Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 65–78 | Cite as

Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers

  • Salim Abu-Rabia
Article

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of Arabic vowels and Arabic context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers reading narrative stories and newspaper articles. Central to this study is the belief that reading theory today should consider additional variables, especially when explaining the reading process in Arabic orthography among poor and skilled readers. This orthography has not been studied: reading theory today is the sum of conclusions from studies conducted in Latin orthography. The subjects were 109 tenth-grade native Arabic speakers, 39 of them poor readers and 70 skilled readers. Subjects had to read Arabic narrative stories and newspaper articles. There were four reading conditions for each text type: vowelized text, unvowelized text, vowelized word naming, and unvowelized word naming. The results showed that vowels and contexts were important variables to facilitate word recognition in poor and skilled readers in Arabic orthography. A new Arabic reading model for skilled readers is suggested.

Arabic orthography Vowels Interactive-dynamic reading Skilled readers Poor readers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abu-Rabia, S. & Siegel, L.S. (1995). Different orthographies, different context effects: The effects of Arabic sentence context on skilled and poor readers, Reading Psychology 16: 1–19.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Balota, D.A. & Chumbley, J.I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10: 340–357.Google Scholar
  4. Bentin, S. & Frost, R. (1987). Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography, Memory & Cognition 25: 13–23.Google Scholar
  5. Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia, Developmental Psychology 26: 439–454.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, H.C. (1987). Character detection in reading Chinese: Effect of context display format, Chinese Journal of Psychology 29: 45–50.Google Scholar
  7. Frost, R. & Bentin, S. (1992). Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity: Evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18: 58–68.Google Scholar
  8. Frost, R., Katz, R. & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13: 104–111.Google Scholar
  9. Heywood, J.A. & Nahmad, H.M. (1965). The Arabic language: A new Arabic grammar of the written language. London: Percy Lund, Humphries & Co.Google Scholar
  10. Jobran, K. (1964). The writings of Jobran. Beirut: Dar-Alnasher.Google Scholar
  11. Just, M.A. & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Atheory of reading: Fromeye-fixations to comprehension, Psychological Review 4: 329–354.Google Scholar
  12. Just, M.A. & Carpenter, P.A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. Koriat, A. (1984). Reading without vowels: Lexical access in Hebrew. In: H. Bouma & D.G. Bouwhuis (eds.), Attention and performance: Control of language processes (pp. 227–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Koriat, A. (1985). Lexical access for low and high frequency words in Hebrew, Memory & Cognition 13: 378–44.Google Scholar
  15. Navon, D. & Shimron, J. (1981). Does word naming involve grapheme-to-phoneme translation? Evidence from Hebrew, Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 20: 97–109.Google Scholar
  16. Navon, D. & Shimron, J. (1984). Reading Hebrew: How necessary is graphemic representation of vowels? In: L. Henderson (ed.), Orthographies and reading (pp. 91–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K. & Balota, D.A. (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading, Perception and Psychophysics 40: 123–130.Google Scholar
  19. Ryan, A. & Meara, P. (1991). The case of the invisible vowels: Arabic speakers reading English words, Reading in a Foreign Language 7: 531–541.Google Scholar
  20. Schwantes, P.M. (1985). Expectancy, integration, and interactional processes: Age differences in the nature of words affected by sentence context, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39: 212–229.Google Scholar
  21. Seidenberg, M.S. & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming, Psychological Review 96: 523–568.Google Scholar
  22. Shimron, J. (1993). The role of vowels in reading: A review of studies of English and Hebrew, Psychological Bulletin 114: 52–67.Google Scholar
  23. Shimron, J. & Sivan, T. (1994). Reading proficiency and orthography: Evidence from Hebrew and English, Language Learning 44: 5–27.Google Scholar
  24. Simpon, G.B. & Foster, M.R. (1986). Lexical ambiguity and children's word recognition, Developmental Psychology 22: 147–154.Google Scholar
  25. Stanovich, K.E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency, Reading Research Quarterly 16: 32–71.Google Scholar
  26. Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequence of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy, Reading Research Quarterly 4: 360–407.Google Scholar
  27. Stanovich, K.E. (1992). The psychology of reading: Evolutionary and revolutionary developments, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 12: 13–30.Google Scholar
  28. Stanovich, K.E. & Feeman, D.J. (1981). A longitudinal study of sentence context effects in second-grade children: Tests of an interactive-compensatory model, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 32: 185–199.Google Scholar
  29. Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F. & Stone, G.O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics, Psychological Review 97: 488–522.Google Scholar
  30. West, R.F. & Stanovich, K.E. (1978). Automatic contextual facilitation in readers of three ages, Child Development 49: 717–727.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salim Abu-Rabia
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of HaifaMount CarmelIsrael

Personalised recommendations