Natural Hazards

, Volume 15, Issue 2–3, pp 105–119 | Cite as

Seismic Hazard Studies in the U.K.: Source Specification Problems of Intraplate Seismicity

  • R. M. W. Musson


Although the U.K. is in an area of only low to moderate seismicity, the seismic hazard is sufficient to pose a threat to sensitive structures such as chemical plants and nuclear facilities. In quantifying the level of hazard by conventional probabilistic methodology, however, some problems arise in attempting to interpret earthquake data in terms of geological structure and faults. In the U.K., not only is it impossible to identify any demonstrably active faults, but also it is extremely difficult to discern any relationship between the pattern of seismicity and local or regional geological structure.

This study discusses the use of two zonation approaches which complement each other in such a way that the general character and trend of seismicity is preserved. In one approach, the zonation is informed by the structural geology, where possible; geological zonation is avoided if it produces sources with heterogeneous seismicity. In the other approach, the record of past earthquakes is divided up into very small zones around individual epicentres or groups of epicentres, the size of each zone usually being proportional to the uncertainty in the epicentral determination of the appropriate event. This zonation preserves an observed tendency of some British earthquakes to repeat themselves. It is suggested that, in intraplate areas such as the U.K., it is often inappropriate to attempt to model individual fault sources. No faults in the U.K. are provably active. Because an earthquake of moderate size can occur on a very short fault segment, it is impractical to restrict fault modelling to major features. Even the two largest U.K. faults, suspected to be active, pose problems in attributing historical seismicity to them as distinct features.

seismic hazard intraplate source models faults 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chadwick, R.A., Pharaoh, T.C., Williamson, J.P., and Musson, R.M.W.: 1996, Seismotectonics of the U.K., BGS Technical Report No. WA/96/3C.Google Scholar
  2. Coppersmith, K.J. and Youngs, R.R.: 1986, Capturing uncertainty in probabilistic seismic hazard assessments within intraplate tectonic environments, Proc. Third U.S. Nat. Conf. Eq. Eng, Charleston, 1, 301-312.Google Scholar
  3. Davenport, C.A., Ringrose, P.S., Becker, A., and Fenton, C.: 1989, Geological investigations of late and post glacial earthquake activity in Scotland, in: S. Gregerson and P. Basham (eds.), Earthquakes at North-Atlantic Passive Margins: Neotectonics and Postglacial Rebound, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Vordingborg, Denmark, 9-13 May 1988, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Davison, C.: 1924, A History of British Earthquakes, CUP, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Frankel, A.D., Perkins, D., Barnhard, T.P., and Mueller, C.S.: 1995, New Methodology for the USGS Seismic Hazard Maps, IUGG XXI General Assembly, Boulder 2-14 July 1995, Abstracts, p B343.Google Scholar
  6. Gardner, J.K. and Knopoff, L.: 1974, Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 64, 1363-1367.Google Scholar
  7. Horne, J. and Hinxman, L.W.: 1914, The Geology of the Country Round Beauly and Inverness, Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland, sheet 83, HMSO, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  8. Jacob, K., Armbruster, J., Barstow, N., and Horton, S.: 1994, Probabilistic Ground Motion Estimates for New York: Comparison with Design Ground Motions in National and Local Codes, Proc. Fifth U.S. Nat. Conf. on Eq. Eng., Chicago, 10-14 July 1994, pp. 119-128.Google Scholar
  9. Johnston, A.C.: 1989, The seismicity of stable continental interiors, in S. Gregerson and P. Basham (eds.), Earthquakes at North-Atlantic Passive Margins: Neotectonics and Postglacial Rebound, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Vordingborg, Denmark, 9-13 May 1988, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, pp. 299-328.Google Scholar
  10. Johnstone, G.S. and Mykura, W.: 1989, The Northern Highlands of Scotland, BGS Regional Geology Series, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  11. Muir Wood, R.: 1993, Ice Sheet Loading/Unloading and Sector Zoning Seismotectonics, Terra Abstracts, No. 5, suppl. 5, p. 11.Google Scholar
  12. Musson, R M. W.: 1989, Seismicity of Cornwall and Devon, BGS Global Seismology Report No. WL/89/11.Google Scholar
  13. Musson, R.M.W.: 1993, Comrie: a historical Scottish earthquake swarm and its place in the history of seismology, Terra Nova 5, 477-480.Google Scholar
  14. Musson, R.M.W.: 1994, A Catalogue of British Earthquakes, BGS Global Seismology Report No. WL/94/04.Google Scholar
  15. Musson, R.M.W.: 1996, The seismicity of the British Isles, Annali di Geofisica 39(3), 463-469.Google Scholar
  16. Musson, R.M.W., Neilson, G., and Burton, P.W.: 1984,Macroseismic Reports on Historical British Earthquakes VII: North Scotland, BGS Global Seismology Report No. 232.Google Scholar
  17. Musson, R.M.W., Neilson, G., and Burton, P.W.: 1986,Macroseismic Reports on Historical British Earthquakes X: The Great Glen, BGS Global Seismology Report No. 347.Google Scholar
  18. Musson, R.M.W. and Winter, P.W.: 1993, Seismic Hazard Methodology for a Hazard Map of the U.K., AEA Tech. Cons. Serv. Report No. GNSR(DTI)P(93)149.Google Scholar
  19. Musson, R.M.W. and Winter, P.W.: 1995, Seismic Hazard of the U.K., AEA Technology Report No. AEA/CS/16422000/ZJ745/005.Google Scholar
  20. Musson, R.M.W. and Winter, P. W.: 1996/7, Seismic hazard maps of the U.K., Natural Hazards 14(2-3), 141-154.Google Scholar
  21. Redmayne, D.W. and Musson, R.M.W.: 1987, The Dunoon Earthquake of 16 September 1985, BGS Global Seismology Report No 311.Google Scholar
  22. Woo, G.: 1996, Kernel estimation methods for seismic hazard area source modelling, BSSA 86(2), 353-362.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. W. Musson
    • 1
  1. 1.British Geological SurveyMurchison HouseEdinburghScotland, U.K

Personalised recommendations