Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 5–20 | Cite as

Do Daily Price Limits Act as Magnets? The Case of Treasury Bond Futures

  • Marcelle Arak
  • Richard E Cook
Article

Abstract

This article examines price behavior in the U.S. Treasury bond futures market in the mornings after large overnight price moves, using data from 1980 to 1987. The article tests whether price behavior is affected by proximity to a price limit, and whether the effect is a magnet effect or a calming effect. In that period, the price tends to reverse direction after the morning open, and the reversal appears to reflect a calming effect of the price being close to the limit. An alternative hypothesis—that morning price behavior reflects the overnight price change rather than proximity to the price limit per se—is also tested, and does not perform as well in explaining price behavior.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackert, Lucy, and William Hunter. “Tests of a Simple Optimizing Model of Daily Price Limits on Futures Contracts.” Center for the Study of Futures Markets Working Paper No. 193, October 1989.Google Scholar
  2. Brady Commission (Presidential Task Force on Market Mechanisms). “Report of the Presidential Task Force on Market Mechanisms,” 1988.Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, Michael J. “A Theory of Price Limits in Futures Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics 16(2) (1986), 213-233.Google Scholar
  4. Brock, William A., and Allan W. Kleidon. “Periodic Market Closure and Trading Volume: A Model of Intraday Bids and Asks.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 16(3/4) (1992), 451-489.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, Keith C., W. V. Harlow, and Seha M. Tinic. “Risk Aversion, Uncertain Information, and Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics 22(2) (1988), 355-385.Google Scholar
  6. Coursey, Donald L., and Edward A. Dyl. “Price Limits, Trading Suspension and the Adjustment of Prices to New Information.” Review of Futures Markets 9(2) (1990), 342-361.Google Scholar
  7. Ferguson, Robert. “What to Do, or Not Do, about the Markets.” Journal of Portfolio Management 14(4) (1988), 14-19.Google Scholar
  8. Gay, Gerald D., Jayant R. Kale, Robert W. Kolb, and Thomas H. Noe. “(Micro) Fads in Asset Prices: Evidence from the Futures Market.” Journal of Futures Markets, vol. 14 (1994).Google Scholar
  9. Gerety, Mason S., and J. Harold Mulherin. “Trading Halts and Market Activity: An Analysis of Volume at the Open and the Close.” SEC Division of Economic Analysis Research Report, May 1990.Google Scholar
  10. Isaac, R. C., and C. R. Plott. “Price Controls and the Behavior of Auction Markets: An Experimental Examination.” American Economic Review 71(3) (June 1981), 448-459.Google Scholar
  11. Kuserk, Gregory J., Eugene Moriarty, Betsey Kuhn, and J. Douglas Gordon. “An Analysis of the Effect of Price Limits on Price Movements in Selected Commodity Futures Markets.” CFTC Division of Economic Analysis Research Report, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. Ma, Christopher, William H. Dare, and Darla R. Donaldson. “Testing Rationality in Futures Markets.” Journal of Futures Markets 10(2) (1990), 137-152.Google Scholar
  13. Ma, Christopher, Ramesh Rao, and R. Stephen Sears. “Limit Moves and Price Resolution: The Case of the Treasury Bond Futures.” Journal of Futures Markets 9(4) (1989), 321-336.Google Scholar
  14. Ma, Christopher, Ramesh Rao, and R. Stephen Sears. “Volatility, Price Resolution, and the Effectiveness of Price Limits.” Journal of Financial Services Research 3(2/3) (1989), 165-199.Google Scholar
  15. Shleifer, Andrei, and Lawrence H. Summers. “The Noise Trader Approach to Finance.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(2) (Spring 1990), 19-34.Google Scholar
  16. Spiegel, Matthew, and Avindhar Subrahmanyam. “A Theory of 'News Pending' Trading Suspensions.” Unpublished working paper, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcelle Arak
    • 1
  • Richard E Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ColoradoDenver

Personalised recommendations