Water Resources Management

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 20–50 | Cite as

A Review on Monthly Water Balance Models for Water Resources Investigations

  • C.-Y. Xu
  • V. P. Singh


Research on the development and application of monthly water balance models has been carried out since the 1940s. A good body of experience has been gained for many models, and a review of these models is needed. Beginning with the development of monthly water balance models from the earliest times, this paper discusses the relevance of various aspects of the practical application of such models. Monthly water balance models were introduced originally to evaluate the importance of different hydrologic parameters under a variety of hydrologic conditions. Present applications of water balance models are directed along three main lines: reconstruction of the hydrology of catchments, assessment of climatic impact changes, and evaluation of the seasonal and geographical patterns of water supply and irrigation demand.

monthly water balance models review water resources investigation climatic impact assessment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, M. B., Bathurst, J. C., Cunge, J.A., O’Connell, P. E. and Rasmussen, J.: 1986, An introduction to the European Hydrological System - Système Hydrologique Européen, ‘sHE’, 1: History and philosophy of physically-based, distributed modeling system, J. Hydrol. 87, 45-59.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, M. B., Bathurst, J. C., Cunge, J.A., O’Connell, P. E. and Rasmussen, J.: 1986, An introduction to the European Hydrological System - Système Hydrologique Européen, ‘sHE’, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modeling system, J. Hydrol. 87, 61-77.Google Scholar
  3. Alley, W. M.: 1984, On the treatment of evapotranspiration, soil moisture accounting and aquifer recharge in monthly water balance models, Water Resour. Res. 20(8), 1137-1149.Google Scholar
  4. Alley, W. M.: 1985, Water balance models in one-month-ahead stream flow forecasting Water Resour. Res. 21(4), 597-606.Google Scholar
  5. Arnall, N. W.: 1992, Factors controlling the effects of climate change on river flow regimes in a humid temperate environment, J. Hydrol, 132, 321-342.Google Scholar
  6. Beven, K. J.: 1989, Changing ideas in hydrology - the case of physically-based models, J. Hydrol. 105, 157-172.Google Scholar
  7. Boughton, W. C.: 1973, A mathematical catchment model for estimating runoff, J. Hydrol. 7(3), 75-100.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, R. T.: 1973, A review of some mathematical models used in hydrology with observation on their calibration and use, J. Hydrol. 19(1), 1-20.Google Scholar
  9. Dooge, J. C. I.: 1977, Problems and methods of rainfall-runoff modelling, in: Ciriani, T. A., Maione, U. and Wallis, J. R. (eds.), Mathematical Models for Surface Water Hydrology, Wiley, New York, pp. 71-108.Google Scholar
  10. Dyck, S.: 1983, Overview on the present status of the concepts of water balance models, in: Van der Beken, A. and Herrmann, A. (eds.), New Approaches in Water Balance Computations(Proceedings of the Hamburg Workshop), IAHS Publ. No. 148, pp. 3-19.Google Scholar
  11. Edijatno, and Michel, C.: 1989, Un modele pluie-debit journalier à trois parameteres, Houille Balanche 2, 113-121.Google Scholar
  12. Fiering, M. B.: 1967, Streamflow Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. Gabos, A. and Gasparri, L.: 1983, Monthly runoff model for regional planning, Water Internat. 8, 42-45.Google Scholar
  14. Gleik, P. H.: 1986, Methods for evaluating the regional hydrologic inpacts of global climatic changes, J. Hydrol. 88, 97-116.Google Scholar
  15. Gleick, P. H.: 1987, The development and testing of a water balance model for climate impact assessment: modelling the Sacramento basin, Water Resour. Res. 23(6), 1049-1061.Google Scholar
  16. Gray, D. M. and O’Neill, A. D. J.: 1974, Application of the energy budget for predicting snowmelt runoff, in: Henry S. Santeford and James L. Smith (eds.), Advanced Concepts and Techniques in the Study of Snow and Ice Resources, National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  17. Haan, C. T.: 1972, A water yield model for small watersheds, Water Resour. Res. 8(1), 28-69.Google Scholar
  18. Halldin, S.(ed.): 1979, Comparison of forest water and energy exchange models, Development in Agriculture and Managed-Forest Ecology, Vol. 9, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. Hughes, D. A.: 1982, Conceptual catchment model parameter transfer studies using monthly data from the Southern Cape Coastal lakes Region, Report 1/82, Hydrological Research Unit, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  20. Hughes, D. A.: 1989, Estimation of the parameters of an isolated event conceptual model from physical catchment characteristics, Hydrol. Sci. J. 34(5), 539-557.Google Scholar
  21. Jarboe, J. E. and Haan, C. T.: 1974, Calibration of a water yield model for small ungauged watersheds, Water Resour. Res. 10(2), 256-262.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, J. R.: 1976, Physical data for catchment models, Nordic Hydrol. 7, 245-264.Google Scholar
  23. Krzysztofowicz, R. and Diskin, M. H.: 1978, A moisture-accounting watershed model for single-storm events based on time-area concept, J. Hydrol. 37, 261-294.Google Scholar
  24. Kuczera, G.: 1982, On the relationship between the reliability of parameter estimates and hydrologic time series data used in calibration, Water Resour. Res. 18(1), 146-154.Google Scholar
  25. Kuczera, G.: 1983a, Improved parameter inference in catchment models, 1. Evaluating parameter uncertainty, Water Resour. Res. 19(5), 1151-1162.Google Scholar
  26. Kuczera, G.: 1983b, Improved parameter inference in catchment models, 2, Combining different kinds of hydrologic data and testing their compatibility, Water Resour. Res. 19(5), 1163-1172.Google Scholar
  27. Lang, H.: 1984, Forecasting meltwater runoff from snow-covered areas and from glacier basins, in: J. R. Moll (ed.), Real-Time River Flow Forecasting, Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen, The Netherlands, Report 6, pp. 113-146.Google Scholar
  28. Langford, K. J., Duncan, H. P. and Heeps, D. P.: 1978, Forecasting streamflow and storage using a soil dryness index model. Rep. MMBWW-0031, Melbourne and Metrop. Board of Works, Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
  29. Leavesley, G. H.: 1989, Problems of snowmelt runoff modelling for a variety of physiographic and climatic conditions, Hydrol. Sci. J. 34(6), 617-634.Google Scholar
  30. Linsley, R. K.: 1967, The relation between rainfall and runoff, J. Hydrol. 5, 297-371.Google Scholar
  31. Magette, W. L., Shanholtz, V. O. and Carr, J. C.: 1976, Estimating selected parameters for the Kentucky Watershed Model from watershed characteristics, Water Resour. Res. 12(3), 462-476.Google Scholar
  32. Makhlouf, Z. and Michel, C.: 1994, A two-parameter monthly water balance model for French watersheds, J. Hydrol. 162, 299-318.Google Scholar
  33. Martinec, J. and Rango, A.: 1986, Parameter values for snowmelt runoff modelling, J. Hydrol. 84, 197-219.Google Scholar
  34. Monteith, J. L.: 1965, Evaporation and environment, in: G. E. Fogg (ed.), The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms(Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, Number XIX), The Company of Biologist, Cambridge, pp. 205-234.Google Scholar
  35. Moussavi, M.: 1988, Hydrologic systems modelling of mountainous watersheds in semi-arid regions. PhD Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  36. Moussavi, M., Wyseure, G. and Feyne, J.: 1989, Estimation of melt rate in seasonally snow-covered mountainous areas, Hydrol. Sci. J. 34(3), 249-263.Google Scholar
  37. Moussavi, M., Wyseure, G. and Feyne, J.: 1990, Comparison of different structures for a monthly water yield model in seasonally snow-covered mountainous watersheds of Iran, Hydrol. Sci. J. 35(5), 535-546.Google Scholar
  38. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J.: 1970, River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10, 282-290.Google Scholar
  39. Oliver, H. R.: 1983, The availability of evaporation data in space and time for use in water balance computations, in: Van der Beken, A. and A. Herrmann, (eds.), New Approaches in Water Balance Computations (Proceedings of the Hamburg Workshop), IAHS Publ. No. 148.Google Scholar
  40. Palmer, W. C.: 1965, Meteorologic drought Research Paper, US Weather Bureau, 45, p. 58Google Scholar
  41. Pilgrim, D. H.: 1975, Model evaluation, testing and parameter estimation in hydrology, in: T. G. Chapman and F. X. Dunin (eds.), Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, pp. 305-333.Google Scholar
  42. Pitman, W. V.: 1973, A mathematical model for generating monthly river flows from meteorological data in South Africa. Report 2/73, Hydrological Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  43. Pitman, W. V.: 1978, Flow generation by catchment models of differing complexity - a comparison of performance, J. Hydrol. 38, 59-70.Google Scholar
  44. Power, J. M.: 1986, Canada case study: water supply, in: G. Young (ed.), Techniques for Prediction of Runoff from Glacierized Areas, IAHS Publ. No. 149.Google Scholar
  45. Rainbird, A. F.: 1976, Methods of estimating areal average precipitation. WMO/IHD Report No. 3.Google Scholar
  46. Roberts, P. J. T.: 1978, A comparison of the performance of selected conceptual models of the rainfall-runoff process in semi-arid catchments near Grahamstown, Report 1/78, Hydrological Research Unit, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  47. Roberts, P. J. T.: 1979, Model FLEXIFIT: A conceptual rainfall-runoff model for the extension of monthly runoff records. Dept. of Environment Affairs, Hydrological Research Institute, Tech. Report TR98.Google Scholar
  48. Salas, J. D., Tabios III, G. Q. and Obeysekera, J. T. B.: 1986, Seasonal model for watershed simulation, Users Manual, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University.Google Scholar
  49. Schaake, J. C. and Liu, C.: 1989, Development and application of simple water balance models to understand the relationship between climate and water resources, in: M. L. Kavvas (ed.), New Directions for Surface Water Modeling(Proceedings of the Baltimore Symposium, May 1989), IAHS Publ. No. 181.Google Scholar
  50. Servat, E. and Dezette, A.: 1993, Rainfall-runoff modelling and water resources assessment in northwestern Ivory Coast. Tentative extension to ungauged catchments, J. Hydrol. 148, 231-248.Google Scholar
  51. Singh, V. P.: 1989, Hydrologic System, Vol. 2. Watershed Modelling, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  52. Singh, V. P.: 1995, Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado.Google Scholar
  53. Snyder, F. F.: 1963, A water yield model derived from monthly runoff data. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication No. 63, pp. 18-30.Google Scholar
  54. Soorooshian, S. and Dracup, J. A.: 1980, Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologic rainfall-runoff models: correlated and heteroscedastic error cases, Water Resour. Res. 16(2), 430-442.Google Scholar
  55. Thomas, H. A.: 1981, Improved method for national water assessment, Report WR15249270, U.S. Water Resource Council, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  56. Thornthwaite, C.W.: 1948, An approach toward a rational classification of climate, Geogr. Rev. 38(1), 55-94.Google Scholar
  57. Thornthwaite, C. W. and Mather, J. R.: 1955, The water balance, Publ. Climatol. Lab. Climatol. Dresel Inst. Technol. 8(8), 1-104.Google Scholar
  58. Thornthwaite, C. W. and Mather, J. R.: 1957, Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance, Publ. Climatol. Lab. Climatol. Dresel Inst. Technol 10(3), 185-311.Google Scholar
  59. Tuffuor, S. and Labadie, J. W.: 1973, A nonlinear time variant rainfall-runoff model for augmenting monthly data, Water Resour. Res. 19(6), 1161-1166.Google Scholar
  60. U. S. Army of Corps of Engineers: 1956, Snow hydrology. Summary report of the snow investigation, North Pacific Division, Portland.Google Scholar
  61. Van der Beken, A. and Byloos, J.: 1977, A monthly water balance model including deep infiltration and canal losses, Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 22(3), 341-351.Google Scholar
  62. Vandewiele, G. L. and Elias, A.: 1995, Monthly water balance of ungauged catchments obtained by geographical regionalization, J. Hydrol. 170, 277-291.Google Scholar
  63. Vandewiele, G. L. and Ni-Lar-Win: 1993, Monthly water and snow balance models on basin scale, in: K. Banasik and A. Zbikowski (eds.), Runoff and Sediment Yield Modelling, Warsaw, pp. 83-88.Google Scholar
  64. Vandewiele, G. L., Xu, C.-Y. and Huybrechts, W.: 1991, Regionalisation of physically-based water balance models in Belgium: application to ungauged catchments, Water Resour. Manage. 5, 199-208.Google Scholar
  65. Vandewiele, G. L., Xu, C.-Y. and Ni-Lar-Win: 1992, Methodology and comparative study of monthly water balance models in Belgium, China and Burma, J. Hydrol. 134, 315-347.Google Scholar
  66. Woo, M. K.: 1972, A numerical simulation model for snow storage in small coastal basins, Southern British Columbia, IAHS Publ. No. 107, 2, pp. 992-1014.Google Scholar
  67. Xu, C.-Y.: 1992, Monthly water balance models in different climatic regions. PhD thesis, V.U.B. Hydrologie-22, 219 pp. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.Google Scholar
  68. Xu, C.-Y.: 1996, Methodology of statistical analysis of rainfall-runoff models (submitted to Nordic Hydrol.).Google Scholar
  69. Xu, C.-Y. and Halldin, S.: 1996, The effect of climate change in river flow and snow cover in the NOPEX area simulated by a simple water balance model, Proc. of Nordic Hydrological Conference, Alkureyri, Iceland, Vol. 1 pp. 436-445.Google Scholar
  70. Xu, C.-Y. and Vandewiele, G. L.: 1992, Reliability of calibration of a conceptual water balance model: the humid case, in: T. F., Russell, R. E. Ewing, C. A. Brebbia, W. G. Gray, and G. F. Pinder, (eds.), Proceedings of the IX International Conference on Computation Methods in Water Resources, Denver, Colorado, pp. 773-780.Google Scholar
  71. Xu, C.-Y. and Vandewiele, G. L.: 1994, Sensitivity of monthly rainfall-runoff models to input errors and data length, Hydrol. Sci. J. 39(2), 157-176.Google Scholar
  72. Xu, C.-Y. and Vandewiele, G. L.: 1995, Parsimonious monthly rainfall-runoff models for humid basins with different input requirements, Adv. Water Resour. 18, 39-48.Google Scholar
  73. Xu, C.-Y., Seibert, J. and Halldin, S.: 1996a, Regional water balance modelling in the NOPEX area - development and application of monthly water balance models, J. Hydrol. 180, 211-236.Google Scholar
  74. Xu, C.-Y., Seibert, J. and Halldin, S.: 1996b, Regional water balance modelling in the NOPEX area - test on parameter estimations using catchment characteristics (Submitted to J. Hydrol.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • C.-Y. Xu
    • 1
  • V. P. Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.Hydrology DivisionUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringLouisiana State University, Baton RougeLouisianaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations