Foundations of Physics Letters

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 221–233

THE PROBLEM OF CONSCIOUS OBSERVATION IN QUANTUM MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION

  • H. D. Zeh
Article

Abstract

Epistemological consequences of quantum nonlocality (entanglement) are discussed under the assumption of a universally valid Schrödinger equation and the absence of hidden variables. This leads inevitably to a many-minds interpretation. The recent foundation of quasi-classical neuronal states in the brain (based on environmental decoherence) permits in principle a formal description of the whole chain of measurement interactions, including the behavior of a conscious observer, without introducing any intermediate classical concepts (for macroscopic “pointer states”) or “observables” (for microscopic particle positions and the like)—thus consistently formalizing Einstein's ganzer langer Weg from the observed to the observer in quantum mechanical terms.

entanglement quantum measurement Everett interpretation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantentheorie (Berlin, 1932).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys. 1, 69 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scient. Amer. 242,Nos. 5 and 8 (1980).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys. 9, 803 (1979).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    See, e.g., J. M. Davidson and R. J. Davidson, eds., The Psychobiology of Consciousness (Plenum, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Pribram, Ref. [6], p. 61.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Vaihinger, Die Philosophie des Als Ob (Berlin, 1911).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Pauli's letters to M. Born, in M. Born, Briefwechsel zwischen A. Einstein und M. Born (Nymphenburger, München, 1969).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. D. Zeh, Epist. Lett. No. 49.0 (1980).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Everett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ph. Pearle, Phys. Rev. D 13, 857 (1976).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Wigner, in L. J. Good, ed., The Scientist Speculates (Heinemann, London, 1962).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952). J. S. Bell, Epist. Lett. No. 37.0 (1978); also published in C. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. Sciama, eds., Quantum Gravity 2 (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1981). H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys. Lett. 12, 197 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. D. Zeh, in B. d'Espagnat, ed., Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Enrico Fermi School of Physics IL) (Academic, New York 1972).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys. 3, 109 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer, J. Kupsch, I.-O. Stamatescu, and H. D. Zeh, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1996).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Albert and B. Loewer, Synthese 77, 195 (1988).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Lockwood, Mind, Brain and the Quantum: The Compound 'I' (Blackwell, Oxford, 1989); Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 47, 159 (1996).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. J. Donald, Found. Phys. 22, 1111 (1992); 25, 529 (1995).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Stapp, in P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds., Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991); Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics (Springer, Berlin, 1993).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. J. Chalmers, The Conscious Mind (Oxford University Press, New York, 1996); see also L. Vaidman, e-print quant-ph/0001057.MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Whitaker, in Ph. Blanchard, D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer, I. O. Stamatescu, eds., Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems (Springer, Berlin, 2000).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Squires, Eur. J. Phys. 8, 171 (1987); Conscious Mind in the Physical World (Hilger, Bristol, 1990).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. N. Page, e-print quant-ph/9506010.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Tegmark, Phys. Rev. E 61, 4194 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Beller, Quantum Dialogue (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999).MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    H. D. Zeh, The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time, 3rd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 1999); see also www.time-direction.deCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    F. London and E. Bauer, La théorie d'observation en mécanique quantique (Hermann, Paris, 1939).MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. Penrose, Shadows of the Mind (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    W. Heisenberg, Der Teil und das Canze (Piper, München, 1971).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. C. Ghirardi, Phys. Lett. A 262, 1 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Arndt et al., Nature 401, 680 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. R. Damasio, The Feeling of What Happens (Harcourt & Brace, New York, 1999).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. D. Zeh
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Theoretische PhysikUniversität HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations