Advertisement

Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Firm Survival in the Netherlands

  • David B. Audretsch
  • Patrick Houweling
  • A. Roy Thurik
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the dynamics of industrial organization differ in the Netherlands from what has emerged as a Stylized Fact in other countries. Because the Netherlands has pursued a unique set of institutions and policies comprising what has become known as the Polder Model, the factors leading to firm failure may systematically differ from those in other countries. We address this question using a longitudinal database from Statistics Netherlands (CBS) that identifies over two thousand firms in manufacturing and then tracks their performance over time.

Exit manufacturing industries survival 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrighetti, A. (1994) 'Entry, Growth and Survival of Manufacturing Firms', Small Business Economics, 6, 127–137.Google Scholar
  2. Audretsch, D. B. (1991) 'New-Firm Survival and the Technological Regime', Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 441–450.Google Scholar
  3. Audretsch, D. B. (1995) Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. B., and T. Mahmood (1995) 'New-Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function', Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 97–103.Google Scholar
  5. Audretsch, D. B., and J. Mata (1995) 'The Post-Entry Performance of Firms: Introduction', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14, 413–419.Google Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B., B. Menkveld, and A.R. Thurik (1996) 'The Decision between Internal and External R&D', Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152, 510–530.Google Scholar
  7. Bais, J., and F. W. van Uxem (1996) Groei van het Aantal Bedrijfsvestigingen in Nederland 1994. Zoetermeer: EIM Small Business and Consultancy.Google Scholar
  8. Baldwin, J. R., and P. K. Gorecki (1991) 'FirmEntry and Exit in the Canadian Manufacturing Sector', Canadian Journal of Economics, 24, 300–323.Google Scholar
  9. Caves, R. E., and M. E. Porter (1976) 'Barriers to Exit', in R. T. Masson and P. D. Qualls, eds., Essays on Industrial Organization in Honor of Joe S. Bain. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  10. Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts, and L. Samuelson (1988) 'Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries', Rand Journal of Economics, 104, 671–698.Google Scholar
  11. Geroski, P. A. (1995) 'What Do We Know about Entry?', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 421–440.Google Scholar
  12. Hannan, M. T., and J. Freeman (1989) Organizational Ecology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hauw, P. A. van der, A. F. M. Nijssen, and C. J. van Uitert (1996) Werken en Werkgelegenheid in het MKB. Zoetermeer: EIM Small Business and Consultancy.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobson, Louis (1985) Analysis of the Accuracy of SBA's Small Business Database. Alexandria, VA: Center of Naval Analysis.Google Scholar
  15. Jensen, M. C. (1986) 'The Agency Costs of Free Cash Flows, Corporate Finance and Takeovers', American Economic Review, 75, 234–256.Google Scholar
  16. Jovanovic, B. (1982) 'Selection and Evolution in Industry', Econometrica, 50, 649–670.Google Scholar
  17. Kleinknecht, A. (1998) 'Is Labour Market Performance Harmful to Innovation?', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22, 387–396.Google Scholar
  18. Lind van Wijngaarden, K. I. de (1996) The State of Small Business in the Netherlands. Zoetermeer: EIM Small Business and Consultancy.Google Scholar
  19. MacDonald, James (1985) 'Dun & Bradstreet Business Microdata: Research Applications, and the Detection and Correction of Errors', Journal of Economic and SocialMeasurement, 13, 173–185.Google Scholar
  20. Mansfield E. (1962) 'Entry, Gibrat's Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms', American Economic Review, 52, 1023–1051.Google Scholar
  21. Mata, J. (1994) 'Firm Growth During Infancy', Small Business Economics, 6, 27–39.Google Scholar
  22. McKinsey Global Institute (1997) Boosting Dutch Economic Performance. Amsterdam: McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
  23. Nooteboom, B. (1994) 'Innovation and Diffusion in Small Firms: Theory and Evidence', Small Business Economics, 6, 327–347.Google Scholar
  24. Scherer, F. M. (1973) 'The Determinants of Plant Size in Six Nations', Review of Statistics and Economics, 55, 135–145.Google Scholar
  25. Wagner, J. (1994) 'The Post-Entry Performance of New Small Firms in German Manufacturing Industries', Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 141–154.Google Scholar
  26. Weiss, L. W. (1976) 'Optimal Plant Scale and the Extent of Suboptimal Capacity', in R. T. Masson and P. D. Qualls, eds., Essays on Industrial Organization in Honor of Joe S. Bain. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  27. Weiss, L. W. (1979) 'The Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm and Antitrust: the Goals of Competitive Policy', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127, 1104–1140.Google Scholar
  28. Weiss, L.W. (1991) in D. B. Audretsch and H. Yamawaki, eds., Structure, Conduct and Performance. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wennekers, S. (1997) 'The Revival of Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands', Paper presented at The EIIW Conference on Business Start-Ups and SME Policy in Europe, Potsdam 13–14 March.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David B. Audretsch
    • 1
  • Patrick Houweling
    • 2
  • A. Roy Thurik
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Economic Policy Research Tinbergen, InstituteErasmus UniversityRotterdamthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for Advanced Small Business Economics (CASBEC)Erasmus UniversityRotterdamthe Netherlands
  3. 3.Centre for Advanced Small Business EconomicsErasmus UniversityRotterdamthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations