1995) Stirred tank bioreactors, In Bioreactor system design, Asenjo JA and Merchuk JC (Eds) Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 207-255.Google Scholar
  120. Reuss M (1993) Oxygen transfer and mixing: scale up implications, Chapter 10, In Biotechnology V 3: Bioprocessing, Stephanopoulos G (Ed) VCH, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 186-217.Google Scholar
  121. Reuveny S and Lazar A (1989) Equipment and procedures for production of monoclonal antibodies in culture. In Monoclonal antibodies and applications Vol 11, Liss AR (Ed) pp. 45-80.Google Scholar
  122. Rice JW, Rankl NB, Gurganus TM, Marr CM, Barna JB, Walters, MM and Burns DJ (1993) A comparison of large scale Sf9 insect cell growth and protein production: stirred vessel vs airlift. BioTechniques 15(6): 1052-1059.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Royce PNC and Thornhill NF (1991) Estimation of dissolved carbon dioxide concentrations in aerobic fermentations. AICh EJ 37(11): 1680-1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Russell AB, Thomas CR and Lilly MD (1994) The influence of vessel height and top section size on the hydrodynamics characteristics of air lift fermenters. Biotech Bioeng 43: 69-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Russell AB, Thomas CR and Lilly MD (1995) Oxygen transfer measurements during yeast fermentations in a pilot scale airlift fermenter. Bioprocess Engineering 12: 71-79.Google Scholar
  126. Schlaeger EJ and Schumpp B (1989) Studies on mammalian cell growth in suspension culture, In Advances in Animal Cell Biology and Technology for Bioprocesses, Spier RE, Griffiths JB, Stephenne J and Crooy PJ (Eds) Butterworths, Sevenoaks, Kent, U.K., pp. 386-396.Google Scholar
  127. Schugerl K and Lubbert A (1995) Pneumatically driven bioreactors, In Bioreactor system design, Asenjo JA and Merchuk JC (Eds) Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 257-303.Google Scholar
  128. Siegel MH and Robinson CW (1992) Applications of airlift gas-liquid solid reactors in biotechnology. Chem Eng Sci 47(13/14): 3215-3229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Shin CS, Kim SY and Ju JY (1994) Characteristics of sisomicin fermentation supplemented with MgSO4 in stirred and air lift fermenters. Biotechnology Letters 16(3): 251-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Smart NJ (1984) Gas lift fermenters: theory and practice, Laboratory Practice, July, 9–14.Google Scholar
  131. Smith JM and Davison SW (1990) Development of a strategy to control the dissolved concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide at constant shear in a plant cell bioreactor. Biotech Bioeng 35: 1088-1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Sola C and Godia F (1995) Scale up, In Bioreactor system design, Asenjo JA and Merchuk JC (Eds) Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 511-552.Google Scholar
  133. Stejskal J and Potucek F (1985) Oxygen transfer in liquids. Biotech Bioeng 27: 503-508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Sucker HG, Jordan M, Eppenberger HM and Widmer F (1994) Bubble bed reactor: a reactor design to minimise the damage of bubble aeration on animal cells. Biotech Bioeng 44: 1246-1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Takagi M, Ohara K-I and Yoshida T (1995) Effect of hydrostatic pressure on hybridoma cell metabolism. J Fermentation and Bioengineering 80(6): 619-621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Tokashiki M and Takamatsu H (1993) Perfusion culture apparatus for suspended mammalian cells. Cytotechnology 13: 149-159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Tolbert WR, Lewis C, White PJ and Feder J (1985) Perfusion culture systems for production of mammalian cell biomolecules, In Large scale mammalian cell culture, Feder J and Tolbert WR (Eds) Academic Press Inc, Orlando, pp. 97-119.Google Scholar
  138. Tramper J, Smit D, Straatman J and Vlak JM (1987) Bubble column design for growth of fragile insect cells. Bioprocess Engineering 2: 37-41.Google Scholar
  139. Tramper J, de Gooijer KD and Vlak JM (1993) Scale up considerations and bioreactor development for animal cell cultivation. Insect Cell Culture Engineering: Bioprocess Technology 17: 139-177.Google Scholar
  140. Tramper J (1995) Oxygen gradients in animal cell bioreactors, In animal cell technology: developments towards the 21st century, Beuvery EC, Griffiths JB and Zeijlemaker WP (Eds) Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 883-891.Google Scholar
  141. Trinh K, Garciabriones M, Hink F and Chalmers JJ (1994) Quantification of damage to suspended insect cells as a result of bubble rupture. Biotech Bioeng 43(1): 37-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Van Brunt J (1988) How big is big enough. Bio/Technology 6(5): 480-485.Google Scholar
  143. Van der Pol LA, Beeksma I and Tramper J (1995) Polyethylene glycol as protectant against damage caused by sparging for hybridoma suspension cells in a bubble column. Enzyme Microb Technol 17: 401-407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Van der Pol L, Bakker WAM and Tramper J (1992) Effect of low serum concentrations on growth, production and shear sensitivity of hybridoma cells. Biotech Bioeng 40(1): 179-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Van der Pol L, Bonarius D, Vandewouw G and Tramper J (1993) Effect of silicone antifoam on shear sensitivity of hybridoma cells in sparged cultures. Biotech Progress 9(5): 504-509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Verlaan P, Tramper J and Van't Riet (1986) A hydrodynamic model for an airlift loop bioreactor with external loop. Chem Eng Journal 33: B43-B53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Verlaan P, Tramper J, van't Riet K and Luyben KChAM (1986) Hydrodynamics and axial dispersion in an air lift loop bioreactor with two and three phase flow. Proc International Conf on Bioreactor Fluid Dynamics BHRA Fluid Engineering, paper 7: 93-107.Google Scholar
  148. Verlaan P, Van Ejis AMM, Tramper J, van't Riet K and Luyben KChAM (1989) Estimation of axial dispersion in individual sections of an airlift loop reactor. Chem Eng Sci 44(5): 1139-1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Verlaan P, Vos JC and van't Riet K (1988) From bubble column to air lift loop reactor: hydrodynamics and axial dispersion of the transition flow regime, paper F1, In BHRA 2nd International Conference on Bioreactor Fluid Dynamics, R King (Ed) Elsevier Applied Science, Oxford, pp. 259-275.Google Scholar
  150. Voncken RM, Holmes DB and Den Hartog HW (1964) Fluid flow in turbine stirred, baffled tanks II: dispersion during circulation. Chem Eng Sci 19: 209-213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Votruba J and Sobotka M (1992) Physiological similarity and bioreactor scale up. Folia Microbiol 37(5): 331-345.Google Scholar
  152. Wang Y-D and Mann R (1992) Partial segregation in stirred batch reactors. Trans IChemE 70A: 283-290.Google Scholar
  153. Wayte J, Boraston R, Bland H, Varley J and Brown M (1997) pH: Effects on growth and productivity of cell lines producing monoclonal antibodies: control in large scale fermenters. The Genetic Engineer and Biotechnologist 17(2–3): 125-132.Google Scholar
  154. Werner RG (1994) Potential and efficiency in the biotechnical process, Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, May, pp. 20-28.Google Scholar
  155. Werner R, Walz F, Noe W and Konrad A (1992) Safety and economic aspects of continuous mammalian cell culture. J Biotechnol 22: 51-68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Whitton M (1988) Power and mass transfer studies in a tall vessel equipped with three impellers, paper D1 BHRA 2nd International Conference on Bioreactor Fluid Dynamics, King R (Ed) Elsevier Applied Science, Oxford, pp. 135-158.Google Scholar
  157. Wu W-T and Jong J-Z (1994) Liquid phase dispersion in an airlift reactor with a net draft tube. Bioprocess Eng 11: 43-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Yang JD and Wang NS (1992) Cell inactivation in the presence of sparging and mechanical agitation. Biotech Bioeng 40(7): 806-816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Zhang S, Handa-Corrigan A and Spier RE (1992) Oxygen transfer properties of bubbles in animal cell culture media. Biotech Bioeng 40: 252-259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Zhang, Al-Rubeai and Thomas (1993) Comparison of fragility of several animal cell lines. Biotech Techniques 7(3): 177-182.Google Scholar
  161. Zhang ZB and Thomas CR (1993) Micromanipulation — a new approach to studying animal cell damage in bioreactors. The Genetic Engineer and Biotechnologist 13(1): 19-29.Google Scholar
  162. Zhou W, Bibila T, Glazonitsky K, Montalvo J, Chan C, Di Stefano D, Munshi S, Robinson D, Buckland B and Aunins J (1996) Large scale production of recombinant mouse and rat growth hormone by fed-batch GS-NSO cell cultures. Cytotechnology 22: 239-250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Varley
    • 1
  • J. Birch
    • 2
  1. 1.Biotechnology and Biochemical Engineering GroupReading UniversityReadingUK
  2. 2.LONZA BiologicsSloughUK

Personalised recommendations