Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 26, Issue 1–2, pp 5–11 | Cite as

Organizational Issues in University-Industry Technology Transfer: An Overview of the Symposium Issue

  • Donald S. Siegel
  • Jerry G. Thursby
  • Marie C. Thursby
  • Arvids A. Ziedonis
Article

Keywords

Economic Growth Technology Transfer Industrial Organization Technology Management Organizational Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association of University Technology Managers AUTM, 1997, The AUTM Licensing Survey, Fiscal Year 1996.Google Scholar
  2. Feller, I., 1990a, 'University Patent and Licensing Strategies', Educational Policy 4, 327-340.Google Scholar
  3. Feller, I., 1990b, 'Universities as Engines of R & D-Based Economic Growth: They Think They Can', Research Policy 19, 335-348.Google Scholar
  4. Hall, B., A.N. Link, and J.T. Scott, 2000, 'Universities as Research Partners', NBER Working Paper #7643, April 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Jensen, R. and M.C. Thursby, 1998, 'Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Tale of University Licensing', NBER Working Paper No. 6698, August 1998 and forthcoming, American Economic Review.Google Scholar
  6. Link, A.N. and J.T. Scott, 1998, Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based Institutions, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson, B. Sampat, and A.A. Ziedonis, 1999, 'The Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on U.S. University Research and Technology Transfer: An Analysis of Data from Columbia University, the University of California, and Stanford University', forthcoming, Research Policy.Google Scholar
  8. Mowery, D.C. and A.A. Ziedonis, 1999, 'The Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on U.S. University Research and Technology Transfer: Analyzing Data from Entrants and Incumbents', forthcoming, Research Policy.Google Scholar
  9. Nelson, R.R., 2000, 'Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole Rise of Patenting at American Universities', forthcoming, Journal of Technology Transfer.Google Scholar
  10. Siegel, D., D. Waldman, and A.N. Link, 1999, 'Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study', NBER Working Paper #7256, July 1999.Google Scholar
  11. Siegel, D., D. Waldman, L. Atwater, and A.N. Link, 2000, 'Transferring Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from University Technology Transfer Offices', mimeo, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  12. Thursby, J.G. and S. Kemp, 1999, 'Growth and Productive Efficiency of University Intellectual Property Licensing', mimeo, Purdue University.Google Scholar
  13. Thursby, J.G. and M.C. Thursby, 2000, 'Who is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing', NBER Working Paper #7718, May 2000.Google Scholar
  14. Wessner, C.W. ed., 1999, The Advanced Technology Program: Challenges and Opportunities, National Academy Press: Norwell, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald S. Siegel
    • 1
  • Jerry G. Thursby
    • 2
  • Marie C. Thursby
    • 2
  • Arvids A. Ziedonis
    • 3
  1. 1.Business SchoolUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Department of Economics, Krannert School of ManagementPurdue UniversityWest Lafayette
  3. 3.Department of Management, The Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations