Argumentation

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 43–52 | Cite as

The Construction of Issues: Pleading Theory and Practice, Relevance in Pragmatics, and the Confrontation Stage in the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation

  • Sebastian McEvoy
Article

Abstract

Legal theory and practice, particularly on the exchange of pleadings, are referred to as a means of examining current thinking in pragmatics on relevance. The rules of pleadings suggest that the concept of relevance as used in pragmatics is emptied of any meaning and that theories of argumentation have not sufficiently taken into account the preliminary construction which issues to be argued about require.

Pleading pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation relevance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Baker, J. H.: 1979, An Introduction to English Legal History, 2nd edition, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  2. van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Lawrence Erbaulm, Hillsdale, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  3. Grice, H. P.: 1975, 'Logic and Conversation', in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics III, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
  4. Harwood B. A. and G. F. Harwood: 1960, Odgers' Principles of Pleading and Practice in Civil Actions, 17th edition, Stevens and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  5. McEvoy, S. T.: 1991, 'Issues in Common Law Pleading and Ancient Rhetoric', Argumentation 5, 245–261.Google Scholar
  6. McEvoy, S. T.: 1993, 'Pleadings: procédure pour un accord minimal', in C. Thomasset, R. Côté et D. Bourcier (eds.), Le droit saisi par l'ordinateur, Y. Blais, Cowansville (Québec), pp. 111–130.Google Scholar
  7. McEvoy, S. T.: 1995, L'invention défensive: poétique, linguistique, droit, Métailié, Paris, 382 pp.Google Scholar
  8. McEvoy, S. T.: 1998, 'A propos de la rationalité procédurale', in A. Borzeix, A. Bouvier and P. Pharo (eds.), Sociologie et connaissance: nouvelles approches cognitives, C.N.R.S. éditions, Paris, pp. 229–245.Google Scholar
  9. Moeschler, J.: 1985, Argumentation et conversation, Hatier, Paris.Google Scholar
  10. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Stephen, H. J.: 1838, A Treatise on the Principles of Pleading in Civil Actions, 2nd edition, Saunders and Benning, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian McEvoy
    • 1
  1. 1.Groupe de Sociologie Politique et MoraleEcole des hautes études en sciences socialesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations