Small Business Economics

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 21–31

The Exploration of Technological Diversity and Geographic Localization in Innovation: Start-Up Firms in the Semiconductor Industry

  • Paul Almeida
  • Bruce Kogut


This paper examines the innovative ability of small firms in the semiconductor industry regarding their exploration of technological diversity and their integration within local knowledge networks. Through the analysis of patent data, we compare the innovative activity of start-up firms and larger firms. We find that small firms explore new technological areas by innovating in less ‘crowded’ areas. The analysis of patent citation data reveals that small firms are tied into regional knowledge networks to a greater extent than large firms. These findings point to the role of entrepreneurial firms in the exploration of new technological spaces and in the diffusion of their accumulated knowledge through local small firm networks.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acs, Zoltan and David Audretsch, 1990, Innovation and Small firms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Albert, M. B., D. Avery, F. Narin and P. McAllister, 1991, ‘Direct Validation of Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents’, Research Policy 20, 251–259.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, Robert, 1983, ‘Collective Invention’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4, 1–24.Google Scholar
  4. Almeida, Paul, 1996, ‘Learning and Contributing: Patent Citation Analysis of Foreign Multinationals in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry’, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
  5. Almeida, Paul and Bruce Kogut, 1995, ‘Technology and Geography: The Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Patent Holders’, Working Paper, The Huntsman Center for Global Competition and Innovation, The Wharton School, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  6. Bound, J. C., C. Cummins, Z. Griliches, B. H. Hall and A. Jaffe, 1984, ‘Who Does R&D and Who Patents’, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity, Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Braun, Ernest and Stuart MacDonald, 1982, Revolution in Miniature, 2nd edn., New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carpenter, Mark, Francis Narin and Patricia Woolf, 1981, ‘Citation Rates to Technologically Important Patents’, World Patent Information 3(4), 160–163.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, W. and S. Klepper, 1996, ‘The Trade-off Between Firm Size and Diversity in the Pursuit of Technological Progress’, Small Business Economics 4(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, Wes and Richard Levin, 1989, ‘Innovation and Market Structure’, in Richard Schmalensee and Robert Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  11. Dataquest, 1990, A Decade of Semiconductor Start-ups, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Down, A., 1967, Inside Bureaucracy, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  13. Eisenhardt, K. M. and C. B. Schoonhoven, 1990, ‘Organizational Growth: Founding Teams Strategy and Environment and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures 1978–1988’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35(3), 504–529.Google Scholar
  14. Feldman, Maryann, 1994, ‘Knowledge Complimentarity and Innovation’, Small Business Economics 6(5), 363–372.Google Scholar
  15. Hannan, Michael and John Freeman, 1984, ‘Structural Inertia and Organizational Change’, American Sociological Review 49, 149–164.Google Scholar
  16. Henderson, R., 1993, ‘Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry’, RAND Journal of Economics 24(2), 248–270.Google Scholar
  17. Herrigel Gary, 1993, ‘Large Firms, Small Firms, and the Governance of Flexible Specialization: The Case of Baden Wuttemberg and Socialized Risk’, in Bruce Kogut (ed.), Country Competitiveness, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg and R. Henderson, 1993, ‘Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3), 577–598.Google Scholar
  19. Jewkes, J., D. Sawers and R. Stillerman, 1958, The Sources of Invention, London, U.K.: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kogut, Bruce, Gordon Walker, Weijian Shan and Dong-Jae Kim, 1993, ‘Platform Technologies and National Industrial Networks’, in John Hagedoorn (ed.), Internationalization of Corporate Technology Strategy.Google Scholar
  21. Kogut, Bruce and Dong-Jae Kim, 1996, ‘Diversification and Platform Technologies’, Organization Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  22. Moore, Gordon E., 1986, ‘Entrepreneurship and Innovation: The Electronics Industry’, The Positive Sum Strategy, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Narin, F., E. Noma and R. Perry, 1987, ‘Patents as Indicators of Technological Strength’, Research Policy 16, 143–155.Google Scholar
  24. Nooteboom, Bart, 1994, ‘Innovation and Diffusion in Small Firms: Theory and Evidence’, Small Business Economics 6(5), 327–348.Google Scholar
  25. Pavitt, K., 1984, ‘Sectoral Patterns of ethnological Change’, Research Policy 13, 343–373.Google Scholar
  26. Piore, M. and C. Sabel, 1984, The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Rogers, Everett 1982, ‘Information Exchange and Technological Innovation’, in D. Sahal (ed.), The Transfer and Utilization of Technical Knowledge, Boston, Massachusetts: Lexington Books, pp. 105–123.Google Scholar
  28. Rogers, Everett and Judith Larson, 1984, Silicon Valley Fever, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Saxenian, AnnaLee, 1991, ‘The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley’, Research Policy 20, 423–437.Google Scholar
  30. Saxenian, AnnaLee, 1994, Regional Advantage, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Scherer, F. M., 1984, Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Scherer, F. M. and D. Ross, 1990, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  33. Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, Theory of Economic Development, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schumpeter, J. A., 1943, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London, UK: Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. Trajtenberg, Manuel, 1990, ‘A Penny for Your Quotes’, Rand Journal of Economics 21(1), 172–187.Google Scholar
  36. U.S. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office, 1992, Technology Profile Report: Semiconductors, Washington DC.NY: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Almeida
    • 1
  • Bruce Kogut
    • 2
  1. 1.School of BusinessGeorgetown UniversityWashington DC
  2. 2.The Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations