Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 129–147 | Cite as

Investigating the Consistency of Mate-Locating Behavior in the Territorial Butterfly Hypolimnas bolina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

  • Darrell J. Kemp


The study of butterfly behavior has afforded valuable insights into the evolution of alternative mating tactics. Two hypotheses derived from this area of research contend that (1) territoriality is only viable under low to moderate conspecific densities (due to the costs of site defence) and (2) perching may be employed only when thermal conditions constrain flight activity. These hypotheses were evaluated by investigating mate locating behavior in Hypolimnas bolina, a territorial species that is naturally subject to variation in population density and weather conditions. Male behavior was charted throughout the day during a period of high population density at an encounter site in tropical Australia. Perching was the primary tactic, although a small proportion of individuals patrolled nonaggressively in the afternoon. Population-level male behavior failed to support predictions drawn from either the “territory economics” or “thermal constraint” hypotheses. First, the proportion of perching males and the number of aggressive conspecific interactions (per male) increased with increasing male density at the site. Second, few males patrolled at the hottest, brightest time of day (approximately midday), and the diel distribution of perchers did not emulate the “U-shaped” distribution shown by the occurrence of dorsal basking behavior. These results show that perching in this species is not a suboptimal tactic employed when temperatures constrain flight activity but may represent the best method of locating receptive females. At this stage the reproductive significance of the observed patrolling behavior remains obscure.

alternative mating tactics sexual selection intrasexual competition behavioral plasticity reproductive behavior perching 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcock, J. (1985). Hilltopping in the nymphalid butterfly Chlosyne californica (Lepidoptera). Am. Midl. Nat. 113: 69–75.Google Scholar
  2. Alcock, J. (1994). Alternative mate-locating tactics in Chlosyne californica (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Ethology 97: 103–118.Google Scholar
  3. Alcock, J. (1997). Competition from large males and the alternative mating tactics of small males of Dawson's burrowing bee (Amegilla dawsoni) (Apidae, Apinae, Anthophorini). J. Insect Behav. 10: 99–113.Google Scholar
  4. Alcock, J., and Houston, T. F. (1987). Resource defense and alternative mating tactics in the banksia bee, Hylaeus alcyoneus (Erichson). Ethology 76: 177–188.Google Scholar
  5. Alcock, J., and O'Neill, K. M. (1986). Density-dependent mating tactics in the grey hairstreak, Strymon melinus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J. Zool. 209: 105–113.Google Scholar
  6. Alcock, J., and O'Neil, K. M. (1987). Territory preferences and intensity of competition in the grey hairstreak Strymon melinus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and the tarantula hawk wasp Hemipepsis ustulata (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 118: 128–138.Google Scholar
  7. Arak, A. (1984). Sneaky breeders. In Barnard, C. J. (ed.), Producers and Scroungers, Croom Helm, London, pp. 154–194.Google Scholar
  8. Austad, S. (1984). Alternative reproductive behaviors: The maintenance of behavioral variability. Am. Zool. 24: 309–319.Google Scholar
  9. Austad, S. N., Jones, W. T., and Waser, P. M. (1979). Territorial defence in speckled wood butterflies: Why does the resident always win? Anim. Behav. 27: 960–961.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, C., and Sheppard, P. M. (1975). The genetics of the mimetic butterfly Hypolimnas bolina. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 229–265.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, J. M., Compton, S. G., Herre, E. A., and West, S. A. (1997). Alternative mating tactics and extreme male dimorphism in fig wasps. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 747–754.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, N. B. (1978). Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria: The resident always wins. Anim. Behav. 26: 138–147.Google Scholar
  13. Dawkins, R. (1980). Good strategy of evolutionarily stable strategy? In: Barlow, G. W., and Silverberg, J. (eds.), Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture? Westview Press, Boulder, Co, pp. 331–367.Google Scholar
  14. Dennis, R.L.H. (1982). Mate locations strategies in the wall brown butterfly Lasiommata megera (L.) (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): Wait or seek? Entomol. Rec. J. Var. 94: 209–214.Google Scholar
  15. Dennis, R. L. H. (1987). Hilltopping as a mate location strategy in a Mediterranean population of Lasiommata megera (L.) (Lep. Satyridae). Nota Lepid. 10: 65–70.Google Scholar
  16. Dennis, R. L. H., and Shreeve, T. G. (1988). Hostplant-habitat structure and the evolution of butterfly mate-locating behaviour. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 94: 301–318.Google Scholar
  17. Dominey, W. J. (1984). Alternative mating tactics and evolutionarily stable strategies. Am. Zool. 24: 385–396.Google Scholar
  18. Emlen, D. J. (1997). Alternative reproductive tactics and male-dimorphism in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 335–341.Google Scholar
  19. Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.Google Scholar
  20. Greeff, J. M. (1998). Local mate competition, sperm usage and alternative mating strategies. Evol. Ecol. 12: 627–628.Google Scholar
  21. Gross, M. R. (1991). Evolution of alternative reproductive strategies: Frequency-dependent sexual selection in male bluegill sunfish. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 332: 59–66.Google Scholar
  22. Gross, M. R. (1996). Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: Diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 92–98.Google Scholar
  23. Hazel, W. N., Smock, R., and Johnson, M. D. (1990). A polygenic model for the evolution and maintenance of conditional strategies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242: 181–187.Google Scholar
  24. Hernández, M. I. M., and Benson, W. W. (1998). Small-male advantage in the territorial tropical butterfly Heliconius sara (Nymphalidae): A paradoxical strategy? Anim. Behav. 56: 533–540.Google Scholar
  25. Higashi, K., and Nomakuchi, S. (1997). Alternative mating tactics and aggressive male interactions in Mnais nawai Yamamoto (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 26: 159–169.Google Scholar
  26. Kemp, D. J. (1998). Oviposition behaviour of post-diapause Hypolimnas bolina (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in tropical Australia. Aust. J. Zool. 46: 451–459.Google Scholar
  27. Kemp, D. J. (2001). Reproductive seasonality in the tropical butterfly Hypolimnas bolina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in northern Australia (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  28. Kemp, D. J. (2000). Contest behaviour in territorial male butterflies: Does size matter? Behav. Ecol. 11: 591–596.Google Scholar
  29. Kemp, D. J., and Rutowski, R. L. (2001). Spatio-temporal patterns of mate-locating behaviour in Hypolimnas bolina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Nat. Hist. (in press).Google Scholar
  30. Lederhouse, R. C. (1982). Territorial defense and lek behavior of the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10: 109–118.Google Scholar
  31. Lederhouse, R.C. (1993). Territoriality along flyways as mate locating behavior in male Limenitis arthemis (Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 47: 22–31.Google Scholar
  32. Lederhouse, R. C., Codella, S. G., Grossmueller, D. W., and Maccarone, A. D. (1992). Host plant-based territoriality in the white peacock butterfly, Anartia jatrophae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Insect Behav. 5: 721–728.Google Scholar
  33. McCubbin, C. (1971). Australian Butterflies, Nelson, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  34. Parker, G.A. (1978). Evolution of competitive mate searching. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 23: 173–196.Google Scholar
  35. Pivnick, K. A., and McNeil, J. N. (1987). Diel patterns of activity of Thymelicus lineola adults in relation to weather. Ecol. Entomol. 12: 197–207.Google Scholar
  36. Plaistow, S., and Siva-Jothy, M. T. (1996). Energetic constraints on male mate-securing tactics in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1233–1238.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenberg, R. H. (1989). Behavior of the territorial species Limenitis weidemeyerii (Nymphalidae) within temporary feeding areas. J. Lepid. Soc. 43: 102–107.Google Scholar
  38. Rutowski, R. L. (1991). The evolution of male mate-locating behavior in butterflies. Am. Nat. 138: 1121–1139.Google Scholar
  39. Rutowski, R. L. (1992). Male mate-locating behavior in the common eggfly, Hypolimnas bolina (Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 46: 24–38.Google Scholar
  40. Rutowski, R. L., Terkanian, B., Eitan, O., and Knebel, A. (1997). Male mate-locating behavior and yearly population cycles in the snout butterfly, Libytheana bachmanii (Libytheidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 51: 197–207.Google Scholar
  41. Shreeve, T. G. (1984). Habitat selection, mate location, and microclimatic constraints on the activity of the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. Oikos 42: 371–377.Google Scholar
  42. Sinervo, B., and Lively, C. M. (1996). The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature 380: 240–243.Google Scholar
  43. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry, 3rd ed., Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Stutt, A. D., and Willmer, P. (1998). Territorial defence in speckled wood butterflies: Do the hottest males always win? Anim. Behav. 55: 1341–1347.Google Scholar
  45. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  46. Van Dyck, H., Matthysen, E., and Dhondt, A. A. (1997). The effect of wing colour on male behavioural strategies in the speckled wood butterfly. Anim. Behav. 53: 39–51.Google Scholar
  47. Waltz, E. C., and Wolf, L. L. (1984). By Jove!! Why do alternative mating tactics assume so many different forms? Am. Zool. 24: 333–343.Google Scholar
  48. Waltz, E. C., and Wolf, L. L. (1988). Alternative mating tactics in male white-faced dragonflies (Leucorrhinia intacta): Plasticity of tactical options and consequences for reproductive success. Evol. Ecol. 2: 205–231.Google Scholar
  49. Wickman, P.-O. (1985). The influence of temperature on the territorial and mate locating behavior of the small heath butterfly, Coenonympha pamphilus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 233–238.Google Scholar
  50. Wickman, P.-O. (1988). Dynamics of mate-searching behaviour in a hilltopping butterfly, Lasiommata megera (L.): The effects of weather and male density. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 93: 357–377.Google Scholar
  51. Wickman, P.-O., and Wiklund, C. (1983). Territorial defense and its seasonal decline in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria). Anim. Behav. 31: 1206–1216.Google Scholar
  52. Wolf, L. L., and Waltz, E. C. (1993). Alternative mating tactics in male white-faced dragonflies: Experimental evidence for a behavioural assessment ESS. Anim. Behav. 46: 325–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darrell J. Kemp
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Tropical BiologyJames Cook UniversityCairnsAustralia

Personalised recommendations