Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 613–625

Visual and Chemical Cues Used in Host Location and Acceptance by a Dipteran Parasitoid

  • Shellee A. Morehead
  • Donald H. FeenerJr.
Article

Abstract

Locating potential hosts for egg laying is a critical challenge in the life history of many insects. Female insects in several orders have evolved mechanisms to find hosts by using olfactory and visual signals derived from their hosts. We describe visual and chemical cues used by the dipteran parasitoid Apocephalus paraponerae (Diptera: Phoridae) in the location and acceptance of its host ant Paraponera clavata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Our results show that A. paraponerae uses the visual cue of ant body size when locating hosts at short range and that these flies lay more eggs in ants that retain their surface chemicals than in ants with these chemicals removed. We compare the cues used by A. paraponerae with cues used by tephritid fruit flies in location and acceptance of their hosts, and we suggest further avenues for the study of host location, acceptance, and host discrimination of A. paraponerae and other parasitoids of ants.

Paraponera clavata Apocephalus Phoridae dipteran parasitoids host acceptance host location 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Aldrich, J. R., Oliver, J. E., Lusby, W. R., Kochansky, J.P., and Lockwood, J. A. (1987). Pheromone strains of the cosmopolitan pest, Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J.Exp. Zool. 244: 171-175.Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich, J. R., Hoffmann, M. P., Kochansky, J. P., Lusby, W. R., Eger, J. E., and Payne, J. A. (1991). Identification and attractiveness of a major pheromone component for Nearctic Euschistus spp stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Environ. Entomol. 20: 477-483.Google Scholar
  3. Aluja, M., and Prokopy, R. J. (1992). Host search behavior by Rhagoletis pomonella flies: Intertree movement patterns in response to wind-borne fruit volatiles under field conditions. Physiol. Entomol. 17: 1-8.Google Scholar
  4. Aluja, M., and Prokopy, R. J. (1993). Host odor and visual stimulus interaction during intratree host finding behavior of Rhagoletis pomonella flies. J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 2671-2696.Google Scholar
  5. Arthur, A. P. (1981). Host acceptance by parasitoids. In Nordlund, D. A., Jones, R. L., and Lewis, W. J. (eds.). Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 97-120.Google Scholar
  6. Askew, R. R. (1971). Parasitic Insects, American Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Averill, A. L., and Prokopy, R. J. (1988). Factors influencing release of host marking pheromone by Rhagoletis pomonella flies. J. Chem. Ecol. 14: 95-111.Google Scholar
  8. Beehler, J. W., Millar, J. G., and Mulla, M. S. (1993). Synergism between chemical attractants and visual cues influencing oviposition of the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 635-644.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, B. V., and Feener, D. H., Jr. (1991a). Behavior and host location cues of Apocephalus paraponerae (Diptera: Phoridae), a parasitoid of the giant tropical ant Paraponera clavata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biotropica 23: 182-187.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, B. V., and Feener, D. H., Jr. (1991b). Life history parameters and description of the larvae of Apocephalus paraponerae (Diptera: Phoridae), a parasitoid of the gaint tropical ant Paraponera clavata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Nat. Hist. 25: 221-231.Google Scholar
  11. Cade, W. (1975). Acoustically orienting parasitoids: Fly phonotaxis to cricket song. Science 190: 1312-1313.Google Scholar
  12. Carlson, D. A., and Service, M. W. (1980). Identification of mosquitos of Anopheles gambiae species complex A and B by the analysis of cuticular components. Science 207: 1089-1091.Google Scholar
  13. Diehl, S., and Prokopy, R. J. (1986). Host-selection behavior differences between the fruit fly sibling species Rhagoletis pomonella and R. mendax (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79: 266-271.Google Scholar
  14. Feener, D. H., Jr., and Brown, B. V. (1997). Diptera as parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42: 73-97.Google Scholar
  15. Feener, D. H., Jr., Jacobs, L. F., and Schmidt, J. O. (1996). Specialized parasitoid attracted to a pheromone of ants. Anim. Behav. 51: 61-66.Google Scholar
  16. Godfray, H. C. J. (1994). Parasitoids, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  17. Hermann, H. R., Blum, M. S., Wheeler, J. W., Overal, W. L., Schmidt, J. O., and Chao, J.-T. (1984). Comparative anatomy and chemistry of thevenomapparatus and mandibular glands in Dinoponera grandis (Guerin) and Paraponera clavata (F.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77: 272-279.Google Scholar
  18. Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1990). The Ants, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Howard, R. W., and Blomquist, G. J. (1982). Chemical ecology and biochemistry of insect hydrocarbons. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27: 149-172.Google Scholar
  20. Monteith, L. G. (1956). Influence of host movement on selection of hosts by Drino bohemica Mesn. as determined by an olfactometer. Can. Entomol. 88: 853-856.Google Scholar
  21. Owens, E. D., and Prokopy, R. J. (1986). Relationship between reflectance spectra of host plant surfaces and visual detection of host fruit by Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Physiol. Entomol. 11: 297-308.Google Scholar
  22. Prokopy, R. J. (1972). Response of apple maggot flies to rectangles of different colors and shades. Environ. Entomol. 1: 720-726.Google Scholar
  23. Prokopy, R. J., and Bush, G. L. (1973). Ovipositional responses to different sizes of artificial fruit by flies of the Rhagoletis pomonella species group. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 66: 927-929.Google Scholar
  24. Prokopy, R. J., Moericke, V., and Bush, G. L. (1973). Attraction of apple maggot flies to odor of apples. Environ. Entomol. 2: 743-749.Google Scholar
  25. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry, W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  26. van Alphen, J. J. M., and Vet, L. E. M. (1986). An evolutionary approach to host finding and selection. In Waage, J., and Greathead, D. (eds.). Insect Parasitoids, Academic Press, London, pp. 23-61.Google Scholar
  27. Vander Meer, R. K., and Wojcik, D. P. (1982). Chemical mimicry in the myrmecophilous beetle Myrmecaphodius excavaticollis. Science 218: 806-808.Google Scholar
  28. van Lenteren, J. C. (1981). Host discrimination by parasitoids. In Nordlund, D. A., Jones, R. L., and Lewis, W. J. (eds.), Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 153-179.Google Scholar
  29. Vinson, S. B. (1981). Habitat location. In Norlund, D. A., Jones, R. L., and Lewis, W. J. (eds.), Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 51-77.Google Scholar
  30. Vinson, S. B. (1984). How parasitoids locate their hosts: A case of insect espionage. In Lewis, T. (ed.), Insect Communication, Royal Entomological Society of London, London, pp. 325-348.Google Scholar
  31. Walker, T. J. (1993). Phonotaxis in female Ormia ochracea (Diptera: Tachinidae), a parasitoid of field crickets. J. Insect Behav. 6: 389-410.Google Scholar
  32. Waloff, N., and Jervis, M. A. (1987). Communities of parasitoids associated with leaf hoppers and plant hoppers in Europe. Adv. Ecol. Res. 17: 281-376.Google Scholar
  33. Winston, M. L. (1992). Semiochemicals and insect sociality. In Roitberg, B.D., and Isman, M. B. (eds.), Insect Chemical Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 315-333.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shellee A. Morehead
    • 1
  • Donald H. FeenerJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations