Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 259–269

Workers' Compensation Costs When Maximum Benefits Change

  • Richard J. Butler
  • B. Delworth Gardner
  • Harold H. Gardner
Article
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

“Natural experiment” studies of benefit utilization in workers' compensation have used changes in statutory maximum payments to estimate claim duration elasticities. These studies so far have been limited to using insurance claims data rather than information on individual workers. The result is a failure to estimate changes in claim frequency or the average costs per worker as maximums change. This is the first natural experiment study to analyze changes in both the frequency and severity of workers' compensation claims using data from a single large U.S. employer. In addition, the utilization response to benefit decreases as well as benefit increases is examined.

Workers' compensation natural experiment claims frequency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Butler, Richard J., William G. Johnson, and Marjorie Baldwin. (1995). “Managing Work Disability: Why First Return to Work is Not a Measure of Success, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 452–469.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, Richard J. (1994). “Economic Determinants of Workers' Compensation Trends”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 61, 383–401.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, Richard J. (1983). “Wage and Injury Rate Response to Shifting Levels of Workers' compensation,” in Safety and the Work Force: Incentives and Disincentives in Workers' Compensation, ed. John D. Worrall, (Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  4. Butler, Richard J. and David Appel. (1990). “Benefit Increases in Workers' Compensation,” Southern Economic Journal, 56, 594–606.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, Richard J. and John D. Worrall. (1983). “Workers' Compensation: Benefit and Injury Claim Rates in the Seventies,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 580–589.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, Richard J. and John D. Worrall. (1985). “Work Injury Compensation and the Duration of Nonwork Spells,” Economic Journal, 95, 714–724.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, Richard J. and John D. Worrall. (1988). “Self Insurance in Workers' Compensation,” in Workers' Compensation Insurance: Claim Costs, Prices and Regulation David Durbin and Philip S. Borba, ed. (Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993).Google Scholar
  8. Butler, Richard J. and John D. Worrall. (1991). “Claims Reporting and Risk Bearing Moral Hazard in Workers' compensation,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 53, 191–204.Google Scholar
  9. Chelius, James R. and John F. Burton, Jr. (1992). “Who Actually Pays for Workers' Compensation?” Workers' Compensation Monitor (Nov/Dec 1992), pp.25–25, and reprinted in 1995 Workers' Compensation YearBook (LRP Publications, Horsham, PA, 1994).Google Scholar
  10. Chelius, James R. (1977). Workplace Safety and Health (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1977).Google Scholar
  11. Chelius, James R. (1982). “The Influence of Workers' compensation on Safety Incentives,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 35, 235–242.Google Scholar
  12. Chelius, James R. (1983). “Workers' compensation and the Incentive to Prevent Injuries,” in Safety and the Workforce: Incentives and Disincentives in Workers' Compensation, ed. John D. Worrall, (Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  13. Currington, William P. (1994). “Compensation for Permanent Impairment and the Duration of Work Absence: Evidence from Four Natural Experiments,” Journal of Human Resources, 29, 888–910.Google Scholar
  14. Hirsch, Barry T., David A. Macpherson, and J, Michael Dumond. (1995). “Workers' Compensation Recipiency in Union and Nonunion Workplaces,” Florida State University, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, William G. (1983). “Work Disincentives of Benefit Payments,” in Safety and the Work Force: Incentives and Disincentives in Workers' compensation, ed. John D. Worrall, (Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, William G., Marjorie Baldwin and Richard Butler. (1995). “First spells of Work Absences Among Ontario Workers,” Research in Canadian Workers' Compensation, ed. Terry Thomason and Richard P. Chaykowski (Industrial Relations Centre, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. Kniesner, Thomas J. and John D. Leeth. (1989). “Separating the Reporting Effects from the Injury Rate Effects of Workers' compensation Insurance: A Hedonic Simulation,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42, 280–293.Google Scholar
  18. Krueger, Alan B. and John F. Burton, Jr. (1990). “The Employers' Costs of Workers' Compensation Insurance: Magnitudes, Determinants, and Public Policy,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, p. 228–240.Google Scholar
  19. Krueger, Alan B. (1990a). “Incentive Effects of Workers' Compensation Insurance,” Journal of Public Economics, (February 1990), 41, 73–99.Google Scholar
  20. Krueger, Alan B. (1990b). “Workers' Compensation Insurance and the Duration of Workplace Injuries,” National Bureau of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA) Working paper N0. 3253, 1990b.Google Scholar
  21. Leigh, J. Paul. (1985). “Analysis of Workers' Compensation Laws Using Data on Individuals,” Industrial Relations 24, 247–256.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer, Bruce D., W. Kip Viscusi, and David L. Durbin. (1995). “Workers' Compensation and Injury Duration: Evidence from a Natural Experiment,” American Economic Review (June 1995), pp. 322–340.Google Scholar
  23. Ruser, John W. (1985). “Workers' Compensation Insurance, Experience Rating, and Occupational Injuries,” Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 487–503.Google Scholar
  24. Ruser, John W. (1991a). “Workers' Compensation and Occupational Injuries and Illnesses,” Journal of Labor Economics,9, 4, 325–350.Google Scholar
  25. Ruser, John W. (1991b). “Workers' compensation and the Distribution of Occupational Injuries,” BLS Working Paper 211 (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, April 1991).Google Scholar
  26. Ruser, John W. (1990). “The Impact of Workers' Compensation Insurance on Occupational Injuries and Fatalities: Reporting Effects and True Safety Effects,” unpublished manuscript, Office of Economic Research, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  27. Worrall, John D. and David Appel. (1982). “The Wage Replacement Rate and Benefit Utilization in Workers' Compensation Insurance,” Journal of Risk and Insurance 49, 361–371.Google Scholar
  28. Worrall, John D. and Richard J. Butler. (1990). “Heterogeneity Bias in the Estimation of the Determinants of Workers' Compensation Loss Distributions,” in Benefits, Costs, and Cycles in Workers' Compensation ed. Philip S. Borba and David Appel (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. Butler
    • 1
  • B. Delworth Gardner
    • 2
  • Harold H. Gardner
    • 3
  1. 1.C. Arthur Williams, Jr. Professor of Insurance, University of MinnesotaUSA
  2. 2.Professor of Economics Emeritus, Brigham Young UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Options & Choices, Inc.

Personalised recommendations