Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 227–227

A land-use and water-quality history of White Rock Lake reservoir, Dallas, Texas, based on paleolimnological analyses

  • J. Platt Bradbury
  • Peter C. Van Metre
Article

Abstract

White Rock Lake reservoir in Dallas, Texas contains a 150-cm sediment record of silty clay that documents land-use changes since its construction in 1912. Pollen analysis corroborates historical evidence that between 1912 and 1950 the watershed was primarily agricultural. Land disturbance by plowing coupled with strong and variable spring precipitation caused large amounts of sediment to enter the lake during this period. Diatoms were not preserved at this time probably because of low productivity compared to diatom dissolution by warm, alkaline water prior to burial in the sediments. After 1956, the watershed became progressively urbanized. Erosion decreased, land stabilized, and pollen of riparian trees increased as the lake water became somewhat less turbid. By 1986 the sediment record indicates that diatom productivity had increased beyond rates of diatom destruction. Neither increased nutrients nor reduced pesticides can account for increased diatom productivity, but grain size studies imply that before 1986 diatoms were light limited by high levels of turbidity. This study documents how reservoirs may relate to land-use practices and how watershed management could extend reservoir life and improve water quality.

diatoms pollen sediment reservoir limnology land-use change Texas 

References

  1. Battarbee, R. W., 1973. A new method for the estimation of absolute microfossil numbers, with reference especially to diatoms. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18: 647–653.Google Scholar
  2. Boyle, T. P., 1984. The effect of environmental contaminants on aquatic algae. In E. L. Shubert (ed.), Algae as ecological indicators. Academic Press, London: 237–256.Google Scholar
  3. Brugam, R. B. & B. J. Speziale, 1983. Human disturbance and the paleolimnological record of change in the zooplankton community of Lake Harriet, Minnesota. Ecology 64: 578–591.Google Scholar
  4. Cole, G. A., 1963. The American southwest and middle America. In D.G. Frey (ed.), Limnology in North America. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison: 393–434.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, R. B., 1990. The scope of Quaternary Paleolimnology. In R.B. Davis, (ed.), Paleolimnology and the Reconstruction of Ancient Environments. Boston, Massachusetts, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland, p. 1–24.Google Scholar
  6. Faegri, K. & J. Iversen, 1964. Textbook of pollen analysis. Hafner, New York: 237 p.Google Scholar
  7. Gasse, F., J. F. Talling, & P. Kilham, 1983. Diatom assemblages in East Africa. Revue d’ Hydrobiol. trop. 16: 3–34.Google Scholar
  8. Grubaugh J. W. & B. J. Wallace, 1995. Functional structure and production of the benthic community in a Piedmont river: 1956–1957 and 1991–1992. Limnol. Oceanogr. 40: 490–501.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, B. B. & J. K. G. Silvey, 1940. Limnological investigation on Texas reservoir lakes. Ecol. Monogr. 10: 111–143.Google Scholar
  10. Kilham, S. S. & P. Kilham, 1978. Natural community bioassays: predictions of results based on nutrient physiology and competition. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 20: 68–74.Google Scholar
  11. Kilham, P., S. S. Kilham, & R. E. Hecky, 1986. Hypothesized resource relationships among African planktonic diatoms. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31: 1169–1181.Google Scholar
  12. Kimmel, B. L., O. T. Lind, & L. J. Paulson, 1990. Reservoir primary productivity. In K. W. Thornton, B. L. Kimmel, & F. E. Payne (eds), Reservoir Limnology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York: 246 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Krammer K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1986–1991. Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa: Band 2 Bacillariophyceae. Teil 1–4. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  14. Lawson, D. S., D. C. Hurd, & H. S. Pankratz, 1978. Silica dissolution rates of decomposing phytoplankton assemblages at various temperatures. Am. J. Sci. 278: 1373–1393.Google Scholar
  15. Marshall, R. M. & C. B. Brown, 1939. Erosion and related landuse conditions on the watershed of White Rock Reservoir near Dallas, Texas. U.S. Dept. Agriculture: 29 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Marzolf G. R. & J. A. Osborne, 1971. Primary production in a Great Plains reservoir. Verh. Ver. Int. Limnol. 18: 126–133.Google Scholar
  17. Osborne, J.A., 1972. The application of a photosynthetic model for turbid reservoirs: a field investigation: Ph.D. Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.Google Scholar
  18. Patrick, R., J. Cairns, Jr., & S. S. Roback, 1967. An ecosystematic study of the fauna and flora of the Savannah River. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 118: 109–407.Google Scholar
  19. Patterson, M., 1942. A study of the seasonal distribution of plankton in White Rock Lake. Trans. Tex. Acad. Sci. 25: 72–75.Google Scholar
  20. Pennington, W., R. S. Cambray, & E. M. Fisher, 1973. Observations on lake sediments using fallout 137Cs as a tracer. Nature 242: 324–326.Google Scholar
  21. Schleske, C. L., 1985. Biogeochemical silica mass balances in Lake Michigan and Lake Superior. Biogeochem. 1: 197–218.Google Scholar
  22. Simola, H., 1984. Population dynamics of plankton diatoms in a 69-year sequence of annually laminated sediment. Oikos 43: 30–40.Google Scholar
  23. Tolonen, M., 1978. Paleoecology of annually laminated sediments in Lake Ahvenainen, S. Finland III. human influence in the lake development. Ann. Bot. Fen. 15: 223–240.Google Scholar
  24. Van Metre, P. C. & E. Callender, 1997. Water-quality trends in White Rock Creek Basin from 1912–1994 identified using sediment cores from White Rock Lake reservoir, Dallas, Texas. J. Paleolim. 17: 239–249.Google Scholar
  25. Zodin, R.H., G. G. Smith, & W. D. Baker, 1971. Report of sedimentation resurvey White Rock Lake, Dallas, Texas. U.S. Dept. Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Temple, Texas, 14 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Platt Bradbury
    • 1
  • Peter C. Van Metre
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyDenverUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations